here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Discussion for Level editing, modeling, programming, or any of the other technical aspects of Quake
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

here is a small 1 v 1 dm map i've started and liked, its in alpha stage so far. this is about the 4-5th map i've started since q3ctfp3. this has some fun gameplay... i think, feed back wanted. thanks

file http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=0b20 ... ce667198a7

Image
ix-ir
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 9:43 pm

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by ix-ir »

Site down for maintance, try http://www.filedropper.com
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

here is the working link :) cheers ix
http://www.filedropper.com/q3pwdm2
ix-ir
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 9:43 pm

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by ix-ir »

You've got a talent for layouts. At the moment the map's a DA-style map - interesting layout but the items don't work. Only 1 armour and the ammo and health placement is arbitrary. It needs more, perhaps expand the top level? It's also possible to escape the map and run around the outside.
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

yeah item layout is not my strong point :( i'll work on that. and being able to run outside the map is just because i have not started player clipping yet
Dark Metal
Posts: 5496
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2000 8:00 am

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by Dark Metal »

^Escape artist^
[WYD]
Fjoggs
Posts: 2555
Joined: Fri May 03, 2002 7:00 am

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by Fjoggs »

fKd wrote:yeah item layout is not my strong point :( i'll work on that. and being able to run outside the map is just because i have not started player clipping yet
He said the layout was fine, it's the itemplacement that's lacky. ;)
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

item placement and item layout... whats the difference?
pjw
Posts: 860
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by pjw »

Not a big deal, but just for clarification, "alpha" usually means feature-complete. :) In other words, you should really have a functional layout (that people can't get out of), and a functional weapons pass that makes sense before you call it alpha.

Please don't misunderstand--I have no problem whatsoever with you wanting early feedback...however early you want, no problem. Post a build whenever--this is the place.

It's not an alpha though. :)
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

my bad :)
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

ok here is something a bit better. more brush work, and no more escaping the map :) oh and after some games i've moved some item around... i like the idea of using sound to track your enemy... thats what im going for

http://www.filedropper.com/q3pwdm2_2
Fjoggs
Posts: 2555
Joined: Fri May 03, 2002 7:00 am

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by Fjoggs »

fKd wrote:item placement and item layout... whats the difference?
Err, I really have bad reading streak going lately. Nevermind me. :P
ix-ir
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 9:43 pm

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by ix-ir »

All times drunk.
dichtfux
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:51 pm

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by dichtfux »

Term break! :up:
[color=#FFFFFF][url=http://maps.rcmd.org]my FPS maps[/url][/color]
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

in regards to only having 1 AY. im of the opinion that it will make it something to fight over. hence it is in the middle of the map. does this not work in duels? should i have 2? 1 at each end to add a level of map ownage?
dichtfux
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:51 pm

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by dichtfux »

Didn't play the map yet but if you only have one place with a powerful item the up player may be able to simply camp that spot. I'll give it a try tomorrow.
[color=#FFFFFF][url=http://maps.rcmd.org]my FPS maps[/url][/color]
mjolnir
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:16 am

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by mjolnir »

The architecture on this map looks very interesting. I like the screenshot, good location, overall definitely a decent map.
keres
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

cheers. its miles from finished. still working away on a style for it... might go steam punk on it.
pjw
Posts: 860
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by pjw »

I had a chance to look at this for a bit tonight, and while I like the overall look you've started, and the brushwork seems cool, I'm not crazy about the layout at all. Moving around the map feels a bit clumsy, and there are a lot of dead-end feeling areas IMO.

Suggestions/Observations:

1) The LG and RG areas are very dead-end, especially after getting slammed in there by the launch ramps. Maybe tone down those ramps a bit so air control will allow the player to either go high, or go low if the weapon is gone? There's really no place to go except back down/out once you're up there. How about connecting those two areas with the rest of the map in another way? Like maybe...

2) How about a connection from those rooms through to the outside rooftops right on the other side of the wall, since those rooftops are sort of useless right now anyway (IMO). Also maybe make the jump from the rooftops back over to RL a *little* easier? It's slightly tricky right now. Also, I'd consider connecting those two rooftops on into the tele-dest area, since it would be pretty easy to just set up camp up there and wait for your opponent to pop through the teleporter...if you don't do that, at least make the floor there into a shoot-through/see-through mesh or grate...

3) The jumps from LG/RG back across the water toward GL are kind of awkward too--it would be nice if there was maybe a bit more breathing room there? Even 8-16 units on each side of those openings would be nice...

4) I like the tele up to RL, but I would consider switching GL<-->RL. That's a great spot up there to rain down grenades.

5) Needs more armor!
fKd wrote:in regards to only having 1 AY. im of the opinion that it will make it something to fight over. hence it is in the middle of the map. does this not work in duels? should i have 2? 1 at each end to add a level of map ownage?
One armor is usually a bad idea. It becomes easier to control if one person gets the upper hand, and that person tends to keep the advantage. One "power-item" in a map is almost always a bad idea. You should at least have two, whether it's two armors, or an armor plus a MH.

My first reflex would be to put an RA back in that watery floor-level area of death right in the middle with nothing in it--maybe even stick it in an alcove sunk into the very back of the room to make it a little more dangerous to grab--and then move the YA...somewhere. Maybe an area above GL that can be reached jumping from the current RL spot or via jumpshafts up the back of the current GL room? Or both?

This is all just my opinion, and off the top of my head as I'm running around the map and Alt-Tabbing back to Q3W, so feel free to tell me to bugger off. :) I didn't really intend to write so much...
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

thanks heaps for the great feedback. after taking your comment into the editor i think i've got this working much better...
http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=8c08 ... b9a8902bda
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

once the gameplay is down i get to start on detailing woohoo
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

new roof section
Image
new central view
Image
jump pad etc added to second central building lower section
Image
mjolnir
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:16 am

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by mjolnir »

I like! you blend the architecture witt the layout nicely and the lighting in the last picture looks quite nice.
keres
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

updated shot
Image

fuck. been editing for 8 hours with out a break... sore eyes require sleep
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: here we go again, q3pwdm2 testers please :)

Post by fKd »

till my next update, dont bother playtesting this atm. i've been busy working on it (when im not working my other job) and its starting to come together. 2-3 days tops till next update. woo
Post Reply