Will someone unlock my picture thread...

Post by **Kn0wFuRy** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:13 pm

...because raw said to stop quote spamming and I only got to post one picture.

You people know me: that wasn't enough. 0_o

And I am not spamming to make another pic thread.

Post by **Doombrain** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:14 pm

ask raw.

Testoclesius · Post by **Testoclesius** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:15 pm

Kn0wFuRy wrote:...because raw said to stop quote spamming and I only got to post one picture.

You people know me: that wasn't enough. 0_o

And I am not spamming to make another pic thread.

stop spamming bitch :lol:

Post by **Kn0wFuRy** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:19 pm

Doombrain wrote:ask raw.

I am gonna, Doomy. Sup with you?

Post by **Doombrain** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:20 pm

Kn0wFuRy wrote:
Doombrain wrote:ask raw.
I am gonna, Doomy. Sup with you?

fuck all. he locked it, i'm not going to open it because he locked it for a reason.

it's nothing personal

Post by **Kn0wFuRy** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:32 pm

Doombrain wrote:
Kn0wFuRy wrote:
Doombrain wrote:ask raw.
I am gonna, Doomy. Sup with you?
fuck all. he locked it, i'm not going to open it because he locked it for a reason.

it's nothing personal

I didn't take it personal. It wasn't for anything I did. He unlocked it. : )

Post by **SplishSplash** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 5:35 pm

What's the pleasure in posting the same grainy, blurry, low-res pictures over and over again?

Post by **shaft** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 5:39 pm

Kn0wFuRy wrote:...because raw said to stop quote spamming and I only got to post one picture.

You people know me: that wasn't enough. 0_o

And I am not spamming to make another pic thread.

we have seen more then enough.

Post by **Geebs** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:01 pm

We certainly have

Post by **Oblivi0.on** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:32 pm

middle-aged sag boxes. yea, thats JUST what we need.

Post by **LOL INTERNET** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:41 pm

Post by **rep** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 9:48 pm

Please unlock her thread. I need new CW material for my collection. I've seen the girls who play Quake 3, and I can honestly say that she's the prettiest by a longshot.

It's the truth. :lub:

Edit: Plus she's not one of these sponsored fakers. She knows the ins and out of the Quake community.

Post by **bork[e]** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:19 pm

rep wrote:Please unlock her thread. I need new CW material for my collection. I've seen the girls who play Quake 3, and I can honestly say that she's the prettiest by a longshot.

It's the truth. :lub:

Edit: Plus she's not one of these sponsored fakers. She knows the ins and out of the Quake community.

For a girl you like so much you sure do know very little about er. ..idiot :icon29:

Post by **Kn0wFuRy** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:26 am

SplishSplash wrote:What's the pleasure in posting the same grainy, blurry, low-res pictures over and over again?

It amuses me. That is all the pleasure I need to have to do something. : )

And as far as everyone seeing enough.....good!!

Then just don't read my pic threads...."pic" is almost always in the subject line.

Post by **Kn0wFuRy** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:29 am

rep wrote:Please unlock her thread. I need new CW material for my collection. I've seen the girls who play Quake 3, and I can honestly say that she's the prettiest by a longshot.

It's the truth. :lub:

Edit: Plus she's not one of these sponsored fakers. She knows the ins and out of the Quake community.

I am not sure what to think of what you say but I will give you the benefit of a doubt and say thank you.

I cannot play Quake because I am motion sick.

Towering is as much as I have successfully done despite getting advise even from id on motion sickness and gaming.

I am not sponsored or a faker and yes, I have posted with Quakers since 2000 as well as having other friends in the gaming industry, so I know a couple of things.

Post by **rep** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:53 am

Can you play at timescales below 1? Load up a single player game and try running it with the command /timescale .75 and see if it's any better for you. Also try changing your FOV to something lower than 90, like /cg_fov 75. The higher that number is, the more warped everything is, and the faster it appears to move.

The 'same grainy picture' comment was rude. She can do as she likes, just as you can. People shouldn't criticize someone who is confident with themselves enough to post millions of pictures, regardless of the quality of the images. If she wanted to, I'm sure she'd go out to GlamorShots and stun you all, but for the purpose of an internet thread, webcam images suffice. I think they're just fine, and I'm able to extract the proper color information out of them easily... What was once an image rich in blue is restored to the proper fleshy tones of her face.

Post by **Geebs** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:50 am

Does that mean we're allowed to criticize someone who's neurotic enough to post millions of pictures?

On the other hand, having a stupid, socially retarded cunt of rep's magnitude in the thread has really put the mild wierdness of the photo threads and strange meandering posts about nothing much in perspective.

Post by **rep** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 10:14 am

Geebs wrote:Does that mean we're allowed to criticize someone who's neurotic enough to post millions of pictures?

On the other hand, having a stupid, socially retarded cunt of rep's magnitude in the thread has really put the mild wierdness of the photo threads and strange meandering posts about nothing much in perspective.

Yeah,

As far as socially retarded cunt goes, I know you Brits have a different word for everything in your language, so that could be a compliment this week, yet was an insult last.

Along those lines, I hereby destroy your post by posing the following question. Is wierd the new cockney version of weird?

Post by **LXS** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 10:49 am

rep wrote:
Geebs wrote:Does that mean we're allowed to criticize someone who's neurotic enough to post millions of pictures?

On the other hand, having a stupid, socially retarded cunt of rep's magnitude in the thread has really put the mild wierdness of the photo threads and strange meandering posts about nothing much in perspective.
Yeah,

As far as socially retarded cunt goes, I know you Brits have a different word for everything in your language, so that could be a compliment this week, yet was an insult last.

Along those lines, I hereby destroy your post by posing the following question. Is wierd the new cockney version of weird?

You're a total thrupney.

The result of a sherman.

Post by **SplishSplash** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:22 pm

Kn0wFuRy wrote:
SplishSplash wrote:What's the pleasure in posting the same grainy, blurry, low-res pictures over and over again?
It amuses me. That is all the pleasure I need to have to do something. : )

And as far as everyone seeing enough.....good!!

Then just don't read my pic threads...."pic" is almost always in the subject line.

Oh Lord. You sure are amused easily.

Post by **Kn0wFuRy** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:32 pm

SplishSplash wrote:
Kn0wFuRy wrote:
SplishSplash wrote:What's the pleasure in posting the same grainy, blurry, low-res pictures over and over again?
It amuses me. That is all the pleasure I need to have to do something. : )

And as far as everyone seeing enough.....good!!

Then just don't read my pic threads...."pic" is almost always in the subject line.
Oh Lord. You sure are amused easily.

I am.

Post by **Geebs** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:43 pm

rep wrote:Yeah,

As far as socially retarded cunt goes, I know you Brits have a different word for everything in your language, so that could be a compliment this week, yet was an insult last.

Along those lines, I hereby destroy your post by posing the following question. Is wierd the new cockney version of weird?

Yeah, and tpyo is the new typo

Will someone unlock my picture thread...

Will someone unlock my picture thread...

Re: Will someone unlock my picture thread...

Re: Will someone unlock my picture thread...