Battlefield 3

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by MKJ »

you mean they released drivers to fix a game *before* it's released?
whoa
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by scared? »

my birfday is tomorrow...whose getting me this game?...
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by MKJ »

lol at people who cant afford games..
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Tsakali »

if he had a dollar for every shit stained diaper...
User avatar
shaft
Posts: 12473
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by shaft »

Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Tsakali »

some of those characters in the cut scenes look damn impressive!
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Don Carlos »

So people have been bitching about Rage and the low res textures...LULZ!!!!

andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by andyman »

i'm not seeing the problem
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Yeah I don't see the difference at all....

Image
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by tnf »

I need to build a new gaming PC. Have no idea what to get though - haven't even looked at PC hardware for a couple years.
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by andyman »

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Yeah I don't see the difference at all....
not what i said
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by brisk »

Some screenshots I took (ultra detail, everything on full) click to enlarge

[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/ixzuX.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/nBXEh.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/gN6np.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/xw527.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/zK1ie.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/VpQFw.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/ofBSa.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/msW1f.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/YPMDs.jpg[/lvlshot]

Probably the best looking (or at least, most realistic) game on the PC. Smooth as butter too.
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Psyche911 »

tnf wrote:I need to build a new gaming PC. Have no idea what to get though - haven't even looked at PC hardware for a couple years.
techreport.com just published their latest system guide today. Every time a friend is thinking of building a system I recommend they start with this.

http://techreport.com/articles.x/21876

Depends on your budget to some extent, but I would heavily recommend an i5-2500K CPU, your preferred brand Z68 socket 1155 board, and 8GB of RAM. The GPU is where you'll end up cutting back or splurging usually.

I've always bought the fastest video card for the money, regardless of brand, but lately ATI has been having issues (RAGE catastrophe and now they still won't have a final driver until 6 days after BF3 launches). I'm really recommending Nvidia.

If you can afford it, I think the GTX 570 is where it's at. I don't think the 580 offers enough additional performance for the cost. That's what I would buy if I could upgrade right now. If not, the GTX 560 Ti is still good.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Tsakali »

brisk wrote:Some screenshots I took (ultra detail, everything on full) click to enlarge
imgs
actually, I was trying to figure out why it looked odd, and it's the low polycount. Seriously, rage blows these environments away. sure, it might have hand painted surfaces but what also really helps with the realism is the higher polycount, and rage had to be pushing the upper limits on those consoles.
brisk wrote: Probably the best looking (or at least, most realistic) game on the PC. Smooth as butter too.
I think rage wins overall...if you ignore the blurry textures up close, it's kind of hard to beat high polycount, and hand crafted textures.

As for the DX filtering and lighting surroundings superiority, it could possibly go either way.
Big Kahuna Burger
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Big Kahuna Burger »

caring about gfx :olo:
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by andyman »

odiums little brother :olo:
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by brisk »

Tsakail has finally lost it.
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Don Carlos »

But the textures are so low res on the 360 :(
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19176
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Eraser »

No they're not. At least, not if you install the high res pack to HDD, which shouldn't be a problem for anyone.

I doubt that anyone who cares about the texture res is still using an XBox without HDD.
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by fKd »

Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Don Carlos »

Look at my vid on the other page Eraser...
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Don Carlos »

Also enough people bitched about having to change settings in Rage so why is there no malice toward a game that has worse textures on a console unless you install? You didn't need to install BF2 to the 360 and it was better looking that BF3 without the install? Makes no sense...
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19176
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Eraser »

The comparison video? I did, and it shows that if you don't install the 2nd DVD to harddisk your game will have low res textures.

I don't really see what the problem is. If you don't install Rage's 2 DVD's to HDD then you're allegedly getting terrible texture pop-in :shrug:

Also, for your second point, there's quite a difference between PC gamers having no control options to tweak the game and console gamers having to install the game. They're two different crowds to begin with.
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Don Carlos »

It is a console; you shouldnt need to install stuff. I dont have 2 Rage DVD's installed and the pop up is not bad at all?

All I am saying is that there was a song and dance about Rage but nothing about BF3.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19176
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Eraser »

Oh yeah, but that's because it's id Software and it's cool to hate id.

Funnily enough my bro and me were playing Portal 2 coop last weekend and there are quite a few textures in there that are extremely blurry, yet no one was actively looking for those. And of course it wasn't cool to hate on Portal 2 while it is cool to hate on anything done by id Software, so there you go.
Post Reply