Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Discussion for Level editing, modeling, programming, or any of the other technical aspects of Quake
cityy
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:23 am

Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by cityy »

I think we should regularely host small competitions on the forum. Nothing big and serious, just something for hugs and fun (no homo).
I'd love to see a 20 brush competition over christmas (deadline 31st) and maybe a 1024 competition in late january or febuary (duration of 2-4 weeks). Prizes are not needed IMO; the winners can be determined by polls.
How is everyone feeling about this?
www.ferdinandlist.de/leveldesign
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by obsidian »

I approve this message. Though not sure about the time line. I was thinking of doing 20b starting Jan 1. Might give a little more time for people to see this and join. I guess we can see depending on the number of people interested in signing up.

I'll be enforcing the rules, so no sneaking in that 21st brush, I will slap you with it.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Fjoggs
Posts: 2555
Joined: Fri May 03, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by Fjoggs »

I would probably join the "bigger" contests. 20 brush-contests are just too boring imo. :P
skinmaster
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:11 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by skinmaster »

a twenty bush contest should be for prefab creation maybe? flat shaded caulked brushwork ...
themuffinman
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:29 pm

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by themuffinman »

A speed mapping comp could be interesting.
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by obsidian »

I think we should start with 20b. If the turnout is good, we'll host other types.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by Eraser »

I'd dig a 20 brush competition
skinmaster
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:11 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by skinmaster »

i like the 20 brush idea too, makes me wonder about making a transformer map where all twenty bushes change positions.. modifying the "layout" :P
sock
Posts: 424
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by sock »

20 brush-contests are just too boring
20 brush, speed mapping and 1024^3 mapping competitions have been done to death and are indeed not interesting anymore. Maybe try something new, like focus on game play item balance or environmental spaces instead?

Create a map based on :-

* 2 weapon types only like for example SG/RL, PG/LG or GL/SG
* 1 power up, like a Battlesuit, Speed or Regen in a central area
* A restricted set of weapons, ammo, health and armor that everyone must use
* A visual hook, something that perfectly describes the map with a single word or phrase
* A choke point that separates the map into two halves and guards a special item
* A highly vertical environment with low gravity to reduce fall damage
* An environment with lots of water, maybe have fun with water texture alpha blending

All maps should follow the same game type, size and textures so everyone can judge them easier. Plus this will help people that don't have lots of time to spare detailing areas or finding/creating textures.
Well he was evil, but he did build alot of roads. - Gogglor
My [url=http://www.simonoc.com/]Website[/url] & [url=http://twitter.com/SimsOCallaghan]Twitter[/url]
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

sock wrote:
20 brush-contests are just too boring
20 brush, speed mapping and 1024^3 mapping competitions have been done to death and are indeed not interesting anymore. Maybe try something new, like focus on game play item balance or environmental spaces instead?

Create a map based on :-

* 2 weapon types only like for example SG/RL, PG/LG or GL/SG
* 1 power up, like a Battlesuit, Speed or Regen in a central area
* A restricted set of weapons, ammo, health and armor that everyone must use
* A visual hook, something that perfectly describes the map with a single word or phrase
* A choke point that separates the map into two halves and guards a special item
* A highly vertical environment with low gravity to reduce fall damage
* An environment with lots of water, maybe have fun with water texture alpha blending

All maps should follow the same game type, size and textures so everyone can judge them easier. Plus this will help people that don't have lots of time to spare detailing areas or finding/creating textures.
:up:
Kaz
Posts: 1077
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 3:43 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by Kaz »

What he said :up:
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by fKd »

agree
skinmaster
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:11 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by skinmaster »

in a 20 brush would a maxes out sibdivided patch mesh still only count as one brush?
cityy
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:23 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by cityy »

My biggest concern is that if we do something too extensive people will be afraid to join. Thus I'd like to stick to something around the extent of a 20brush comp or a 1024 challenge.
www.ferdinandlist.de/leveldesign
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by Eraser »

