building fire in madrid proves 911 hoax...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:52 am

official cause of collapse of wtc 1, 2 and 7 has always been fire...

so why the fuck did this building in madrid which is made junk parts, not collapse in on its own footprint like wtc buildings? maybe because its impossible without explosives...which this fired just proved...

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:52 am

of course

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:59 am

thx...

Post by **Mogul** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:28 am

Freakaloin wrote:official cause of collapse of wtc 1, 2 and 7 has always been fire...

so why the fuck did this building in madrid which is made junk parts, not collapse in on its own footprint like wtc buildings? maybe because its impossible without explosives...which this fired just proved...

"Prove" is a pretty strong word.

Post by **SoM** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:30 am

god thats old, get with the times ffs

and it was the jews

Post by **rep** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:44 am

SoM wrote:god thats old, get with the times ffs

and it was the jews

HAHA! A mossad 'expert' everyone! Check it out.

Post by **SoM** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:47 am

terrorist

Post by **Don Carlos** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:56 am

to be fair the buildings causing as little damage as they did for the size of themis quite strange. I mean you lok at the way the buliding fell in on itself. Why didnt the wind blow the building left or right?

Its very stange considering...

Post by **saturn** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 1:10 pm

nice fire

Post by **Nightshade** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 2:14 pm

Jesus, when is this stupidity going to end?

edit: WHEN WILL THE TYPOS END?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 2:58 pm

wtc 1 2 and 7 were demoed...anyone who isn't a moron knows it...

Post by **phantasmagoria** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:08 pm

who gives a shit?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:28 pm

ur dad took a shit when i was fucking him...silly fagot...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:06 pm

lol...this fire was 1000 times worse then the fires at wtc buildings...at itr didn't fal...and it wasn't even made of steel...rofl...

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:10 pm

did it have a jumbo jet and a hole in the side of the buidling ?

Post by **boo** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:14 pm

losCHUNK wrote:did it have a jumbo jet and a hole in the side of the buidling ?

Owned...

Surley though, having a jumbo jet crash into the side would have weakened the structure of the building...

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:17 pm

what i was thinking, qa hole in the side of the building caused by a jumbo jet and its fuel

and if you looked the way it collapsed the top fell above the hole, so what couldve happened is that the plane took out supports holding the floors above up then the fire destroyed the remaining supports

then the entire top half collapsed onto the bottom causing it to fall like a stack of cards....

if you wanna believe its a hoax then fair enough but that dont prove shit

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:18 pm

wtc 7 wasn't hit by a jet...only a few floors burned...

if u know anything about wtc 1 and 2 construction, u would know the planes could never cause those buildings to be weakened enuff to fall. the exoskeleton was string and was damaged by the planes, but the core of the buildings were intact...and all 3 of the wtc building were made above any standards...and they were STEEL...not concrete...

and by the way dumbo...no one thinks the planes smashing into the buildings had anything to do with the collapse...they buildings were designed to withstand planes crashing into them. the buildings swayed more during storms then they did when they were it by the planes...the fires are the offical reason for the collapse...even though no steel framed skyscaper has collpased from fired until 911...when 3 did...all 3 with minor fires that didn't even get hot enough to melt steel...

don't be a moron...

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:19 pm

o fuck off the fact is you dont know how much damage was caused when the plane hit

wanna know why, because it all ended up as rubble

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:20 pm

wow...it amazing how brainwashed u morons are...do u even know how wtc 1 and 2 were constructed? guess not...and what about wtc7? it was hardly damaged...anyways the owner of the building slipped in an interview and admitted(on camera) the building was "pulled"...

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:21 pm

clit

also the core wass intact ?

in one of the vids you can see flames sprout out the other side of the building when the plane hit, how the fuck can it be intact if that happens

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:21 pm

wanna know why, because it all ended up as rubble

yeah and the rubble was taken and destroyed as fast as possible in sigapore...which is a crime in itself...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:22 pm

cuz the core is in the middle...where the planes never hit...dumbass..

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:22 pm

Freakaloin wrote:wow...it amazing how brainwashed u morons are...do u even know how wtc 1 and 2 were constructed? guess not...and what about wtc7? it was hardly damaged...anyways the owner of the building slipped in an interview and admitted(on camera) the building was "pulled"...

how ?

well im guessing they started from the bottom and worked theyre way up

Post by **boo** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:22 pm

A small plane flying into the tower, yeah, wouldnt do much damage...

But a jumbo fully laden with fuel flown DIRECTLY at the tower, then thats a different story...

EDIT: Damnit, stop posting so quickly, keep missing things out :icon32:

building fire in madrid proves 911 hoax...

building fire in madrid proves 911 hoax...

Re: building fire in madrid proves 911 hoax...