Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Neither have anything to do with the forums (besides raw who pops in once every 12 months to make sure everyone he banned in December '99 is still banned) and both have freely admitted they are over it.
Should they be replaced by someone like Dark Metal (Dick Measle) who actually does something around here?
Should they be replaced by someone like Dark Metal (Dick Measle) who actually does something around here?
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
- GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
I thought those two had long fucked off and the barn was run by DM and DooMer?
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
raw, Dave and Doomer are the admins. Dark Metal is a Global Moderator.
You are entirely correct though in terms of those who actually run the forum.
You are entirely correct though in terms of those who actually run the forum.
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
i was gonna post something like "another lawl thread crying about the mods", but this seems like a reasonable discussion. 

Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Yeah well I think most already know my stance on the subject, and it's not like anything is going to come of it regardless of the poll results. I'm just interested to see what others think, especially considering polls are anonymous.
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
LawL wrote:(besides raw who pops in once every 12 months to make sure everyone he banned in December '99 is still banned)

-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
raw actually does still play an active role, from what I'm told. Daev, however, must have imploded or died of skinny.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
why don't you remind us all of who raw banned 7 years before you registered? it would really be helpfulLawL wrote:raw who pops in once every 12 months to make sure everyone he banned in December '99 is still banned
everyone he banned in December '99
December '99
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Unfortunately that role consists purely of throwing tantrums when someone he has an eternal e-grudge against has been unbanned.Nightshade wrote:raw actually does still play an active role, from what I'm told. Daev, however, must have imploded or died of skinny.
Why don't you remind us of what life was like during the English Revolution, it would be very insightful.seremtan wrote:why don't you remind us all of who raw banned 7 years before you registered? it would really be helpful
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
why don't you dodge a straightforward question on account of being a faggot? it would be really... predictable
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
I guess garyglittertan forgot who BadMutha was.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
i doubt lawl or testo will remember him.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
No one was banned in the first month the forum was opened that I know of dumbo, I was exaggerating to make a point. You gonna be ok now?seremtan wrote:why don't you dodge a straightforward question on account of being a faggot? it would be really... predictable

I love the way I have you so confused and running in circles. Usernames: serious business.Doombrain wrote:i doubt lawl or testo will remember him.

Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
a fat greek monobrowed retard who went to jail for receiving weed through the post?Nightshade wrote:I guess garyglittertan forgot who BadMutha was.
also, if you think Testo and LawL are the same person, how come you've happily weaved yourself a hammock out of LawL's ass hairs, but not Testo's?
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
LawL wrote:No one was banned in the first month the forum was opened that I know of dumbo, I was exaggerating to make a point. You gonna be ok now?seremtan wrote:why don't you dodge a straightforward question on account of being a faggot? it would be really... predictable

-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
seremtan wrote:a fat greek monobrowed retard who went to jail for receiving weed through the post?Nightshade wrote:I guess garyglittertan forgot who BadMutha was.
also, if you think Testo and LawL are the same person, how come you've happily weaved yourself a hammock out of LawL's ass hairs, but not Testo's?

Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
LawL wrote:
Why don't you remind us of what life was like during the English Revolution, it would be very insightful.


LawL wrote:
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
well this turned sour quick.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
who cares?LawL wrote:Neither have anything to do with the forums (besides raw who pops in once every 12 months to make sure everyone he banned in December '99 is still banned) and both have freely admitted they are over it.
Should they be replaced by someone like Dark Metal (Dick Measle) who actually does something around here?
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
^ I believe that's the purpose of this thread, finding out who cares.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
probably no one except the OP