Looking for Some Web Site Beta Testers

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
sirstrongbad
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2000 7:00 am

Looking for Some Web Site Beta Testers

Post by sirstrongbad »

hey guys, here's the deal- i've got a site that's my online portfolio that i've been forwarding to potential clients and employers. i need a couple of you to come and check things out and make sure everything's working okay. as an added incentive, my photo gallery has some nice 1600x1200 wallpapers that you can download. :)

any and all feedback you could give me would be greatly appreciated.

http://graphicintegrity.net
Guest

Post by Guest »

Stop trying to make money, you're making me feel bad for myself.
sirstrongbad
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by sirstrongbad »

it's not my perogative- it's my wife's. :icon33:
Guest

Post by Guest »

:mad:
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Post by losCHUNK »

sirstrongbad wrote:it's not my perogative- it's my wife's. :icon33:
are you a man or a mouse :icon34:
sirstrongbad
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by sirstrongbad »

a man driven by a money-crazed woman... :clownboat:
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

Looks great man. The only thing I would suggest is setting your table height to 100% because on the portfolio page it doesn't reach the bottom for me.
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Post by losCHUNK »

thats fair enough
sirstrongbad
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by sirstrongbad »

bitWISE wrote:Looks great man. The only thing I would suggest is setting your table height to 100% because on the portfolio page it doesn't reach the bottom for me.
this is something that i've been trying to fix. i have the main container set to the css value "min-height:100%;", but it won't extend. i'm tempted to cheat and add a spacer down there that will give it extra length. but that would be a total hack. note that there are NO tables on the site that i know of. :)
sirstrongbad
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by sirstrongbad »

also, if any of you want 1600x1200 versions of my photos that don't have a link at the bottom of the view_photo page, let me know. i'll make them available...
Guest

Post by Guest »

What camera are you using?
sirstrongbad
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by sirstrongbad »

canon digital rebel 300D with stock lens and a quantaray 75-300mm telephoto
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

sirstrongbad wrote:
bitWISE wrote:Looks great man. The only thing I would suggest is setting your table height to 100% because on the portfolio page it doesn't reach the bottom for me.
this is something that i've been trying to fix. i have the main container set to the css value "min-height:100%;", but it won't extend. i'm tempted to cheat and add a spacer down there that will give it extra length. but that would be a total hack. note that there are NO tables on the site that i know of. :)
Oh IC. Just crazy CSS shit. Can't help ya.
sirstrongbad
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by sirstrongbad »

hehehe. once you start laying out your site designs in css rather than tables, you'll never want to go back. it's SO much easier to debug.
Guest

Post by Guest »

sirstrongbad wrote:canon digital rebel 300D with stock lens and a quantaray 75-300mm telephoto
Get a decent standart length (~24-30mm) lens, you might go somewhere :icon14:
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

sirstrongbad wrote:hehehe. once you start laying out your site designs in css rather than tables, you'll never want to go back. it's SO much easier to debug.
Yeah. I'm starting to move that way but I just never have time to research anymore. Whenever I have time at home I don't feel like doing anything.
sirstrongbad
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by sirstrongbad »

ToxicBug wrote:
sirstrongbad wrote:canon digital rebel 300D with stock lens and a quantaray 75-300mm telephoto
Get a decent standart length (~24-30mm) lens, you might go somewhere :icon14:
i just got word tonight that i am now a new employee for Fry's Electronics as a camera salesman. upon further inspection of their wares, i noticed that they have a very nice selection of canon lenses. paired with a nice little employee discount, i may just find myself bringing one of them home with me. :icon25:
sirstrongbad
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by sirstrongbad »

bitWISE wrote:
sirstrongbad wrote:hehehe. once you start laying out your site designs in css rather than tables, you'll never want to go back. it's SO much easier to debug.
Yeah. I'm starting to move that way but I just never have time to research anymore. Whenever I have time at home I don't feel like doing anything.
i also didn't really have a lot of time to learn it- it doesn't take too long, really. i grabbed the book called "HTML Utopia: Designing Without Using Tables" and that had some very nice tutorials for getting started.
inphlict
Posts: 1656
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by inphlict »

It looks really good, I don't see any problems with it on firefox. I also like how everything flows and links change fast, etc. Good work.
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

I'm working on C# right now but I will have to check that out.
denzii
Posts: 426
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:02 am

Post by denzii »

sirstrongbad
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by sirstrongbad »

denzii wrote:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fgraphicintegrity.net%2F
i know... don't remind me... :icon33:
inolen
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 1999 8:00 am

Post by inolen »

bitWISE wrote:I'm working on C# right now but I will have to check that out.
The pain.
denzii
Posts: 426
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:02 am

Post by denzii »

sirstrongbad wrote:
denzii wrote:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fgraphicintegrity.net%2F
i know... don't remind me... :icon33:
It looks good though, Better then I can do. :)
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

inolen wrote:
bitWISE wrote:I'm working on C# right now but I will have to check that out.
The pain.
I'm learning it merely for the ASP.NET side of things. What have you noticed about it that is bad?
Post Reply