Mac Pro 2013

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
cityy
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:23 am

Mac Pro 2013

Post by cityy »

Sweet piece of tech.
http://www.apple.com/mac-pro/
www.ferdinandlist.de/leveldesign
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by Ryoki »

Certainly looks slick :up:
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by Eraser »

lol? It's a trash can?
cityy
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:23 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by cityy »

Yea that was my first thought as well.
www.ferdinandlist.de/leveldesign
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by Eraser »

Must say it's got a really nice small form factor, but the shape of it doesn't seem too practical.
cityy
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:23 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by cityy »

I think what is awesome about it is the computing power that comes with this small size. Can bring it to the office/university/family/friends without problems.
www.ferdinandlist.de/leveldesign
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by obsidian »

My initial thought was R2D2. 9.9" tall, 6.6" diameter, that's tiny. As far as shape goes, it's probably quite good for cooling since the center is a giant triangular heatsink for CPU and dual GPUs, forming a small wind tunnel. Support for x3 4K displays!

Only downside is most professionals will have to spend a fair bit on extra accessories for Thunderbolt cables (not cheap), hard drive racks and other peripherals. I think its success depends heavily on what Apple will be charging for this "Built in USA" hardware as people are forced to rely on external expansion.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by Pext »

*fapfapfap*
Don Carlos
Posts: 17513
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by Don Carlos »

Oh look. A mac.
User avatar
Mat Linnett
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2000 7:00 am
Location: The Grizzly Grotto

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by Mat Linnett »

I like the look of thing, but given where Apple appear to be going with OS X, I'm not sure it'll gain much of a foothold in the video / film industry.

Final Cut X is pretty much the laughing stock of the industry at the moment, having earned the nickname "iMovie Pro". We still get forlorn customers asking us if the old version is still available and if it's being supported on more recent OS releases.

Enterprise-wise, they've completely ditched the Xserve while rolling Xsan into the OS. Interest in implementing Xsan has subsequently dropped into almost non-existence. And running the metadata controller for a SAN on a platform with no redundant power supply is just, well, FUCKING STUPID. So this new machine has no niche there.

Looking at the way the thing's put together, I'm guessing that much like the recent MacBooks, what you buy is going to be what you're stuck with, with minimal components being upgradeable, if any.

But let's be serious here. Apple aren't really interested in the "Professional" market anymore. They make comparatively little there when compared to how much they get from consumer devices such as the iPhone & iPad.

Who are they really aiming at here besides hipsters and Nathan Barley clones?
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by bitWISE »

I would have gone with a round-edged triangular case to match the internal frame. Not sure how I feel about the shared cooling either since any one component will increase the overall heat of the others.
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by scared? »

What kind of moron cares what their computer looks like?... I'm looking at the monitor when I use it...
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by losCHUNK »

bitWISE wrote:Not sure how I feel about the shared cooling either since any one component will increase the overall heat of the others.
True, all components are being cooled though ?

It's neat, as a fancy case :]
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36018
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by seremtan »

scared? wrote:What kind of moron cares what their computer looks like?...
it's a Mac

2 + 2 = ? moron?
menkent
Posts: 2629
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by menkent »

setting the aesthetic aside, that's a lot of computer in a very small package. if they price it under $2000 it would be tempting... but since current gen MacPros run $2500-3800 i'm thinking it's not for me.
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by obsidian »

Under $2000, not likely with that kind of hardware. It would be tempting if it started at $2500.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
shaft
Posts: 12473
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by shaft »

hot
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by Captain »

So it looks like a trashcan but isn't nearly as useful as one. Cool.
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by plained »

Mat Linnett wrote:I like the look of thing, but given where Apple appear to be going with OS X, I'm not sure it'll gain much of a foothold in the video / film industry.

Final Cut X is pretty much the laughing stock of the industry at the moment, having earned the nickname "iMovie Pro". We still get forlorn customers asking us if the old version is still available and if it's being supported on more recent OS releases.

Enterprise-wise, they've completely ditched the Xserve while rolling Xsan into the OS. Interest in implementing Xsan has subsequently dropped into almost non-existence. And running the metadata controller for a SAN on a platform with no redundant power supply is just, well, FUCKING STUPID. So this new machine has no niche there.

Looking at the way the thing's put together, I'm guessing that much like the recent MacBooks, what you buy is going to be what you're stuck with, with minimal components being upgradeable, if any.

But let's be serious here. Apple aren't really interested in the "Professional" market anymore. They make comparatively little there when compared to how much they get from consumer devices such as the iPhone & iPad.

Who are they really aiming at here besides hipsters and Nathan Barley clones?
i have a minty fcp 1.0 in the box mint!! :eek: it came with a secret super version of quicktime a 4.beta something, what made it special was it could output to firewire !! no official version has ever done that and 4.b only came on the very first fcp1.0 disks!

macs used to be for 10% of the people

now theyre for 90% of the people.

obviously the product has changed focus.

this was absolutely horrible to me!

ive had years to get over it tho and now i get a right good laugh when i see people photoing at events useing an ipad, or old people (or young) poking and dragging away like an idiot at an ipad ! lol
it is about time!
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by obsidian »

iFixit's teardown of the new Mac Pro's power supply and heatsink...

Image




I thought that looked oddly familiar, so a few minutes in Photoshop...

Image

"You underestimate the power supply unit of the dark side..."

Unit is surprisingly serviceable and upgradable.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36018
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by seremtan »

on the other hand...

NOOOOOOOOOOOOO \o/
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5982
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by Κracus »

obsidian wrote:Under $2000, not likely with that kind of hardware. It would be tempting if it started at $2500.
Meh... I think that's a bit overpriced for a device that'll be obsolete in 5 years and worth a 10th of it's current price. That's my main problem with most electronics though, the drop in value vs what they do for me don't add up hence why I haven't bought a new PC in over a decade. If it kept it's value or was useful for a bit longer I wouldn't be as opposed to plunking down so much cash on a device.

edit: The exception to the above however is when it helps with your work and you actually make money using the tool.
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by obsidian »

Κracus wrote:The exception to the above however is when it helps with your work and you actually make money using the tool.
Who else buys workstations? People who want to browse Facebook?


Κracus wrote:I think that's a bit overpriced for a device that'll be obsolete in 5 years and worth a 10th of it's current price.
LOL... same could be said about your GTI that's not a Golf.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by plained »

scared? wrote:What kind of moron cares what their computer looks like?... I'm looking at the monitor when I use it...
qfft!
it is about time!
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5982
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Mac Pro 2013

Post by Κracus »

Morons buy systems like that all the time and then use like 1% of it's capabilities then complain to me when youtube videos don't work.

As for my car, honestly with the problems I've had with it the last week I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't worth much in 5 years...
Post Reply