Halo 3 shots - FUCK.
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Re: Halo 3 shots - FUCK.
o'dium wrote:I mean. FUCK. When did this game get a face lift...? I know I'm usually a graphics whore but... FUCK.
Its just... FUCK?

-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 3783
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 7:00 am
Maybe because all the previous shots of Halo 3 have been Halo 2, but in higher res.Chupacabra wrote:o'dium is blown away by the screenshots but no one else is that impressed?
what is the world coming to?
FYI: i dont see what all the praise about the graphics is about either.
These shots show some serious texture work in some spaces, great use of colours. Compared to Gears its not as good, but Gears is usually tiny maps with 4 Vs 4. This is 16 player Quake style gameplay, fast and fun.
Graphics dont mean everything to a game, but these are Multiplayer graphics, these are the WORST it can look, and I think they have done a half decent job. Compare it to Crysis and it looks poor, compare it to everything else out atm and it looks great. Remember the specs of a 360, and what level of detail 99.9% of us will be running Crysis at, and THEN remember Halo 3 is a full 60FPS locked, and it looks GREAT.
Now we just need some decent SP screens. But at least Bungie listened, and it seems they listened well.
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
more shtos from the beta:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76317
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76317
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Real vids are better than screensEraser wrote:more shtos from the beta:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76317
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/13/today ... a-footage/
:icon32:
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
wow, that looks ALOT better than those shit screens.Don Carlos wrote:Real vids are better than screensEraser wrote:more shtos from the beta:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76317
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/13/today ... a-footage/
:icon32:
looks like ut 2004 to meDon Carlos wrote:Real vids are better than screensEraser wrote:more shtos from the beta:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76317
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/13/today ... a-footage/
:icon32:
[color=red][WYD][/color]S[color=red]o[/color]M
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm
I agree 100%. Halo also allows for bullshit 1-shot kills to the head but if you hit anywhere else it takes like 100. Then there is the homing sword and the rocket launcher that blocks 75% of your view.Deathshroud wrote:I still feel Q3 had THE best MP of any FPS out there.
Halo is too slow, and doesn't have a good selection of weapons.
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
never got into Goldeneye64?4days wrote:it does look nice.+JuggerNaut+ wrote:wow, that looks ALOT better than those shit screens.
that's the first bit of footage i've watched of an mp console game. don't think i'll ever be able to play one with a controller instead of kb/mouse. it just looks so spastic.