Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Unisaw
Posts: 690 Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:50 pm
Post
by Unisaw » Wed May 28, 2008 3:26 am
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
saw my first R8 today. fuck me.
We have one in our city - I love it from most angles but the headlights just plain suck. Looks like christmas season string lights that never get taken down.
Overall a beauty.
c0ld
Posts: 155 Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:44 am
Post
by c0ld » Wed May 28, 2008 5:15 am
I don't typically like the way these things look, nor do I really care for any Mercedes to be honest but wow.
And I have always duck the look of the old datsun Z's. Seems like they are getting rather popular lately..
[color=#408000]m1ndphuq[/color]
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237 Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dr_Watson » Wed May 28, 2008 12:59 pm
Long overdue.
I think I may finally understand why old dudes at auctions pay silly amounts of money for old muscle cars they were in love with as a child.
Even thought he Mclaren isn't the fastest thing in the world anymore... I'm certain that given unlimited money I'd still want one.
MKJ
Posts: 32582 Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by MKJ » Wed May 28, 2008 1:06 pm
overdue indeed
rrrrr
bitWISE
Posts: 10704 Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am
Post
by bitWISE » Wed May 28, 2008 1:25 pm
One of these (except dark gray) for sale on my way to work
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175 Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Post
by +JuggerNaut+ » Fri May 30, 2008 2:31 pm
the prancing horse with "California" next to it. bad idea.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020 Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Nightshade » Fri May 30, 2008 2:44 pm
Why? 250 GT Californian was an awesome car.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020 Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Nightshade » Fri May 30, 2008 2:46 pm
Meh, doesn't really make a difference to me.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460 Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am
Post
by Ryoki » Fri May 30, 2008 2:52 pm
That car is obviously made for a beautiful blonde woman.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
bitWISE
Posts: 10704 Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am
Post
by bitWISE » Fri May 30, 2008 3:14 pm
There's just nothing exotic and exciting about the name of a US state. If you want to name it after a place, use something with some zing to it like Maranhao or Cameroon or Valencia...etc.
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237 Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dr_Watson » Fri May 30, 2008 6:14 pm
maybe it sounds more exotic if you live in someplace like maranello.
c0ld
Posts: 155 Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:44 am
Post
by c0ld » Fri May 30, 2008 9:01 pm
The concept of a Ferrari with the engine in the front is fucked anyway.
Oh well, I'm sure there will be many blonds with fake tits who think it's "cute". Ferrari has a winner!
[color=#408000]m1ndphuq[/color]
Nightshade
Posts: 17020 Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Nightshade » Fri May 30, 2008 9:27 pm
c0ld wrote: The concept of a Ferrari with the engine in the front is fucked anyway.
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237 Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dr_Watson » Sat May 31, 2008 12:18 am
looks way better from the front BTW.
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237 Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dr_Watson » Sat May 31, 2008 12:27 am
c0ld wrote: The concept of a Ferrari with the engine in the front is fucked anyway.
Oh well, I'm sure there will be many blonds with fake tits who think it's "cute". Ferrari has a winner!
++
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369 Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
Post
by GONNAFISTYA » Sat May 31, 2008 12:33 am
Dr_Watson wrote: looks way better from the front BTW.
I'll take ten.
c0ld
Posts: 155 Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:44 am
Post
by c0ld » Sat May 31, 2008 12:58 am
++
Ok, A "modern" front engined ferrari is fucked,(1971+).
I'd also like to extend that since then 4seater ferrari's are far more so 'meh'.
but to be devils advocate.. This..
the 1962 Ferrari 250GTO was one sexy machine.
[color=#408000]m1ndphuq[/color]
LawL
Posts: 18358 Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:49 am
Post
by LawL » Sat May 31, 2008 1:08 am
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
andyman
Posts: 11198 Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm
Post
by andyman » Sat May 31, 2008 6:26 am
I love how the antenna positioning was designed to lower the drag coefficient thereby raising gas mileage. such beauty. it 'getz' good mileage.
l0g1c
Posts: 1838 Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am
Post
by l0g1c » Sat May 31, 2008 7:15 am
Meh, I guess I like old cars like this hunk o' junk.
edit: fixed piccy
Last edited by
l0g1c on Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:01 am, edited 1 time in total.