"simulated image of the universe"Iccy wrote:
k.
What you're saying is that you don't believe he exists, but you are going to act like he does to hedge your bets.SplishSplash wrote:I think I'm going to say yes.
If there is a God, he won't be offended, and if there isn't, who cares.
So you don't believe in god (i.e. you're not convinced that there is one).mjrpes wrote:I'm not afraid to answer yes or no, I just don't have an answer. I'm not even veering in one direction or another. I am standing perfectly centered between the two. If there was a third option for not knowing, I would choose that one.
What I mean to say is I do not have enough information to fully conclude that God, defined as the entity that brought us into existence, does or does not exist. I have enough information that allows me to not believe in many of the supposed qualities of God that you find in religion (such as the personified God, the vindictive God, the God who meddles in the daily life of people). But, even though I do not believe in that type of God, I do not have enough information to fully disbelieve in other, more abstract and more scientifically compatible versions of God that you find in Spinoza or Einstein.R00k wrote:
So you don't believe in god (i.e. you're not convinced that there is one).
But this doesn't mean you believe absolutely that there is no god.
Is that accurate?
Anything would be better than fucking your wife.scared? wrote:I used to fuck guys like god in prison...