Also, I can't think of any movie that was truly great that didn't have a somewhat decent plot at least. Some plotless movies are fun popcorn munchers but none of them are truly great.
Except for Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle, of course.
Silly movie, rather stupid generic fantasy plot formula 1 A. You can tell it's been written by a 15 year old. I can't really understand why John Malkowich agreed to do this movie. $$$ I guess.
fairy tale crap + unusual injuries = not enough for a good movie
Didn't you get that it was a fantasy-type movie from the previews?
I did, and that's why I was disappointed, not enough fantasy, it was such a cock tease, definitely not the "alice in wonderland for grown ups" movie they said it was
Jackal wrote:Nightshade is right. Casino Royale went about 20-30 minutes too long. Since they left it as a cliffhanger anyway they should have completely left out the entire Venice sequence.
aye. it should've been a bit shorter or a bit more interesting - i liked the comic book cinematography/storytelling thing, but it wasn't enough to keep my attention for over two hours.
300 - I liked it, it reminded me more of on old fashioned movie, with a strong hero that has a lot of integrity. 8/10. Action was good. They made the Persians into video game villains, when they were actually a very great and civilised culture, but, oh well, it was a graphic novel to start with.
ajerara wrote:300 - I liked it, it reminded me more of on old fashioned movie, with a strong hero that has a lot of integrity. 8/10. Action was good. They made the Persians into video game villains, when they were actually a very great and civilised culture, but, oh well, it was a graphic novel to start with.
