Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:03 pm
by Underpants?
strange how adults are becoming less accountable in their actions and children more?

In Colorado, a dozen or so teens have received life imprisonment in the past 5 years.

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:05 pm
by Tsakali_
Underpants? wrote:
In Colorado, a dozen or so teens have received life imprisonment in the past 5 years.
for what?

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:07 pm
by Underpants?
the latest one for manslaughter, I believe he pointed a gun at another kid's head at which point it went off...

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:08 pm
by MKJ
well, fair play in that case
although the people to whom the gun was registered should be prosecuted as well

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:14 pm
by R00k
Underpants? wrote:strange how adults are becoming less accountable in their actions and children more?

In Colorado, a dozen or so teens have received life imprisonment in the past 5 years.
I was just talking to a coworker about this yesterday.

I don't understand how people can expect these kind of things to stop happening if parents and guardians aren't held accountable for what their children do.

It's amazing. When there is a kid who brings a gun to school, for instance, the child gets sent off to Juvie, expelled or whatever, probably worsening the kid's outlook. Meanwhile the parents are upset because their kid has to be shipped off.
But I haven't heard of any instances yet where the parents get in any kind of trouble for just leaving a gun lying around where a kid can get to it.

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:17 pm
by Tsakali_
Underpants? wrote:at which point it went off...
lol is that the way his lawyer interpret it?
and yeah the owner's gun should have something to explain.
but but it all depends, I know for a fact teenagers are capable of getting a hold of a gun from the streets at which point his parents failed, the kid is a punk and do to his paren't lack of control the kid has to lose his freedom. No other way around it, most kids like that never change because there is no incentive.

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:22 pm
by Captain
GONNAFISTYA wrote::olo:

I think that 4 year old should be locked away for life and castrated....just in case.
He might hug again :olo:

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:05 pm
by phantasmagoria
mmmmmm boobies

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:45 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
CASTRATION!!!

DOUBLE CASTRATION!!!

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:05 pm
by Big Kahuna Burger
it was an in-school suspension. so basically it was a day of detention for something he did wrong, even if it is extreme for feelin some tits.

why is this national news again?

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:06 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
it was one of those creepy hugs, not a nice hug.

Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:59 pm
by Massive Quasars
well it was nice for him, one of those comfortable busty hugs, part of the joy of childhood I say

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 12:28 am
by R00k
Big Kahuna Burger wrote:it was an in-school suspension. so basically it was a day of detention for something he did wrong, even if it is extreme for feelin some tits.

why is this national news again?
Aside from bullying or not sharing, I can't imagine any reason to give a 4-year-old any kind of detention. Certainly not just for being nice.

Yet you make it sound so reasonable. :olo:

niicceeeeeeeeeee

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:33 am
by Grandpa Stu

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:45 am
by Big Kahuna Burger
R00k wrote:
Big Kahuna Burger wrote:it was an in-school suspension. so basically it was a day of detention for something he did wrong, even if it is extreme for feelin some tits.

why is this national news again?
Aside from bullying or not sharing, I can't imagine any reason to give a 4-year-old any kind of detention. Certainly not just for being nice.

Yet you make it sound so reasonable. :olo:
lol. i think its ridiculous to give a 4 year old detention but its not completely out of line by any means.
news articles on '4 year old gets a timeout' seem to be hard to find these days

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:59 am
by ajm113
That kind of punishment? Hes just 4! A time out would be simple. After all kids around the ages of 1 and 4 are still in the area for them to try to feel, smell, touch, and etc with things. They dont really know whats right and wrong in life.

Whats next?
LOL

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 3:25 am
by R00k
Big Kahuna Burger wrote:
R00k wrote:
Big Kahuna Burger wrote:it was an in-school suspension. so basically it was a day of detention for something he did wrong, even if it is extreme for feelin some tits.

why is this national news again?
Aside from bullying or not sharing, I can't imagine any reason to give a 4-year-old any kind of detention. Certainly not just for being nice.

Yet you make it sound so reasonable. :olo:
lol. i think its ridiculous to give a 4 year old detention but its not completely out of line by any means.
news articles on '4 year old gets a timeout' seem to be hard to find these days
It's news because they tried to charge a 4-year-old with sexual harassment. :olo:

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 4:10 am
by stocktroll
yall noobs dont want double standards so here it is
if a teacher was hugging a kid parents will be flipping out

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 4:23 am
by werldhed
Only stupid, uptight, worthless parents.

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 4:36 am
by tnf
stocktroll wrote:yall noobs dont want double standards so here it is
if a teacher was hugging a kid parents will be flipping out
Not a teacher hugging a 4 year old. Happens all the time.

But thanks for the insight.

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:32 am
by R00k
stocktroll wrote:yall noobs dont want double standards so here it is
if a teacher was hugging a kid parents will be flipping out
Even if that were the case, there is a reason it is different.

Four year olds don't have sexual urges.

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 7:46 am
by S@M
Massive Quasars wrote:well it was nice for him, one of those comfortable busty hugs, part of the joy of childhood I say
F1 there MQ

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 8:16 am
by Ryoki
Big Kahuna Burger wrote:it was an in-school suspension. so basically it was a day of detention for something he did wrong, even if it is extreme for feelin some tits.

why is this national news again?
International news buddy, it was all over the press.

Because the thought of a four year old getting punished in any way for sexual intimidation makes sane people laugh hysterically. I'm surprised some people in this thread feel the child should be punished, but it's the severity of the punishment that is ridiculous - jesus christ, the kid is four. He doesn't know any better.

If anyone should be punished it's the aide. If this makes her uncomfortable she shouldn't be working with young children.

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 8:46 am
by MKJ
she should be punished for bringing it up, more like

younguns squeeze tits, its a fact. and the complaint wasnt even "groping", it was "touching a breast during a hug"
fucking hell

Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:02 am
by tnf
she knows she wanted it.