Quite a skull

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

it's eccentric, sure, but better embedded in a "skull" rather than a pig's ass.
JB
Posts: 1030
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:31 am

Post by JB »

the mans an astist, after all. I would figure that him and people like him would act like this
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

ey tyou like that skull?

i get you whole set!

1/2 price !
7zark7
Posts: 2354
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2001 8:00 am

Post by 7zark7 »

phantasmagoria wrote:HIrst is an untalented, money driven fuck.

The only artists in public eye that I give the time of day are the Chapmans and sometimes Gormley. I also tolerate Emin because I feel sorry for, but that doesn't stop her work being crap.

That said, it's quita a cool looking skull. Nothing more than that though.
Hirst has audacity... as do the chapmans....and Oursler,Gormley and a list of name drops....... All I was trying to say was I am a fan of contemporary work.
..and as far as being a money driven fuck.. So was that cunting theif Picasso.
and I say Good for him. Its about time the artist sterotype broke out of the starving artist Van GoFF... poor as dirt and crazy from church doctrine,heavy metal pigments and wormwoodgenius/mad- renaissanceman... whos work sells for millions, 100 years after their death.
Be the Moby of the art world and take the money and run.

I love this wike quote about him:
Although Hirst participated physically in the making of early works, he has always needed assistants (Carl Freedman helped with the first vitrines), and now the volume of work produced necessitates a "factory" setup, akin to Andy Warhol's or a Renaissance studio. This has led to questions about authenticity, as was highlighted in 1997, when a spin painting that Hirst said was a "forgery" appeared at sale, although he had previously said that he often had nothing to do with the creation of these pieces.

Hirst said that he only painted five spot paintings himself because, "I couldn't be fucking arsed doing it"; he described his efforts as "shite"—"They're shit compared to ... the best person who ever painted spots for me was Rachel. She's brilliant. Absolutely fucking brilliant. The best spot painting you can have by me is one painted by Rachel." He also describes another painting assistant who was leaving and asked for one of the paintings. Hirst told her to, "'make one of your own.' And she said, 'No, I want one of yours.' But the only difference, between one painted by her and one of mine, is the money.'"[3] By February 1999, two assistants had painted 300 spot paintings.[18]
LOL.




[/quote]
[b][url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/redandjonny/]My Flickr page[/url][/b]

[color=#FFBFFF]A lot of people would say it's a bad idea, on your first day out of prison, to go right back to stalking the tranny hooker that knocked out five of your teeth. But that's how I roll..[/color]
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

i've met the bloke that made that, a few times.
mik0rs
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed May 03, 2000 7:00 am

Post by mik0rs »

Pah, mine's better, it's just that I'm using it atm. It's got squidgy bits inside.
m o n s t r o
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:00 pm

Post by m o n s t r o »

I'll take three. I've got an idea for a 3 Stooges road show...
Denz
Posts: 2587
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Denz »

CaseDogg wrote:i'll wear that bitch around my neck cuz im just that gangsta.
:olo:
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Post by brisk »

Where the hell are the gold teeth?!
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]You might as well have complained about the Mona Lisa right after Michelangelo painted the first two strokes of his brush.[/quote]
DiscoDave
Posts: 1645
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:33 pm

Post by DiscoDave »

Now that's some serious bling
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

Doombrain wrote:i've met the bloke that made that, a few times.
used to bump into the goldsmiths crowd that he went around with a lot in the early 90s. seemed like a right bunch of twats.

come to think of it - there was a guy who made sculptures that looked like IEDs with cameras on them. he never got famous, producing tasteless crap ahead of his time i guess.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

Nightshade wrote:No really, that thing's retarded. What a fucking waste, $98 million. In a pig's ass.
:icon14:
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

I don't have a strong opinion either way.
l0g1c
Posts: 1838
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by l0g1c »

Massive Quasars wrote:I don't have a strong opinion either way.
I am completely ambivalent and sincerely apathetic.
bikkeldesnikkel
Posts: 1145
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:54 pm

Post by bikkeldesnikkel »

l0g1c wrote:
Massive Quasars wrote:I don't have a strong opinion either way.
I am completely ambivalent and sincerely apathetic.
I feel the pros and cons outweigh eachother.
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

4days wrote:
Doombrain wrote:i've met the bloke that made that, a few times.
used to bump into the goldsmiths crowd that he went around with a lot in the early 90s. seemed like a right bunch of twats.

come to think of it - there was a guy who made sculptures that looked like IEDs with cameras on them. he never got famous, producing tasteless crap ahead of his time i guess.
London artists are a bunch of double-barelled, coke-infested cunts, and despite the fact they're all trust fund parasites, the only way to get a drink out of one of them is to stick your finger down their throat.
Post Reply