Gtkradian error...

Discussion for Level editing, modeling, programming, or any of the other technical aspects of Quake
Post Reply
joecoolaug
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:43 pm

Gtkradian error...

Post by joecoolaug »

Hey. I just bought a new pc with vista. I installed EF1 and downloaded GTKradiant. I also transferred all other related files from my old computer to my new one.
I opened up radiant for the first time, and the console gave me this message
runtime error: GTK+ error: GtkGlExt-WARNING **:cannot create GdkGlContext
It also had this:
------------------
kernel 32!RaiseException() + 58
GtkRadiant!write_stack_tract(outputStream) + 3B c:\dev\gtkradiant\radiant\stacktrace.cpp line 269
GtlRadiant!PopupDebugMessageHandler::handleMessage() + 20 c:\dev\gtkradiant\radiant\main.cpp line 252
GtkRadiant!error_redirect(domain, log_level, message, user_data) + 52F c:\dev\gtkradiant\radiant\main.cpp line 186
ntdll!RtTryEnterCriticalSection() + 76E
I googled the first line and found an instance of this happening to someone with XP, so it can't be that I got Windows Vista. My computer also has superior specs from my last one (160GB HDD, 512MB RAM, 3.47GHz Celeron D, 256MB nvidiaGP, etc.). Any idea how to fix this?
^misantropia^
Posts: 4022
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:24 pm

Re: Gtkradian error...

Post by ^misantropia^ »

You will want to install up-to-date drivers for your video card.
Magnus
Posts: 529
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 6:38 pm

Re: Gtkradian error...

Post by Magnus »

[quote="joecoolaug"]My computer also has superior specs from my last one (160GB HDD,
512MB RAM,
(Ouch! That is a low amount of memory for today)
3.47GHz Celeron D,
What?! They really make a little ol' celeron with with that high MHz? So the celerons out perform the pentiums now? That just seems messed up.
256MB nvidiaGP, So it has an onboard graphics chip useing 256 MB of system RAM?

Out of curiosity what is the brand and model of this computer?
It seem like they built it very unbalanced.
The HD space seems to almost match the MHz, but should actually be at least 300GB to match a processor with that high of MHz and the RAM should be at least 2GB. An onboard video chipset that has system RAM allocated as video ram is fairly standard on most systems when they are bought though so that part is normal.
Also a few other questions. How many RAM slots does it have and what speed is the MOBO FSB?
Did you get it for a really good price?

I know these questions are off topic, but I was just curious as to what the new systems comeing out with Vista on them are built like.
Uh, well....good luck with that. :shrug:

[img]http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g228/Magnus3204/forumheader.jpg[/img]
dichtfux
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:51 pm

Re: Gtkradian error...

Post by dichtfux »

Sounds like a strange setup to me, too.
[color=#FFFFFF][url=http://maps.rcmd.org]my FPS maps[/url][/color]
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Gtkradian error...

Post by obsidian »

I think those are the specs of his "last one".
joecoolaug
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:43 pm

Re: Gtkradian error...

Post by joecoolaug »

Magnus wrote:
joecoolaug wrote:My computer also has superior specs from my last one (160GB HDD,
512MB RAM,
(Ouch! That is a low amount of memory for today)
3.47GHz Celeron D,
What?! They really make a little ol' celeron with with that high MHz? So the celerons out perform the pentiums now? That just seems messed up.
256MB nvidiaGP, So it has an onboard graphics chip useing 256 MB of system RAM?

Out of curiosity what is the brand and model of this computer?
It seem like they built it very unbalanced.
The HD space seems to almost match the MHz, but should actually be at least 300GB to match a processor with that high of MHz and the RAM should be at least 2GB. An onboard video chipset that has system RAM allocated as video ram is fairly standard on most systems when they are bought though so that part is normal.
Also a few other questions. How many RAM slots does it have and what speed is the MOBO FSB?
Did you get it for a really good price?

I know these questions are off topic, but I was just curious as to what the new systems comeing out with Vista on them are built like.

I got it real cheap from a friend on Ebay... 259$. I was impressed that it came new in the box. Apparantly it's a Compaq Pres. SR5010NX. The motherboard FSB supports 1066 MHz or 800 MHz. I think it was a custom Presario, b/c the specs given for this model have it with a 120GB HDD (instead of 160) and optional 1 or 2 gig RAM instead of my miniscule 512 megabytes. Seriously, who would downgrade their RAM?
It's meant to be an upgradable pc... but it has limited expansion slots... it has one slot for expanding RAM.
I'm into gaming, so expandable memory would be a Godsend... anyone know where I can get some cheap expansions?

