abcnews tries to punk ron paul...

Post by **scared?** » Tue May 08, 2007 1:31 pm

by not including him in a debate poll...after being pressured, check out the results...lol...america is dead... btw...lol...look at 2nd place...

http://alaskaintel.blogspot.com/2007/05 ... -abcs.html

http://abcnews.go.com/politics/beseenbe ... 88=4000000

Post by **Dr_Watson** » Tue May 08, 2007 11:11 pm

maybe the thought the poll would be too big if they included any names that were not explicitely given to them by the republican national comitee.

Post by **scared?** » Wed May 09, 2007 12:19 am

maybe ur dumb for even suggesting that retarded tripe...

Post by **Duhard** » Wed May 09, 2007 3:45 am

Post by **GhostThane** » Wed May 09, 2007 4:25 am

get over here Duhard I got a mission for you!

Post by **mjrpes** » Wed May 09, 2007 4:50 am

When asked “yes” or “no” on the emotional issue of embryonic stem cell research funding, Paul remained consistent and constitutional, responding that “Programs like this are not authorized under the Constitution.” How Jeffersonian. How Goldwateresque.

How am I supposed to put one foot in front of the other, in order to create a "walking" motion so I may get from one place to the other, if it is not authorized under the constitution??

Post by **Tsakali_** » Wed May 09, 2007 5:05 am

Duhard wrote:img...

wtf dude

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Wed May 09, 2007 6:51 am

mjrpes wrote:
When asked “yes” or “no” on the emotional issue of embryonic stem cell research funding, Paul remained consistent and constitutional, responding that “Programs like this are not authorized under the Constitution.” How Jeffersonian. How Goldwateresque.
How am I supposed to put one foot in front of the other, in order to create a "walking" motion so I may get from one place to the other, if it is not authorized under the constitution??

limits on government, not on individuals

hella strict interpretation, but he's one for consistency

a gentleman and a scholar

Post by **seremtan** » Wed May 09, 2007 6:59 am

mjrpes wrote:
When asked “yes” or “no” on the emotional issue of embryonic stem cell research funding, Paul remained consistent and constitutional, responding that “Programs like this are not authorized under the Constitution.” How Jeffersonian. How Goldwateresque.
How am I supposed to put one foot in front of the other, in order to create a "walking" motion so I may get from one place to the other, if it is not authorized under the constitution??

lol, are you european?

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Wed May 09, 2007 7:02 am

this should be good.. but it won't

Post by **mjrpes** » Wed May 09, 2007 7:04 am

seremtan wrote:
mjrpes wrote:
When asked “yes” or “no” on the emotional issue of embryonic stem cell research funding, Paul remained consistent and constitutional, responding that “Programs like this are not authorized under the Constitution.” How Jeffersonian. How Goldwateresque.
How am I supposed to put one foot in front of the other, in order to create a "walking" motion so I may get from one place to the other, if it is not authorized under the constitution??
lol, are you european?

lol