battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
kôrupt
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 8:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by kôrupt »

Dear nerd,

Nobody cares.

Sincerely,
Cory
phantasmagoria
Posts: 8525
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by phantasmagoria »

I didn't mind it, it left enough scope for a film *prays* :>. Starbuck just disappearing like that left a bitter taste in my mouth, however
[size=85]
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by Jackal »

I loved the ending. Also, as an aside, everyone should watch this series as it is easily the best series television has seen in the past 10 years.
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by brisk »

god did it
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]You might as well have complained about the Mona Lisa right after Michelangelo painted the first two strokes of his brush.[/quote]
EtUL
Posts: 3307
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2001 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by EtUL »

angry nerds look out
LawL
Posts: 18358
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:49 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by LawL »

Jackal wrote:it is easily the best series television has seen in the past 10 years.
Image
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by Dr_Watson »

yeah, the ending was pretty crap and very lazy by the writers (the God cop-out was as unsatisfying as it was when Christianity did it.)
the complete leap of madness they perform with there ships is also rather :dork:
User avatar
Whiskey 7
Posts: 9709
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by Whiskey 7 »

Dr_Watson wrote:yeah, the ending was pretty crap and very lazy by the writers (the God cop-out was as unsatisfying as it was when Christianity did it.)
the complete leap of madness they perform with there ships is also rather :dork:
Hard to believe isn't it :ninja: The instantaneous jumping around the universe bit. I to believe it was an easy out for the writes/scripters :down:
[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
Cobalt-60
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:03 pm

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by Cobalt-60 »

when using chariots of the gods as a blueprint for world history you're bound to piss off the creationists in the audience; it order to achieve universal appeal in a self-declared 'christian' nation it becomes necessary for the author to include the "god" from their bible as part of the fiction, lest it be necessary for that segment of the audience to suspend their belief structure in order to enjoy the show. and/or, he threw religion a bone rather than endure the same zealotry that the original series did in 1978. if you want an explanation for angels you're supposed to reference real world religion because those are the same fictional angels that were included in the show.

assuming it was RDM's intention from the start for the series to crash-land on our "earth" 150000years in our past, forming the missing link in our evolution, and explaining modern man's presence here on earth .. then that says one or two things about "religion" here in the real world which would not be politically correct. in order for that premise to jive with real world history, you pretty much need to throw out christianity and creationism, in favor of "alien visitors" mating with primitive man.(von daniken's "alien astronaut" theory from chariots of the gods)

that was one of the controversies over the original in the 1970's. it even began with a narrative to smooth over religious zealots "..there are those who beLIEve that life here began out there..."; this was setting up the premise in such a light that christians might still find it accessible. (they didn't). the entire premise is based on the idea that mankind are migrants to planet earth; that we were NOT created here by the one true god, and the bible is basically bullshit.

but the way this version was written (by NOT explaining Kara, head six, or head baltar) this throws the religious zealots a bone: now we can chalk it all up to the "one true god" and the zealots can STFU. :p its very diplomatic, to include the one true god (unexplained) like this. and in fact the "only" way that RDM could get away with landing galactica on earth 150,000years on our past, without pissing off the decidedly christian nation to which this entertainment is meant to appeal.

so yeah.

I can see why they brought out the religion in the end of the series, and pimped the whole "one true god" angle as part of the fiction. from a writers POV that was a natural consequence of tying the series history into OUR history, in reality, where, most of the audience believes in such a god and would NEVER "suspend their disbelief" enough to accept that kind of timeline -- a necessary consequence of inserting the series into our reality.

I can also see why it went unexplained -- afterall this stuff is not even explained in our own real world religion, which you can now see as part of the fiction -- "angels" are not even explained in the bible from whence they came; if RDM had attempted to explain "angels" then that would mean wading hip-deep into the very controversy which they were included in the story to avoid.

------> the bit about humans coming to earth 150,000years ago was actually part of the script, back in 1978. so that was to be expected I think. its just a shame, to me, that as a result of this, some of the coolest characters in TV history are now explained by the show "touched by an angel" starring eddie van halens wife :\ *sigh*

-=========-

p.s:as per the whole "this has all happened before" prophecy:

there's an implication in the story that god originally created man in his image so he could mate with his creation and beget a new race to replace his own role in the universe (call them the lords of kobol); the lords of kobol created "13th tribe" cylons in their image so they could mate with them and create a new race, which replaced their own role in the universe (ie:colonials are the second "strain" of humanity, derived from a half-breed of the previous human race and their cylons); the colonials then created current-generation cylons and mated with them to create a new half breed race which replaced their own role in the universe(the decendants of Hera - namely "US" here on earth - are a third new strain of humanity derived from a half-breed of the previous human race and their cylons); etc....)

at each cycle, the process of creation begets a new human race which is 1/2 cylon, and ultimately replaces the old one through years of interbreeding; it also begets a new race of 'pure' Cylons which go off to form their own colony.(in the previous cycle it was the 13th colony. this cycle it was the centurions who sailed away in their own base star)

---> as per "this has all happened before"... *drumroll*
the "Humans" in BSG are revealed to be half breeds between the "lords of kobol" and the "Cylons" of the 13th tribe.
(everyone on the show was "half cylon" from the start)

also Kara was a half breed between a BSG human and an "angel"(ffs). :rolleyes:
so that makes her like... 1/2"angel",1/4cylon,1/8human,and 1/8"god" :p (heh)
go figure.
Dark Metal
Posts: 5496
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2000 8:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by Dark Metal »

