Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:54 pm
That's what I was getting at. These fagets don't even know where HL came from. :icon33:MKJ wrote:halo doesnt have a rail. unless their talking about the laser sniper rifle
q2 is where its at bitches
Your world is waiting...
https://www.quake3world.com/forum/
That's what I was getting at. These fagets don't even know where HL came from. :icon33:MKJ wrote:halo doesnt have a rail. unless their talking about the laser sniper rifle
q2 is where its at bitches
aye. the same guns that failed to protect Reach. not worthy of the rail title :icon32:Grudge wrote:I think they are referring to the huge MAC guns used by the UNSC ships and orbital defenses. You jump around on the outside of one of them on in the beginning of Halo 2.MKJ wrote:halo doesnt have a rail. unless their talking about the laser sniper rifle
q2 is where its at bitches
if those calc's are true, then it would be somthing to debate, the wind resistance on the projectile alone would/should be enough to degrade it long before it hits anything other then the wind.Grudge wrote:not very far, the projectile would evaporate and more or less turn into plasma upon impact (much like a tank shell does), and energy will spread explosively in every direction
The effect is really no different from using a high explosive, except that you won't need any explosives, it's just kinetic energy
hahahaseremtan wrote:i think the US Navy should put it somewhere awkward, make people strafe jump to get it or something