...Yes, this is my current computer's specs... my old computer (which was a pain in the drain for gaming - it was six years old) only had 1.2GHz Pentium M (or something), 40GB HDD (filled in the first month - i bought an external drive), GeForce MX440 w/ 64MB allocated memory. It had two disc drives, but they couldn't interchangebly read each other (one read cds, the other dvds - which was a waste of space and money).
It sounds crazy, but it was cool back in the day...As in, that day I bought it six years ago for $1000. It didn't even come with a monitor.
wattro
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 1:12 am

Re: Gtkradian error...

Post by wattro »

I've seen a lot of deals like this around lately. Not quite for as cheap, but with free upgrades thrown in and 360s or PS3s attached to the bundle. It almost turned me into a temporary reseller - esp since my home PC is about 4 years old (2.4 GHz).
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Gtkradian error...

Post by obsidian »

Almost a year ago and for $300, I picked up a Compaq sr1650nx: AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 1GB RAM, 250GB HD, then upgraded to a 6600GT for another $100. It's currently my Linux box. That was, of course, a very special one time deal that I jumped on. :)

I don't think anyone downgraded your RAM, the HP website says it comes with 512MB. Depending on what kind of games you are playing, that computer is still a little dated. More RAM and (depending on what nVidia card you have in there now) a relatively cheap video card upgrade will probably be needed.

DDR2 Memory should be roughly $50 for a 1GB stick or less (ridiculously cheap these days). I picked up 2x 1GB laptop sticks for my Mac and cost me $100. Where to buy it from depends on your location, but you should perhaps try Newegg. You certainly don't need the more expensive high latency stuff but stick with a decent brand. That Kingston 1GB for $30 looks pretty good, though read up on it just to make sure that's exactly what you need.
joecoolaug
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:43 pm

Re: Gtkradian error...

Post by joecoolaug »

obsidian wrote:Almost a year ago and for $300, I picked up a Compaq sr1650nx: AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 1GB RAM, 250GB HD, then upgraded to a 6600GT for another $100. It's currently my Linux box. That was, of course, a very special one time deal that I jumped on. :)

I don't think anyone downgraded your RAM, the HP website says it comes with 512MB. Depending on what kind of games you are playing, that computer is still a little dated. More RAM and (depending on what nVidia card you have in there now) a relatively cheap video card upgrade will probably be needed.

DDR2 Memory should be roughly $50 for a 1GB stick or less (ridiculously cheap these days). I picked up 2x 1GB laptop sticks for my Mac and cost me $100. Where to buy it from depends on your location, but you should perhaps try Newegg. You certainly don't need the more expensive high latency stuff but stick with a decent brand. That Kingston 1GB for $30 looks pretty good, though read up on it just to make sure that's exactly what you need.
Thanks... I'm considering that. I see a good priced one for $40 at Staples or Best Buy. I don't feel like dealing with shipping and waiting for it to come :sly: .
Unfortunately, my model is lacking in expansion slots. It only has one extra RAM slot and one extra PCI slot. Thankfully it doesn't have 2x256MB RAM, otherwise I'd be out of space. There's such a big price gap from the individual 1GB and 2 GB modules.
I'm thinking about upgrading my graphics processor too. It's only 64MB, contrary to what I posted first (I was mistaken. WHOOPS. Who knew they sold PC's with GPCards with < 128MB allocated memory still these days?). I've found a good 256MB one for just under $40 at geeks.com.

Microsoft's website says that they recommend half a gig of memory for Vista Basic. I don't know who did the testing for that, but they are very wrong. My games are choppier than a sufficiently talented Chinese chef. On online multiplayer games, I seem to be good at a little thing called "lag-camping." ...lol

About a year ago, I bought a PC (which is now recoverring from a near-death bout with the Vundo virus). It has everything my computer now has except two things. One: it came with 256MB of memory built-in on the video card. It also came with a monitor and windows XP. It only paid about a fifty bucks more for that one. I wonder what has happened to quality these days. For fifty less, I got 1/4 as much video card memory, a confusing OS that needs way more RAM than I have, no built-in memory card reader, and no monitor.

By the way... back to the original question. I downloaded the latest driver for my *cough*unimpressive*cough* video card. Unfortunately, Window's wonderful Vista showed me a shiny alert screen informing me that I couldn't update the driver anywhere other than their own Windows Updater (or something).
Post Reply