which television if you had 1400$
Re: which television if you had 1400$
I was wondering how this thread hit three pages.... Now I know.
Re: which television if you had 1400$
I'm concerned more about getting the best picture quality, how do you think the picture quality compares from a rear proj to a new lcd panel? contrast ratio, color...etc.Turbanator wrote:if you have space, get a rear pro. if not, a samsung LCD, M87 if it's within budget or R87 if it's not.
The key differance between the M87 and R87 series is the 1080P functionality, but technologies such as super clear panel make a huge differance to the apparant contrast of the unit too, so if you had a toss up between a 46¨ R87 and a 40¨ M87 I'd go M87 personally (but some people are more obsessed with size than quality so hey *shrug*)
I have a 55¨ Sony SXRD Rear Pro, I believe the model I have has just been replaced in the states (KDS-55A2020KDS-55A3000). Rear pro's offer the best combination of size, quality (precision), contrast and often produce the best picture from standard SD sources. Down side is the size of them, not bad if you're placing them on a TV stand but impossible to wall mount or terrible if you're crammed for space.
The new sxrd says 2.5ms 120Hz.
http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/sto ... 1665153953
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Re: which television if you had 1400$
Not too many LCD's black levels can compare to a good RPTV. RPTV's are still a very good bang for the buck. some peeps just can't handle the monstrosity of them.
-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
Re: which television if you had 1400$
i work in it and ce retail so I see these products day in day out. if you have space for a rear pro, rear pro over and over again. nothing comes close for picture quality, speed of image, size and value. i was hestitant as hell when i got mine as I mainly deal with lcd product and a dabble of pano plasma, but the offer was too good to be true i took the plunge and got the sony sxrd. never looked back to be honest, really love it and 1080p belows me away time and time again.
i was considering buying a second tv set and my choice there was the 40m87, the samsung products are second to none, it's only because of shit management of their retail channel and dumbass koreans thinking they know what's best in western demographics that their products come across marketted so badly. but view a sammy m87 against any other lcd or plasma and it'll be tough to compare anything to it, and we've handled everything from humax to loewe.
if you can afford to wait then sharp will soon be releasing 100hz 1080p (this combination isn't currently available), this is the ultimate combination and i know atleast 1 other major vendor which will follow suit.
i was considering buying a second tv set and my choice there was the 40m87, the samsung products are second to none, it's only because of shit management of their retail channel and dumbass koreans thinking they know what's best in western demographics that their products come across marketted so badly. but view a sammy m87 against any other lcd or plasma and it'll be tough to compare anything to it, and we've handled everything from humax to loewe.
if you can afford to wait then sharp will soon be releasing 100hz 1080p (this combination isn't currently available), this is the ultimate combination and i know atleast 1 other major vendor which will follow suit.
Re: which television if you had 1400$
so what is this stuff on the new sony 1080p tv's about 120Hz?Turbanator wrote:i
if you can afford to wait then sharp will soon be releasing 100hz 1080p (this combination isn't currently available)
http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/sto ... 1665119631
Re: which television if you had 1400$
i wanted to get an sxrd but becuz of the local of the tv i had to go lcd.
and my theater area i never ever use for that so ive got my 36 sammy beamer in there for a workout tv but sinse i havet worked out heh
and my theater area i never ever use for that so ive got my 36 sammy beamer in there for a workout tv but sinse i havet worked out heh
it is about time!
-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
Re: which television if you had 1400$
hmm... the x series in the uk doesn't have thatshaft wrote:so what is this stuff on the new sony 1080p tv's about 120Hz?Turbanator wrote:i
if you can afford to wait then sharp will soon be releasing 100hz 1080p (this combination isn't currently available)
http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/sto ... 1665119631
http://www.sony.co.uk/view/ShowProduct. ... TVP+LCD+TV
but then looking at the US sharp site I see they already launched their stuff in the states
http://www.sharpusa.com/products/ModelL ... 12,00.html
-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
Re: which television if you had 1400$
ooh, that new x series launches next month in the uk
-
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Re: which television if you had 1400$
i hate Dog.
