Whiskey 7 wrote:GONNAFISTYA & LawL
You may have missed my point. I don't wish to own that weaponry, shit I have had a few in my time. I am miffed I cannot again experience the thrill of live fire of auto weapons. I was an excellent clay pigeon shooter at one time and I loved the challenge. I was also in a Queenland Medal Rifle Shooting Team before most of you noobs were born
If you wish to fire automatic weapons, then simply travel to a country where it's legal and blow your load for a day or two. A friend of mine in Denmark did exactly that: went to a shooting range in Croatia to fire MP5s and AK47s during a long weekend. He said he had a blast. I'd recommend you plan your next vacation for something like that if you miss it that much.
Whiskey 7 wrote:Question in return if I may?
Have you ever experienced the thrill (IMO) of live firing automatic shotguns, add double barrel/pumps if you like, a range of rifles (22 cal to 303/308)
Yes. I grew up in the redneck part of Canada and I've fired many weapons many times...including a muzzle loader. I wasn't on a Medal Rifle Shooting Team, but I'm a very good shot. But I never owned anything more powerful than a CO2 pellet gun....which I promptly sold once I grew out of adolescence. In other words...unlike 15 year-olds running on testosterone and redneck hillbillies, most people aren't ga-ga about gun guns.
Whiskey 7 wrote:even machine guns and add ARs if you like again? What of real rocket launchers? I have and thankfully not in war. All in supervised range environments. Every really thrown hand grenades. Every choked on teargas? Dressed in full riot gear and practiced pacifying an ugly crowd
I think not.
No...and I have no desire to. I'd love to shoot a machine gun, but I'd never want to own one and I'd never feel disappointed for not owning one.
As I said, I grew up shooting guns and I'm very comfortable around them, regardless of what gramps thinks. I simply disagree that people need to carry them for protection "wherever their car goes" and think that anyone who feels the need to carry in public is paranoid or at the very least has a screw loose. I also disagree that just because you have a right to own them doesn't mean you should. I'm sorry but simply stating "I have a right to carry" is nothing more than stating a lame excuse for something you desire to do anyways. If armed robbery ever became legal I doubt I'd actually go out and do it "because I can". The reason I wouldn't is the same reason I wouldn't carry a gun: civilized societies have deemed them inappropriate actions for community peace.
And before gramps goes and talks about the gun laws of the US...I said "civilized countries".
Whiskey 7 wrote:I plead ignorance on the state of Canada and any gun laws it may have.
Fair enough but don't think that because you can't own a howitzer doesn't mean that "big bad government" is infringing upon your rights. They're simply making rules that allow for everyone to feel safe, not just a few gun nuts.
Whiskey 7 wrote:@dubz You're not listening. Who mentions going armed in public with intent?
Uh....gramps does. Maybe not intent as in pre-meditated, but gramps does indeed mean business if he feels threatened. He's stated it several times...it's not hard to miss.