Do you feel his responses were legitimate? Most of the material I've seen of him suggests he has the intellectual capacity of George W. at about 10 years old.

Star trek.....6/10, I guess it was a sgood as it could be without the actors that had a large part in creating the franchise. It had a lot of puzzling continuity problems. It was definitely not as cerebral as the previous series and movies. It had a lot of action and good special effects. The actors were adequate. It had the usual corny parts. I'll be curious to see what other people thought of it. parts of it were very satisfying and other parts were not.

lol

Well I didn't stick around that long. Do you guys normal stick around until after the credits? Or did you just hear that this movie has something, so you stayed?

Nanking

good documentary about the Japanese's brutal occupation of Nan Jing. Minus points for the Chinese communist government shoving the movie down people's throats trying to make them hate Japan instead of the retarded Chinese government.

10/10

have you seen this one? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8039832.stm

star trek - 8/10. would have been 9 except for a few scenes that felt like they were lifted straight from phantom menace (barf).

Which scenes? Do tell. I didn't notice and saw phantom menace a while ago now, so may have forgotten the link

Which scenes? Do tell. I didn't notice and saw phantom menace a while ago now, so may have forgotten the link

kirk gets chased by monster, bigger monster eats monster, etc.....

hey, at least there weren't any humpback whales. =\

DC at another website:
Id say that Wolverine was everything I expected. If you were expecting a Dark Knight style film then you need a word with yourself. Look at the director and look at what he has worked on; nothing is remotely dark and moody. I would expect that if you gave Wolverine to someone like Alfonso Cuarón then you may have gotten the film you wanted.

This is not to say I am not slightly disappointed with the film. I do feel that the entire section around the inserting of the adamantium into Logan could have had a lot more grit in it as it does come across as slightly wishy-washy. Also the creation of X11 (Deadpool) could have been far more gruesome and commanded a lot more screen time than was given. It was kind of like they sat down and thought Oh we created a super mutant – lets see of he can break the unbreakable man that we know is unable to be killed a little pointless really.

Jackman has played the part of Wolverine well once again, although he does lack some of the brooding and moodiness that he generated in the first film. Even so, hats off to him for training like a beast (ha!) and getting it right for the most part. The inclusion of Gambit is the part of the film I have the most issues with. Gambit, being one of my favourite X-men characters was done an absolute dis-service. Why would you bring Gambit into the Wolverine story when he has had no part in any of the X-men films? Gambit was a member of the blue team of X-men headed by Cyclopes…you can see where that has gone, yes?

Never mind – perhaps the writers of the next film can do a little more research or hire some super nerds to ensure that the script is correct and they dont mess anything else up.

All in all though, as a mindless action film it did the job.

DC

Taken: 7/10 Liam Neeson owns as a tough guy. The beginning dialoguey shit with Famke and his buddies felt retarded and poorly written/directed. Once the ball starts rollin with the kidnapping, it's a fun ride to the finish. I dig revenge flicks as a rule and this one was pretty good.