The JSF debate

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by feedback »

Did someone mention the Chinese?


Image
I HATE FUCKING CHINESE

Anyway, there was a very damning report of the wargames conducted during Iraq/Afghanistan about their new technology. All the new high tech Rumsfeldian garbage was utterly destroyed by the other team when they used any strategy at all.
I love quake!
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by obsidian »

Feedbag and a13n have an almost 100% probability of being BFF. 78% probability of buttsex.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by feedback »

a13n is a chink, so no
I love quake!
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by Ryoki »

*moar bump*

Gary Brecher breaks it down in this amusing article:

http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties ... e-billions
Now let’s move on to advanced math, with lots of extra zeroes, to figure out how much the whole program will cost. We’ll make it a story problem: “If the American people are stupid enough to pay $200 million for each barks-like-a-dog F-35, and they go through with the planned purchase of 2,443 of these flying cash dispensers, how many billions in treasury bonds will we have to sell to the Chinese just to line the pockets of some sleazy Texas congressmen and their contractor pals?”

Let’s see, that’s $200,000,000 X 2,443 = $488600000000. Call it five hundred billion dollars, with tax and gratuity. Half a trillion. Remember that scene in Austin Powers where the UN laughs when Dr Evil demands “one…MILLION…dollars”? Well, at DoD Procurement, they’d laugh even harder if he’d said, “One…BILLION…dollars.” They don’t even get excited until you’re into the hundred-billions. Millions and billions are for little people, like taxes.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19175
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by Eraser »

Boeing is now telling the Canadian government to forget about Lockheed's F-35 and buy their F-18 Super Hornet instead.

Some figures from that article:
The Super Hornet currently sells for about $55 million US apiece; the Pentagon expects the F-35 to cost twice as much — about $110 million. But only 20 per cent of the cost of owning a fighter fleet is the actual sticker price of the planes. Eighty per cent is the operating cost — what it takes to keep them flying. That means everything from pilots and fuel to maintenance and spares.

According to the GAO, the Super Hornet actually costs the U.S. Navy $15,346 an hour to fly. It sounds like a lot — until you see that the U.S. Air Force's official "target" for operating the F-35 is $31,900 an hour. The GAO says it's a little more — closer to $32,500.
Yes sure, that F18 is cheaper to keep in the air, but fifteen thousand dollar an hour? Jesus fucking Christ, it's insane.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by Ryoki »

It's probably the better plane and the more inexpensive one, but it's a moot point, really. In future air wars, victory will go to the side that decided first to remove manned combat planes entirely from it's air force and make the switch to drones.

Sometimes a new tech will make old tech obsolete but it just takes a vicious pummeling to learn it - kind of like how those huge armored battleships were considered an absolute necessity for global dominance in the first decades of the last century until some clever bastard figured out how to sink them by dropping bombs from planes. Still took a few decades for the last of those fucking things to be built after that, and they cost about as much as.... i dunno, Italy thrice over. Nations crippled themselves building those things back in the day, it was hilarious.

It's a combination of hubris, corruption and cognative dissonance i guess. Humans are silly creatures :(
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by seremtan »

Eraser wrote:Hans Hillen, our minister of defense has spewed some more bullshit rhetoric and fear mongering about the JSF. Here's some translated quotes.

About the Dutch government doubting whether or not it should buy F35's:
If we continue to hesitate, others will take the loot.
But of course, we should really do this because... well... others are doing it as well.
The Netherlands is a leading, rich, developed country. If such a country abandons the international community you will pay the price for it in the economy.

You will get less production orders and less employment. Then we have the image of a beggar who is only in for it if we can get something out of it.
He's also convinced we really need a plane like this, because, oh shit, the Russians are coming!
Almost monthly an F16 chases away a russian plane. The world is in such an unbalanced state that if we just give a signal that we don't protect ourselves anymore, we draw the enemy towards us

If we think we can win a war with antiquated hardware or even be threatening to an enemy, we make a big mistake
What a fucking tool. But apparently it's people like him, who still think we're in the middle of the cold war, that decide about shit like this.
there's almost a kind of post-9/11 nostalgia about stuff like this. it's like "remember just after the towers fell? remember how people were so scared, you could go on TV and say the most batshit crazy paranoid things and be taken seriously? those were the days..."

