PHOTOS PLEASE

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
FanaticX
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:36 pm

Post by FanaticX »

Ok, pop photo decided on this one. It will be published in the July issue. They already have enough content for the next three months!

I think I'm gonna fix the skies up a little. Merging 5 photos does make it look a bit funky.

Image
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Post by Captain »

That is an incredible photo. Congrats man.
Underpants?
Posts: 4755
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Underpants? »

Image
it's not always the quality of the picture--sometimes the story behind eclipses it, right?
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Underpants? wrote:Image
it's not always the quality of the picture--sometimes the story behind eclipses it, right?
Sort of, but if I don't know the story ahead of time, it's just another picture if it doesn't do an effective job of communicating it.

Think of it this way... You can take a picture of something boring, or take a boring picture.

I should add that you can take a great picture with a crappy P&S if you know how to work the light and the composition... Those two elements will get you farther than a story any day
Pete
Posts: 1076
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:03 am

Post by Pete »

FanaticX wrote:Ok, pop photo decided on this one. It will be published in the July issue. They already have enough content for the next three months!

I think I'm gonna fix the skies up a little. Merging 5 photos does make it look a bit funky.

Image
I agree with Captain Mazda, That is an incredible photo. I would make a whole wall tapestry with it.
Great man!.
BTW. I would like know...If you sell them a picture, do you also have to give them the negative, if it's a 35MM, and is it their own as a copyright and you have no right to publish or sell it anymore?
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

You GFY, I really liked a few of those shots from 2 pages back.
RLucky82
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 8:00 am

Post by RLucky82 »

[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/HeavenlyTahoe2.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/TahoeDay2001.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/tosquaw068.jpg[/lvlshot]

Here are my offerings... I know they suck but atleast I had fun taking them. What would you have done to make them better?
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

snow sucked at tahoe this year... still makes for nice pictures though :icon14:
Pete
Posts: 1076
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:03 am

Post by Pete »

RLucky82 wrote:[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/HeavenlyTahoe2.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/TahoeDay2001.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/tosquaw068.jpg[/lvlshot]

Here are my offerings... I know they suck but atleast I had fun taking them. What would you have done to make them better?
-(at least I had fun taking them.) To me that's what count. Great pics. BTW don't ruin your retina taking pics of the sun.
User avatar
PhoeniX
Posts: 4067
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2000 7:00 am

Post by PhoeniX »

wow Dave, I know what you were saying about the 1DS a few weeks ago now.

A friend of my Dad's showed me around his studio today (which I'm free to use if I feel like it), along with his £15k digital hassleblad >:E.

He lent me some of his equipment to try out for the day. I have:

Canon 1Ds Mark II
Canon 16-35mm F2.8L
Canon 70-200mm F2.8L IS
Canon 580EX Speedlite

Image

I'm in love. It makes the 20D seem like a toy and extremely light in comparison.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

RLucky82 wrote:[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/HeavenlyTahoe2.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/TahoeDay2001.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/tosquaw068.jpg[/lvlshot]

Here are my offerings... I know they suck but atleast I had fun taking them. What would you have done to make them better?
love Tahoe. nice, man.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

PhoeniX wrote:wow Dave, I know what you were saying about the 1DS a few weeks ago now.

A friend of my Dad's showed me around his studio today (which I'm free to use if I feel like it), along with his £15k digital hassleblad >:E.

He lent me some of his equipment to try out for the day. I have:

Canon 1Ds Mark II
Canon 16-35mm F2.8L
Canon 70-200mm F2.8L IS
Canon 580EX Speedlite

Image

I'm in love. It makes the 20D seem like a toy and extremely light in comparison.
feckin great camera
RLucky82
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 8:00 am

Post by RLucky82 »

Pete wrote:
RLucky82 wrote:[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/HeavenlyTahoe2.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/TahoeDay2001.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Tahoe%20Trip/tosquaw068.jpg[/lvlshot]

Here are my offerings... I know they suck but atleast I had fun taking them. What would you have done to make them better?
-(at least I had fun taking them.) To me that's what count. Great pics. BTW don't ruin your retina taking pics of the sun.

Thanks for the compliments :icon31:

Now that I think about it I had a polarizer lens that would have helped richen those a little :icon32: ...on the last photo we were driving to Squaw Valley and on the way we were stopping every few minutes to snap photos, since we were already late I was actually running from spot to spot to snap shots ...:olo:

as for the sun I just close my eyes and use a really fast shutter speed.
[lvlshot]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/rlucky82/Astrophoto/Venussun030a.jpg[/lvlshot]
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:You GFY, I really liked a few of those shots from 2 pages back.
Thanks.

Right now...that fagg0t diegay is here and today I took some decent picts of Malmo, Sweden that I'll get up here soon.

I've got a few others I'll dig up as well.
l0g1c
Posts: 1838
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by l0g1c »

Couple newer ones.

Image

Image
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

good god, that camera's horrid.
DiscoDave
Posts: 1645
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:33 pm

Post by DiscoDave »

Im no photographer, and these were only taken with my cameraphone, but.....

(Taken at York, UK today)

[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00298.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00299.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00300.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00301.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00302.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00302.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00303.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00304.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00305.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00306.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00307.JPG[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.zen120628.zen.co.uk/images/York/DSC00308.JPG[/lvlshot]
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

i had a new car today? 2007?
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Doombrain wrote:good god, that camera's horrid.
lol.. it's a holga dude.. you can't really compare it to anything

I am wondering what kind of film he's using, though. The contrast seems a little low. I don't think it was properly sRGB tagged in photoshop before he saved it because it has a lot more color in it in PS than it does in my browser.
l0g1c
Posts: 1838
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by l0g1c »

Dave wrote:
Doombrain wrote:good god, that camera's horrid.
lol.. it's a holga dude.. you can't really compare it to anything

I am wondering what kind of film he's using, though. The contrast seems a little low. I don't think it was properly sRGB tagged in photoshop before he saved it because it has a lot more color in it in PS than it does in my browser.
yeah, that and the uh...back fell of 2 frames after that picture of the gorilla statue :(

The film is Fuji Pro 400H.

I thought the bridge one turned out okay, though :shrug:

I'll need to do some research on the sRGB stuff and photoshopping in general. Those are pretty much straight from the scans. I did adjust brightness/contrast in the gorilla one because it was even worse.

I plan on touching up a lot of the Holga pictures I've taken once I have even the slightest clue of what I'm doing.
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

What you need to do is manually convert to sRGB and attach the ICC profile to the photo when you export it from Photoshop. Do not use Save For Web because it doesn't work very well. Just use normal "Save As".

If you have CS2 or 3, you go to Edit > Convert to Profile... > Select sRGB IEC... in the Destination Space box and click OK. If you scan 16 bit, you have to go to Image > Mode > 8 bits/channel. Then go to File > Save As and save it as a jpeg. Make sure the box that says attach profile or whatever is checked. I always use 9 quality with baseline optimized.

Here's what it looks like after I converted it from Adobe 98 to sRGB.
Image

Here's the original as a comparison
Image
l0g1c
Posts: 1838
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by l0g1c »

Ah. You can really see it in the flags.

Thanks, Dave :icon32:
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

[lvlshot]http://web.ukonline.co.uk/c.slocombe/stdavids.jpg[/lvlshot]

From the room of a hotel we stayed in, with my camera phone
FanaticX
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:36 pm

Post by FanaticX »

Alright, probably my last decent photo from Korea before I head on vacation to the Thai islands for 12 days then back to Canada.

Shot in tungsten WB for the distorted colour effect.

Image
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Nice.
Post Reply