That's alot of typing.
[WYD]
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by xer0s »

Omg, we hit the jackpot with this guy...
epicgoo
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:24 pm

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by epicgoo »

ending was as bad as the rest of series. umm so...?
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

wasn't the preview of the new stargate at the ending?

wouldn't that make the ending awesome?
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by xer0s »

In other related nerd news, the new Star Trek movie trailer looks fucking sweet. And I'm not even a Trek fan...
User avatar
Whiskey 7
Posts: 9709
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by Whiskey 7 »

Omg, we hit the jackpot with this guy...
and
xer0s wrote:In other related nerd news, the new Star Trek movie trailer looks fucking sweet. And I'm not even a Trek fan...
Yuo're right on both counts there xer0s :olo:
Dark Metal wrote:That's alot of typing.

Yep, so much so I got to read it later as I am of to work. Good news, 2 more shifts 'till HOLIDAYS for me :D
[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by seremtan »

ending was poor, and "best show in last 10 years"? it was good, even great at times, but i think not

deadwood? the wire? hell, even firefly
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by losCHUNK »

seremtan wrote:ending was poor, and "best show in last 10 years"? it was good, even great at times, but i think not

deadwood? the wire?
faggot
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by Jackal »

seremtan wrote:ending was poor, and "best show in last 10 years"? it was good, even great at times, but i think not

deadwood? the wire? hell, even firefly
I heard how wrong you were even before I logged on here.
Peenyuh
Posts: 3783
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 3:46 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by Peenyuh »

losCHUNK wrote:
seremtan wrote:ending was poor, and "best show in last 10 years"? it was good, even great at times, but i think not

deadwood? the wire?
faggot
[color=#00FF00][b]"How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?" Asked of a Scottish driving instructor in 1995.[/b][/color]
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by 4days »

seremtan wrote:ending was poor, and "best show in last 10 years"? it was good, even great at times, but i think not

deadwood? the wire? hell, even firefly
BSG was excellent (slightly biased because it's the only tv show i've gone out of my way to watch). it's a shame the ending was a bit daft and returned to a part of the story that no-one civilised would care about. and i wish they'd done some of the wrapping up for the twaddle fans before things started exploding.
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by losCHUNK »

4days wrote:
seremtan wrote:ending was poor, and "best show in last 10 years"? it was good, even great at times, but i think not

deadwood? the wire? hell, even firefly
and i wish they'd done some of the wrapping up for the twaddle fans before things started exploding.
lol i thought that, thought it was quite odd.

didnt like the end, apart from all the explosions.... starbuck disapearing ? wtf ey ?

and when lee said sommat like "lets start from scratch" why didnt someone shoot him ?, and that bit right at the end with the dancing robots, that was embarassing :disgust:
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by seremtan »

4days wrote:
seremtan wrote:ending was poor, and "best show in last 10 years"? it was good, even great at times, but i think not

deadwood? the wire? hell, even firefly
BSG was excellent (slightly biased because it's the only tv show i've gone out of my way to watch). it's a shame the ending was a bit daft and returned to a part of the story that no-one civilised would care about. and i wish they'd done some of the wrapping up for the twaddle fans before things started exploding.
you did catch the part where i said it was "good, even great at time"? i enjoyed all of it, but the quality fell off toward the end of S05, and that's a fact. it could have gone to the next level but instead they rushed it. the story of gater and zarek (sp?)'s insurrection could have been so much more interesting if they taken it into a morally greyer area, making zarek more sympathetic and so on

it's so annoying because they set themselves up for a great final season with all that stuff about starbuck's destiny/hera/final five, but just couldn't pull it off in the end. oh, and the way the attack on the cylon base ended was THE lamest thing in the whole series: cavil becomes an hero and then dead raptor pilot accidentally the whole shebang with a few nukes - an incomprehensible narrative lapse
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by seremtan »

Jackal wrote:
seremtan wrote:ending was poor, and "best show in last 10 years"? it was good, even great at times, but i think not

deadwood? the wire? hell, even firefly
I heard how wrong you were even before I logged on here.
seriously, if you think BSG was the best thing in 10 years you're a fucking idiot. it was very good or even excellent but there have been better shows, like the ones i listed

i know i'm right
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by 4days »

seremtan wrote:dead raptor pilot accidentally the whole shebang with a few nukes
aye. couldn't it have been a brave pilot struggling with a dead crew and an about-to-brick raptor? there was so much potential for that final battle but it ultimately it was a damp squib.
seremtan wrote:you did catch the part where i said it was "good, even great at time"?
had intended to launch into a spirited defense after that crack about bias - then i didn't think to gib the quote after remembering that the last show i actually watched every episode of was blake's 7, and that i stopped watching BSG for a while towards the end because it was getting boring.

still, the first couple of seasons were really, really good telly. even the religious stuff was tolerable then. will have to give firefly a go, been meaning to for ages.
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: battlestar galactica ending sucked so hard

Post by obsidian »

Good point, so if a single one of those ships can hold a number of nukes that can take out a Cylon mothership, WTF were they all worried about before? Just load up a few more of those suckers and blow all they Cylons to hell.

I figured Galactica, being a crippled ship, would have gone on a real suicide mission and self destruct. What a waste.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Post Reply