
Test
Re: Test
This one's 15x15 so it can be used like the smilies without changing the height of the text line.

I made the first one 16x16 cause I was going to resize it but the html wouldn't work for that. (16 is a better number for computers to resize cause it's doubled from 1. I was going to resize it to another doubled number like 512. It should display better doubled.)

I made the first one 16x16 cause I was going to resize it but the html wouldn't work for that. (16 is a better number for computers to resize cause it's doubled from 1. I was going to resize it to another doubled number like 512. It should display better doubled.)
Re: Test
These one's are faster, they don't play at the faster speed in IE 6, they look just like the slower ones, but they play fast in Firefox. I don't use Firefox cause it doesn't let you resize the text.
[Edit: I removed the pictures cause they just slow down the browser animations, including the previous ones.]
(In the first ones I posted the frames are 5/100ths of a second, in these they are 2/100ths of a second. I tried 1/100ths but they displayed slow in Firefox (and IE 6).)
[Edit: I removed the pictures cause they just slow down the browser animations, including the previous ones.]
(In the first ones I posted the frames are 5/100ths of a second, in these they are 2/100ths of a second. I tried 1/100ths but they displayed slow in Firefox (and IE 6).)
-
Nightshade
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Re: Test
This thread fucking sucks. Mostly because Dultron is a fucking horribly shitty poster.
Re: Test
You must be very proud.DTS wrote:This one's 15x15 so it can be used like the smilies without changing the height of the text line.
I made the first one 16x16 cause I was going to resize it but the html wouldn't work for that. (16 is a better number for computers to resize cause it's doubled from 1. I was going to resize it to another doubled number like 512. It should display better doubled.)
Re: Test
DTS wrote:These one's are faster, they don't play at the faster speed in IE 6, they look just like the slower ones, but they play fast in Firefox. I don't use Firefox cause it doesn't let you resize the text.
[Edit: I removed the pictures cause they just slow down the browser animations, including the previous ones.]
(In the first ones I posted the frames are 5/100ths of a second, in these they are 2/100ths of a second. I tried 1/100ths but they displayed slow in Firefox (and IE 6).)

Re: Test
This one doesn't display fast in Firefox for some reason (it's 2/100ths of a second per frame). The smaller ones do. It must be the size. (Maybe it will slow down the other animations? Let me see...)

Edit: Yeah, it does. If it's scrolled off screen then the other animations play at the proper speed.
Edit2: And if just the top of it is shown then it plays fast, but it doesn't seem quite as fast as the others.
(This is all in Firefox, IE 6 won't play the 2/100ths per frame speed ones at the right speed anyway.)

Edit: Yeah, it does. If it's scrolled off screen then the other animations play at the proper speed.
Edit2: And if just the top of it is shown then it plays fast, but it doesn't seem quite as fast as the others.
(This is all in Firefox, IE 6 won't play the 2/100ths per frame speed ones at the right speed anyway.)
Re: Test
Thanks.werldhed wrote:ctrl +DTS wrote: I've found the option for that now, I was expecting there to be a button for it, like in IE, but there isn't.
Edit: I thought you meant ctrl + something, so I tried ctrl and the mousewheel, which works (then I posted the message). Then later I found that in the menu it says ctrl + + and stuff.
Last edited by DTS on Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:47 pm, edited 3 times in total.







