[MAP] KREP1: Carmack Fortress | Quake 3 + EntityPlus

Discussion for Level editing, modeling, programming, or any of the other technical aspects of Quake
deqer
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:30 pm

Re: [MAP] KREP1: Carmack Fortress | Quake 3 + EntityPlus

Post by deqer »

skinNCNmaster wrote:
obsidian wrote:
Too many hard ons??? :olo:

very level editing related there.. yep strong subject related administraitor


and
On top of that, you do not fully grasp the English language and that, to me, is the most important aspect of being a writer.

well then its going to say that anyone who writes in french or any other language is not a good writer either?

czhost, your review waS FAIR.
skinNCNmaster, please stay out of this thread. You never have anything of value to contribute. We do NOT need you to point out what's related and what's not related. We do NOT need you to start a pointless argument about whether czghost's review was fair or not based on nothing--all you've said is a vague statement which opposes what Eraser said but with nothing to back it up your vague statement with.
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: [MAP] KREP1: Carmack Fortress | Quake 3 + EntityPlus

Post by fKd »

everyone needs to just relax, take deep breaths and not hold onto grudges. sure skinNCNmaster is left of field, but hes just trying to help... i think? as to beating up on CZghosts review... not cool team. :/
EmeraldTiger
Posts: 392
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 1:53 am

Re: [MAP] KREP1: Carmack Fortress | Quake 3 + EntityPlus

Post by EmeraldTiger »

fKd wrote:everyone needs to just relax, take deep breaths and not hold onto grudges. sure skinNCNmaster is left of field, but hes just trying to help... i think? as to beating up on CZghosts review... not cool team. :/
I wasn't beating up on CZGhost's review. I was merely saying that it was more of a description of the map rather than telling whether the author liked it or not, what things could have been improved or worked on, etc. I was not saying his review should have been rejected because of less-than-perfect grammar, I just mentioned that Tig corrects it depending on the reviewer's nationality. I was just providing a constructive viewpoint on how the review could have been improved, it's not like I said "it sucks and he shouldn't do reviews anymore".

Klonopin, anyone?
[color=#00FF00][b]EmeraldProductions[/b][/color]
http://emeraldproductions.weebly.com/index.html
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: [MAP] KREP1: Carmack Fortress | Quake 3 + EntityPlus

Post by Eraser »

I think he meant my comments. But I stick by what I said.
Post Reply