d3 Editing

Post by **bork[e]** » Fri May 06, 2005 6:42 pm

I'm going to play around with doom 3 this weekend and see what happends. One quesion for now, at QeRadaint.com they have the release of ver.1.5.0. Is this the same thing as loading doom and typing in editor. Or is Gtk's totally different?

Post by **Fjoggs** » Fri May 06, 2005 6:43 pm

eh?
Gtk is Gtk, doomED is doomED.
Therefore, no it's not the same thing.
doomED is more like qeradiant 404 IIRC.

Post by **bork[e]** » Fri May 06, 2005 6:46 pm

hmm, thx Fjoggs. :icon32:

Post by **^misantropia^** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:23 am

There's GtkRadiant 1.5.0 (sporting an interface that's totally unlike 1.4.0) which knows how to deal with D3 too.

Post by **Fjoggs** » Sat May 07, 2005 1:03 am

Uh, read his post again.

Post by **^misantropia^** » Sat May 07, 2005 7:41 am

Ow. Well, I was pretty drunk when I replied.

Post by **redfella** » Sat May 07, 2005 5:18 pm

doomEd sucks and gtk owns. So yea, there is a difference.

Post by **AEon** » Sat May 07, 2005 10:49 pm

And I am learning the older I get the more I hate interfaces that differ from what I used to know

GTKradiant 1.2.13 is still my preferred, though I do like flymode via w,a,s,d of Sandbox and Hammer. *That* is the way it *should* be.

... (keyboard remapping possible, though does not work properly for w,s,a,d, tried it).

Ideally one would learn or be able to fully configure ones interface to ones preferences and be able to stick with it. But that won't happen. Just thinking about the more professional modelling tools make my head swim.

But from recent tests, GTKradiant 1.5 looks very promissing. I am probably most happy about the fact that something is being done at all. Sandbox is Sandbox and Hammer is Hammer, changes will not likely happen. Whereas some whining with SPoG may actually get you somewhere

</whine mode off>

Post by **redfella** » Sun May 08, 2005 1:48 am

mmm Sandbox. that's a great editor.