also, use of the term 'international community' by any politician = red flag for bullshit
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by Ryoki »

http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/04/ ... -the-f-35/

A somewhat dry read that details some of the bigger technical problems with the F-35. The entertainment is in details such as:
Given the F-35’s basic design, it’s not just 30mm shells that pose a threat: any 20mm, 7.62mm, 5.56mm round from the ground or fragments from the smallest of shoulder-launched antiaircraft missiles penetrating the F-35’s skin could trigger catastrophic loss of aircraft. The –A and –C variants have massive volumes of fuel surrounding the engine inlets, and the 270-volt electrical system provides ample charge for a fatal spark in the air/fuel mixture. Since the fuel is also being used as a heat sink to cool avionics and other systems (and has considerable trouble doing so on hot summer days), it is already at an elevated temperature. Furthermore, this pre-heated and volatile fuel is being used as the operating liquid in the –B’s “fueldraulic system” that swivels the extremely hot engine exhaust nozzle during STOVL mode. What happens when a stray rifle bullet nicks a fueldraulic line and raw fuel sprays at 4000 psi into the broiling engine bay next to the 1500-1700 degree exhaust nozzle?
and
Vertical-landing ‘pads will be exposed to 1700 deg. F and high velocity (Mach 1) exhaust,’ the report says. The exhaust will melt asphalt and ‘is likely to spall the surface of standard airfield concrete pavements on the first VL.’ (The report leaves to the imagination what jagged chunks of spalled concrete will do in a supersonic blast field.)”
Yes, apparently under the right circumstances this plane can be turned into a fireball by shooting a single bullet at it from a 50 year old rifle. And yes, the plane destroys any surface it lands on vertically, with tremendous risk to anyone in the area, the pilot and the plane itself. It's also not capable of landing on carriers, there's unacceptable lag between the computer and the electronic visor the pilot uses, it cannot defend itself at close range (not that it matters because at this stage every weapon platform fitted on the thing is either completely untested or causes unexpected failures in the plane), the goddamn ejection seats don't work, etc etc etc.

Fuck me gently :olo: Thank god they're a steal at 500 million a piece, can't really go wrong then. :up:
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: The JSF debate

Post by scared? »

Why r u so obsessed with this crap ryokiweirdo?...
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by Ryoki »

Good question, don't know really... I find it fascinating for some reason.

Perhaps it's because scrapping this program could instantly resolve the financial crisis globally. It's powerful stuff and the numbers are mind boggling: if my country bought 2 less planes than they're planning on buying, all the devestating cuts in healthcare, culture and education could be rolled back.

That and i enjoy reading about military stuff i guess. You should see my book collection, it's war war war politics journalism science fiction and yet more stuff on war :up:
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: The JSF debate

Post by scared? »

The financial crisis is capitalism running its course...growth on a finite planet is impossible...so no u...
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: The JSF debate

Post by scared? »

Also technology...sry...
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19175
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by Eraser »

Ryoki wrote:Good question, don't know really... I find it fascinating for some reason.
Because it's a prime example of stupid people running head first into a brick wall.
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: The JSF debate

Post by scared? »

It's more about money and abuse of power by yeah whatever u say nitwit...
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by seremtan »

go re-tile your hovel, dumbo
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: The JSF debate

Post by scared? »

I bet ur over weight... :olo: ...
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by seremtan »

i bet ur a moron...

i win...
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: The JSF debate

Post by scared? »

U lose fatty...
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by seremtan »

you lost the lottery of life when genetics made you a crippled pedo gimp and sent you to live in a swamp with all the other poorons :olo:
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: The JSF debate

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

"crippled pedo gimp"....that'll be my Halloween costume for this year. :up:

I'll need some reference photos. Can u spare a few from your massive porn collection?
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by seremtan »

if you can't find something that fits that description in your own collection, i'll be amazed
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by 4days »

http://www.defensenews.com/article/2013 ... Begin-2017
Norway is set to take delivery of six Joint Strike Fighters in 2017 and repeat the exercise every year until 2024, by which time it will have acquired its full fleet of 52 aircraft, the government announced in Oslo on April 26.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19175
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by Eraser »

I wonder what Norway is going to do with their 52 JSF's. Do a few joyrides up and down the length of the country?
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by Ryoki »

Pretty much. Traditionally Norway guards the northern approach into the atlantic against the evil Ruskies so they always had a rather large air force. Have a look at a map, they control a lot of sky.

Bad news in the sense that it's now politically harder to leave the JSF project for other participants. I'd go into a rant as to why this plane is a shitty interceptor, but i've done similar things a number of times already in this thread so i shall restrain myself.

Also:
Norway recently received assurances from the JSF Joint Executive Steering Board regarding the integration of the Kongsberg-developed Joint Strike Missile in the Block 4 version of the fighter.

“This is important to us mainly from an operational point of view as we need JSM to fulfill our operational requirements. It is also important from an industrial perspective as we believe the sales potential for the missile is significant with several F-35 users,” said Strom-Erichsen.
I speak a bit of Pentagonese, i'll translate; "We told them to make our shiny new missile standard issue so we can sell it to other countries, or we wouldn't take the plane. They agreed."
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: The JSF debate

Post by Ryoki »

This old dude who designed the F-15 doesn't like the F-35 at all

[youtube]mxDSiwqM2nw[/youtube]
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Post Reply