Re: which television if you had 1400$
that show makes alot more sense if you spend 3 hours useing tile glue b4 you watch it.
it is about time!
Re: which television if you had 1400$
lol. don't know why, but i don't mind it+JuggerNaut+ wrote:i hate Dog.
Re: which television if you had 1400$
sounds like a workaround, what if ur recording?Doombrain wrote:the M87 hunts for a source, so if i turn off the cable and turn the xbox on it changes over.
thats wouldnt be a very useful feature for me anyways.
i tried it on my tv and it doest do that , it goes to the last input used, wich i like and prefer.
it is about time!
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Re: which television if you had 1400$
i think it's looking at his face in HD that upsets me, i don't know.Doombrain wrote:lol. don't know why, but i don't mind it+JuggerNaut+ wrote:i hate Dog.
Re: which television if you had 1400$
i can turn the option off, which i do because i use a program remote.plained wrote:sounds like a workaround, what if ur recording?Doombrain wrote:the M87 hunts for a source, so if i turn off the cable and turn the xbox on it changes over.
thats wouldnt be a very useful feature for me anyways.
i tried it on my tv and it doest do that , it goes to the last input used, wich i like and prefer.
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Re: which television if you had 1400$
one more..Doombrain wrote:i can turn the option off, which i do because i use a program remote.plained wrote:
sounds like a workaround, what if ur recording?
thats wouldnt be a very useful feature for me anyways.
i tried it on my tv and it doest do that , it goes to the last input used, wich i like and prefer.
Re: which television if you had 1400$
I've always been a sony fanboy but I absolutely love what I'e seen of these samsungs. My brother has got a 48" samsung I think or whatever the biggest one is, and HD on it looks incredible. How does sony compare in resolution, etc? I presume it's sony bravias?
Re: which television if you had 1400$
the biggest sammy's 50 something inch. image qul is better in some areas and worse in others next to top of the line sony but mostly better. the black point can't be beat by anyother LCD.
Re: which television if you had 1400$
I was standing in dixons and they had a large screen samsung, and an LG also the same size, back to back playing the same HD DVD. I don't know if it was the way they tuned it or if they'd left them both on factory defaults, but the samsung imo was far more vibrant, with some lovely shades of blue in the colour. Then again, LG probably isn't much to go by. My brothers set already has one dead pixel, which happened about a week or so after he bought it. I don't think he's noticed. Apparently that's quite common in LCD's?Doombrain wrote:the biggest sammy's 50 something inch. image qul is better in some areas and worse in others next to top of the line sony but mostly better. the black point can't be beat by anyother LCD.
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Re: which television if you had 1400$
i don't even know what dixon's is, but most places don't fuck with settings at all because they come from the factory setup with brightness/contrast cranked up which most noobs prefer.Melvin wrote:I was standing in dixons and they had a large screen samsung, and an LG also the same size, back to back playing the same HD DVD. I don't know if it was the way they tuned it or if they'd left them both on factory defaults, but the samsung imo was far more vibrant, with some lovely shades of blue in the colour. Then again, LG probably isn't much to go by. My brothers set already has one dead pixel, which happened about a week or so after he bought it. I don't think he's noticed. Apparently that's quite common in LCD's?Doombrain wrote:the biggest sammy's 50 something inch. image qul is better in some areas and worse in others next to top of the line sony but mostly better. the black point can't be beat by anyother LCD.
Re: which television if you had 1400$
i've never had a hot pixel with my sammy's and i'm on my second model. samsung follow the ISO standard on dead/hot pixel as well, so if you do ever have an issue you know you've got backing.Melvin wrote:I was standing in dixons and they had a large screen samsung, and an LG also the same size, back to back playing the same HD DVD. I don't know if it was the way they tuned it or if they'd left them both on factory defaults, but the samsung imo was far more vibrant, with some lovely shades of blue in the colour. Then again, LG probably isn't much to go by. My brothers set already has one dead pixel, which happened about a week or so after he bought it. I don't think he's noticed. Apparently that's quite common in LCD's?Doombrain wrote:the biggest sammy's 50 something inch. image qul is better in some areas and worse in others next to top of the line sony but mostly better. the black point can't be beat by anyother LCD.