$1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

$1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by Eraser »

A federal jury ruled Thursday that Jammie Thomas-Rasset willfully violated the copyrights on 24 songs, and awarded recording companies $1.92 million, or $80,000 per song.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_tec_music_downloading


I don't understand the American legal system. How do they justify the $80,000 per song? If it's 24 songs she downloaded, then shouldn't she get the same kind of fine that you'd get for shoplifting 2 or 3 CD's? I doubt a petty thief would have to pay 1.9 million dollar over stealing 3 CD's.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by MKJ »

but its recursive!
by downloading, she MUST have also shared them with others, who in turn shared them with others, etc!

come to think of it, the fine should be $ ∞
Captain a13n
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:02 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by Captain a13n »

This doesn't make sense at all.

Because whites has ignored copyright of blacks while attaching price tags, that is piracy, anyone can ignore as well.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by MKJ »

yes. *the article* is what doesnt make sense here.
Captain a13n
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:02 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by Captain a13n »

Everyone's piracy is the universal friendship.
Only someone's piracy is the universal music.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by Massive Quasars »

I thought we agreed, no blacks and jews, when we wrote copyright law?
Captain a13n
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:02 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by Captain a13n »

Some inter-national merchants are apparently pirates, includign potsc.
^misantropia^
Posts: 4022
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:24 pm

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by ^misantropia^ »

I sometimes wonder how a13n's brain is wired.

Back on topic, this broad got slapped with this gargantuan fine because she:

a) appealed when she was already convicted (and obviously guilty)
b) was caught lying during the trial
c) held the jury in contempt

In short, she brought it on herself.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by Eraser »

^misantropia^ wrote:I sometimes wonder how a13n's brain is wired.

Back on topic, this broad got slapped with this gargantuan fine because she:

a) appealed when she was already convicted (and obviously guilty)
b) was caught lying during the trial
c) held the jury in contempt

In short, she brought it on herself.
Yes, because that's how justice works. Always address the judge with "your honor" or we'll present you a gazillion dollar fine for not being nice.
lars63
Posts: 2927
Joined: Mon May 15, 2000 7:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by lars63 »

I think that fine is way out of line, seems silly to award that much when the companies involved have already stated they will settle for less.
Member: [url=http://www.nad.org]NAD[/url]&[url=http://www.bta4bikes.org/]BTA[/url]
Your Friendly Neighborhood Quake Addict
r3t
Posts: 701
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:58 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by r3t »

Eraser wrote:
^misantropia^ wrote:I sometimes wonder how a13n's brain is wired.

Back on topic, this broad got slapped with this gargantuan fine because she:

a) appealed when she was already convicted (and obviously guilty)
b) was caught lying during the trial
c) held the jury in contempt

In short, she brought it on herself.
Yes, because that's how justice works. Always address the judge with "your honor" or we'll present you a gazillion dollar fine for not being nice.
I'll take that a step further: if the jury doesn't like how you look, or how you smell, or how you wear a green shirt over purple trousers, your fine will be higher. Great legal system there!
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by xer0s »

What?
^misantropia^
Posts: 4022
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:24 pm

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by ^misantropia^ »

Eraser wrote:Yes, because that's how justice works. Always address the judge with "your honor" or we'll present you a gazillion dollar fine for not being nice.
You appear to have missed points A and B, Eraser.

BTW, I'm due for a job interview at that (ex?)company of yours, this Wednesday. Care for a beer afterwards?
^misantropia^
Posts: 4022
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:24 pm

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by ^misantropia^ »

r3t wrote:or how you wear a green shirt over purple trousers
Are you implying that wearing green over purple shouldn't be a punishable offense?
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by Eraser »

^misantropia^ wrote:You appear to have missed points A and B, Eraser.
Lying in court gets you a 1.9 million dollar fine?
^misantropia^ wrote: BTW, I'm due for a job interview at that (ex?)company of yours, this Wednesday. Care for a beer afterwards?
Nice.
I might. Depends on the time. It's indeed my ex company now so I'm stuck till 6 or so at my new job in Rotterdam.
^misantropia^
Posts: 4022
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:24 pm

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by ^misantropia^ »

Lying in court gets you a 1.9 million dollar fine?
Not just lying but stupidity in general and wasting the court's time.
I might. Depends on the time. It's indeed my ex company now so I'm stuck till 6 or so at my new job in Rotterdam.
I'm from Rotterdam so that's no problem. Where is your office located, Eraser?
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by Eraser »

Near Rotterdam Airport (Zestienhoven).
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by plained »

ok i'm on my way!
it is about time!
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by MKJ »

rofl, rotterdam...
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by brisk »

Exactly how does one pay back $1.9m? More lols from the copyright bullies in America.
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]You might as well have complained about the Mona Lisa right after Michelangelo painted the first two strokes of his brush.[/quote]
User avatar
vesp
Posts: 1337
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2000 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by vesp »

rotterdam, or anywhere
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by xer0s »

brisk wrote:Exactly how does one pay back $1.9m? More lols from the copyright bullies in America.
They'll just take everything she's got and the rest will go into jail time.
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Fuck...my fine would be in the gazillions.
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by xer0s »

The fine isn't relevant to weight...
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Re: $1.9m in damages over 24 downloaded songs

Post by Fender »

OH SNAP!
Post Reply