Quake3World

Looks just fine to me. Good work

bitWISE wrote:

inolen wrote:

bitWISE wrote:I'm working on C# right now but I will have to check that out.

The pain.

I'm learning it merely for the ASP.NET side of things. What have you noticed about it that is bad?

I used it to write a map editor for my Mario 2.5d project (http://www.inolen.com). I guess overall it was better than having to use MFC, but I didn't really care for the way pointers were done.

c# ain't bad. I'm writing a windows form program--an email newsletter program-- with it right now. It's nice to be able to think up a cool feature that you want to add, and be able to implement it without much hassle. The biggest downside is that it's slow and you don't get that silky smoothness when opening and closing windows and controls that you would with a c++ based prog.

inolen wrote: I used it to write a map editor for my Mario 2.5d project (http://www.inolen.com). I guess overall it was better than having to use MFC, but I didn't really care for the way pointers were done.

Nice work man! You always make me feel like such a waste because your so damn good. Gets me motivated though.

bitWISE wrote:

inolen wrote: I used it to write a map editor for my Mario 2.5d project (http://www.inolen.com). I guess overall it was better than having to use MFC, but I didn't really care for the way pointers were done.

Nice work man! You always make me feel like such a waste because your so damn good. Gets me motivated though.

I just got back programming after roofing all summer. I decided I was too lazy to do shit like that the rest of my life.

please change the navigation font
maybe a sans-serif font

looks great, man

I woldn't change anything, the fonts fits the style IMO

sirstrongbad wrote:hehehe. once you start laying out your site designs in css rather than tables, you'll never want to go back. it's SO much easier to debug.

Tables are horrible :icon23:

MKJ wrote:please change the navigation font
maybe a sans-serif font

are the link fonts difficult for you to read? i picked a font that i thought the majority of people had and one that i particularly liked.

dzjepp, i replied to your message.

thanks for the comments, everyone! :icon25:

no theyre not difficult to read, but it kinda looks out of place there as part of the header.

that font looks good for the content though :icon14:

oh okay- i gotcha. hang on and let me change the stylesheet real fast. take a look at it now. switched the navigation links to Arial.

:icon14: much better imo.
it creates a more defined line of "content" and "header"

okay. i'll leave it that way, then.

heh. dont do it for my sake sir. if you feel the other font was better go with that. im just an outsider