video players?

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
RLucky82
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 8:00 am

video players?

Post by RLucky82 »

Whats your favorite video players :?:
phantasmagoria
Posts: 8525
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by phantasmagoria »

VLC
[size=85]
RLucky82
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by RLucky82 »

got it thanks! but is there any way to adjust the audio so that at 1.5x speed it doesn't sound like a bunch of chipmunks?
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by Transient »

VLC is indeed the best. It's too bad I somehow managed to break it in Ubuntu. :(
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by seremtan »

phantasmagoria wrote:VLC
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by [xeno]Julios »

RLucky82 wrote:got it thanks! but is there any way to adjust the audio so that at 1.5x speed it doesn't sound like a bunch of chipmunks?
the fuck? what else would it sound like?. If you speed things up, things sound like chipmunks.

Your question is as ridiculous as:

"Is there anyway to adjust the video so that at 1.5x speed things don't move faster?"
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by Fender »

No, Julios, there are ways to pitch adjust audio so that 1.5x audio is simply faster, not higher pitched as well.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by Transient »

I thought VLC did that automatically? Maybe I was using Amarok when I was speeding up my podcasts, I can't remember.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by [xeno]Julios »

Fender wrote:No, Julios, there are ways to pitch adjust audio so that 1.5x audio is simply faster, not higher pitched as well.
ah ok.
RLucky82
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by RLucky82 »

its buried but I finally found it. only after 3 hours of listening to instructional videos that sounded like a bunch of helium huffers! :smirk: its under filters > Scale audio tempo in sync with playback rate.
User avatar
PhoeniX
Posts: 4067
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2000 7:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by PhoeniX »

FFDShow + Windows Media Player / Media Player Classic > VLC.
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by obsidian »

PhoeniX wrote:FFDShow + Windows Media Player / Media Player Classic > VLC.
Just reading your equation seems like more work than simply downloading VLC and playing a video. :sly:
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
EtUL
Posts: 3307
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2001 7:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by EtUL »

I'm not impressed with the last couple builds of vlc. I get a lot of freezing and pixilization and it doesn't like my dual monitors. I went back to like .8.6 I think until they finally release a stable 1.
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by Grudge »

WMP is an abomination, pure shit

VLC or MPC
User avatar
PhoeniX
Posts: 4067
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2000 7:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by PhoeniX »

obsidian wrote:
PhoeniX wrote:FFDShow + Windows Media Player / Media Player Classic > VLC.
Just reading your equation seems like more work than simply downloading VLC and playing a video. :sly:
Heh maybe so.

FFDShow works with other media players though (not VLC), and it allows you to up-scale all your videos to look much better than they originally did plus a number of other things for both video and audio (sharpening, convert audio into Pro Logic etc). VLC doesn't come close in terms of video quality.
Giraffe }{unter
Posts: 2941
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by Giraffe }{unter »

XBMC
DTS
Posts: 2879
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 7:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by DTS »

PhoeniX wrote:FFDShow + Windows Media Player / Media Player Classic > VLC.
If FFDShow is so good why's it still in beta?

I use Media Player Classic primarily, cause it has a better UI, then if it doesn't play in that, an old version of VLC I have (0.8.6).
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by Ryoki »

From what i understand VLC is great if you're a bit of a nerd who likes to get into things a little deeper than someone who has never seen the need to play something at 1.5 times the normal speed whilst keeping the pitch low (what the fuck were you doing..?)

So yeah, i'm gonna say WMP classic with a good codepack. Plays everything, no options, no hassle.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by 4days »

as another alternative to vlc,. kmplayer. has more options than i've ever needed.
http://www.kmplayer.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=25
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Playing WMV's with any of the above players is a pain... and I'm still trying to find a decent one.
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by obsidian »

Ryoki wrote:From what i understand VLC is great if you're a bit of a nerd who likes to get into things a little deeper than someone who has never seen the need to play something at 1.5 times the normal speed whilst keeping the pitch low (what the fuck were you doing..?)
Either you meant to say FDDShow or you're completely wrong about VLC. VLC is about ease of use, just install it and you don't even have to worry about installing any extra tricky codec packs.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by Ryoki »

Ah yes, you are correct.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Plan B
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 8:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by Plan B »

I used to run bsplayer, which still is my second favorite, but vlc just about trumps everything else, in my experience.
As mentioned, it can handle any media file you throw at it 'out of the box', without the need for additional downloads or tweaking.
And at the same time it allows you to customize pretty much anything you like. I never ran into some feature that was lacking.
User avatar
PhoeniX
Posts: 4067
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2000 7:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by PhoeniX »

DTS wrote:If FFDShow is so good why's it still in beta?

I use Media Player Classic primarily, cause it has a better UI, then if it doesn't play in that, an old version of VLC I have (0.8.6).
Google Mail is still 'beta' despite being very stable. It's an open-source project so if there any any bugs they'll get ironed out quickly anyway.
DTS
Posts: 2879
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 7:00 am

Re: video players?

Post by DTS »

PhoeniX wrote:
DTS wrote:If FFDShow is so good why's it still in beta?

I use Media Player Classic primarily, cause it has a better UI, then if it doesn't play in that, an old version of VLC I have (0.8.6).
Google Mail is still 'beta' despite being very stable. It's an open-source project so if there any any bugs they'll get ironed out quickly anyway.
I just realised I already have it installed. I forgot I installed it before. Yeah the picture quality is good. Anyway I have the latest version now.

To those who said it seems over-complicated: You don't have to do anything with it, it works just like any other codec. Sure, there are probably some extra things you can do with it, but I haven't used them AFAIK, and the picture quality is good, like I said.
Post Reply