How about a competition to create a Horde/Firefight-like map for EntityPlus :D
User avatar
monaster
Posts: 532
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:52 pm

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by monaster »

cityy wrote:My biggest concern is that if we do something too extensive people will be afraid to join. Thus I'd like to stick to something around the extent of a 20brush comp or a 1024 challenge.
True. Plus, we've settled in a long hard fight for quite decent rules regarding the 20b comp back in the days of infernis' leveldesign.nl (not too long ago if anyone remembers). Using these will not only spare us the trouble of setting up a new catalogue of dos and donts (like the subdivided patch mesh issue skinny has mentioned asf), but also attract some people interested in spending some time they usually don't have many of into a small map. This way we can also kinda determine how many people are still left mapping for Q3A every now and then (beside the well-known 15 or 20 regularly posting here).

On a sidenote: Hi sock! :)
If you are caught on a golf course during a storm and are afraid of lightning, hold up a 1-iron. Not even God can hit a 1-iron.
-Lee Trevino, golfer who actually has been struck by lightning.
themuffinman
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:29 pm

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by themuffinman »

Speed mapping isn't too extensive. The only issue would be running it so it's convenient across as many time zones as possible.

20 brush could be extended to 50 brush or so to make it more interesting but still simple.
sock
Posts: 424
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by sock »

Eraser wrote:How about a competition to create a Horde/Firefight-like map for EntityPlus :D
Good idea :up:
Last edited by sock on Thu Dec 22, 2011 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Well he was evil, but he did build alot of roads. - Gogglor
My [url=http://www.simonoc.com/]Website[/url] & [url=http://twitter.com/SimsOCallaghan]Twitter[/url]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by Eraser »

Cool idea, although usually collaborative efforts don't work out really well. But if everyone is working on a completely isolated part of a map, it might just work.

And sure, I'd be definitely willing to help out.
ShadoW_86
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:20 pm

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by ShadoW_86 »

sock wrote:
All maps should follow the same game type, size and textures so everyone can judge them easier. Plus this will help people that don't have lots of time to spare detailing areas or finding/creating textures.
Hmmm, not sure about textures. It's exactly something all should be able to choose, 20b contest is about creativity like nothing else. I could have excellent idea for 20b map which would work only with specific textures or theme, I don't think this type of limitation could improve the results. 20b should be all about creativity and not about means. If a map makes better imporession then another one, it wins :).
[url]http://shadowsdomain.wordpress.com/[/url]
themuffinman
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:29 pm

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by themuffinman »

Bump bump.

There was quite a unique idea for a mapping competition brought up on tastypleen.net a few months ago:
[BTF] Reflex wrote: ...
Have a contest where you are given a .map file with entities only.

Like have armor here, health there, guns here here and here, shards here.. etc.

The object of the contest is to build a map around the entities provided.
...
That'd be different to any previous Q3 mapping competition (afaik), it'd be easy to get going and could yield some interesting results. Thoughts?
Fjoggs
Posts: 2555
Joined: Fri May 03, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by Fjoggs »

Sounds way better then a 20 brush contest atleast. :D I would probably try to enter.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by Eraser »

Or a remix competition. Take an existing map and everyone should remix (redo texturing, lighting, detailing, maybe even allow adding gameplay altering geometry) the map. So you'd get a lot of different versions of the same map but redesigned in unique ways.
cityy
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:23 am

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by cityy »

I like both ideas, though eraser's sounds a bit more interesting to me.
www.ferdinandlist.de/leveldesign
deqer
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:30 pm

Re: Discussion: Q3W LEM competitions

Post by deqer »

I oppose Eraser's idea because I'd rather hit two birds with one stone by having the competition be fun and useful. It's not very useful if you end up with "a lot of different versions of the same map" unless gameplay/geometry is significantly different between the maps to make them less the same, so that you end up with a bunch of useful maps rather a bunch of variations of the same flow of a map; because the flow/gameplay is what matters.
Post Reply