Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
MKJ
Posts: 32582 Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by MKJ » Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:53 am
make it so that when you press back, the post reply/quickbox input field isnt cleared?
especially handy when the board tells you yer trying to flood..
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Mat Linnett
Posts: 2483 Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2000 7:00 am
Location: The Grizzly Grotto
Post
by Mat Linnett » Mon Feb 14, 2005 10:51 am
Any chance of the "Copy" function from the old Q3W that copied the URL of a particular post?
Turbanator
Posts: 883 Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
Post
by Turbanator » Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:46 am
MKJ wrote: make it so that when you press back, the post reply/quickbox input field isnt cleared?
especially handy when the board tells you yer trying to flood..
that's todo with your browser, not the board...
MKJ
Posts: 32582 Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by MKJ » Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:51 am
Turbanator wrote: MKJ wrote: make it so that when you press back, the post reply/quickbox input field isnt cleared?
especially handy when the board tells you yer trying to flood..
that's todo with your browser, not the board...
:E i havent changed browsers, only boards
q3w didnt have this problem before either btw, nor did raw-one..
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Turbanator
Posts: 883 Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
Post
by Turbanator » Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:21 pm
MKJ wrote: Turbanator wrote: MKJ wrote: make it so that when you press back, the post reply/quickbox input field isnt cleared?
especially handy when the board tells you yer trying to flood..
that's todo with your browser, not the board...
:E i havent changed browsers, only boards
q3w didnt have this problem before either btw, nor did raw-one..
well, if i post this, and click back on the next screen, everything is still there for me..
MKJ
Posts: 32582 Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by MKJ » Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:36 pm
lemme test
[edit] nope, no dice :E how odd[/edit]
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Eraser
Posts: 19177 Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Eraser » Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:16 am
New Yahoo! Messenger icon. The old one didn't have a transparent background (on the dark post background you can see it's not transparant):
Nightshade
Posts: 17020 Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Nightshade » Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:23 am
Can we set the "Include Signature" checkbox to unchecked as default?
Nightshade[no u]
U4EA
Posts: 2894 Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by U4EA » Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:25 am
You can do that in your profile.
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467 Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by SplishSplash » Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:49 pm
Someone try clicking the "WoW questions" thread.
It seems there are two "General Discussion" links at the top right. It's not a problem, just thought it might interest Turbie or whoever's hacking away at these boards.
Edit: Gone now, nevermind.
MKJ
Posts: 32582 Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by MKJ » Tue Feb 15, 2005 1:17 pm
stop being on crack
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Transient
Posts: 11357 Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am
Post
by Transient » Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:13 pm
"If you build it, they will come."
Fender
Posts: 5876 Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am
Post
by Fender » Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:11 pm
The Yahoo icon does not have a transparent background.
R00k
Posts: 15188 Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by R00k » Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:27 pm
Look 7 posts up.
Turbanator
Posts: 883 Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
Post
by Turbanator » Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:10 pm
if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.
<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">
saturn
Posts: 4334 Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands
Post
by saturn » Wed Feb 16, 2005 6:06 am
I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed?
glossy
Posts: 2282 Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 7:00 am
Post
by glossy » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:01 am
Turbanator wrote: if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.
<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">
remade how? do they need transparent background only, or do you actually want something remade ?
Turbanator
Posts: 883 Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
Post
by Turbanator » Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:04 am
saturn wrote: I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed?
I was thinking about this last night, should we put the topic titles back to unbold (as in ubb q3w)... and what about underlines... underlines look cluttered imho....
Turbanator
Posts: 883 Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
Post
by Turbanator » Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:05 am
glossy wrote: Turbanator wrote: if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.
<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">
remade how? do they need transparent background only, or do you actually want something remade ?
they need the text next to them, and some of them need to be smaller so it all blends together.
U4EA
Posts: 2894 Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by U4EA » Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:13 am
Why does q3w insist on using only 90% of the page width?
Turbanator
Posts: 883 Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
Post
by Turbanator » Wed Feb 16, 2005 12:34 pm
U4EA wrote: Why does q3w insist on using only 90% of the page width?
because we can?
glossy
Posts: 2282 Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 7:00 am
Post
by glossy » Wed Feb 16, 2005 12:55 pm
q3w is a rebel without a cause
rock on!
U4EA
Posts: 2894 Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by U4EA » Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:43 pm
Wasted space innit? We could be using 96% or 98% instead and still have a decent amount of padding.