The role of the law is to protect the innocent, and the way paedophillia laws are being enforced in amerika is the complete opposite when cases like this come up. If she goes on trial it will probably be a hundered times more damaging than her taking nudey photos of herself in the first place.
"America - a nation of laws; badly written and randomly enforced"
She just needs parenting, more than anything else. She doesn't need the law to get involved.
omg, girl charged for sex abuse on herself
-
Massive Quasars
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
That went out the window with the liberty and rule of law fad.LBt1st wrote:Whatever happened to, "no victim no crime"?
-Bean
Though as I suggested earlier, I think it was appropriate for the authorities to get involved to end this exposure because it could've led to a meeting with a pedo at some point in the future. Beyond that, it ought remain a private matter between parents, daughter and the appropriate counsellors.
The other issue is, she is creating an environment that is conducive to pedoism. She's allowing a pedo to get their fix, just like a meth head like tnf shops around for cold medicine, and this fix sustains and ultimately intensifies their pedoism. Thanks to the bravery and courage of police and lawmakers, this is put to a stop. These pedo people will not get their fix, and, because pedoism is just a pathogen, they will be cured of their disease in a couple of weeks.
There are a lot of things about all the pedo cases going on that don't really take into account all the facets of the issue.
I am all for finding pedos who knowingly try to hook up with underage kids, and prosecuting them -- but I'd like to see a healthy does of psychological treatment to go along with that.
If a 16 year old girl goes to Mardi Gras and takes her clothes off in the street, can (and should) she be prosecuted for that?
What's the practical difference between a 16 year old girl and an 18 year old girl, when it comes to making decisions about exposing themselves to others?
For the legal sake of prosecuting actual pedos, it makes sense to have an arbitrary age limit imposed to determine adult from child (although I've always thought it was a gray area in many cases) -- but when it comes to girls exposing themselves, how is this productive?
I am all for finding pedos who knowingly try to hook up with underage kids, and prosecuting them -- but I'd like to see a healthy does of psychological treatment to go along with that.
I thought about this when I read the story as well.mjrpes wrote:The other issue is, she is creating an environment that is conducive to pedoism. She's allowing a pedo to get their fix, just like a meth head like tnf shops around for cold medicine, and this fix sustains and ultimately intensifies their pedoism. Thanks to the bravery and courage of police and lawmakers, this is put to a stop. These pedo people will not get their fix, and, because pedoism is just a pathogen, they will be cured of their disease in a couple of weeks.
If a 16 year old girl goes to Mardi Gras and takes her clothes off in the street, can (and should) she be prosecuted for that?
What's the practical difference between a 16 year old girl and an 18 year old girl, when it comes to making decisions about exposing themselves to others?
For the legal sake of prosecuting actual pedos, it makes sense to have an arbitrary age limit imposed to determine adult from child (although I've always thought it was a gray area in many cases) -- but when it comes to girls exposing themselves, how is this productive?
thats a good point, but kids younger than 18 are legally the property of their parents so, with parental consent, this could be ok?R00k wrote:There are a lot of things about all the pedo cases going on that don't really take into account all the facets of the issue.
I am all for finding pedos who knowingly try to hook up with underage kids, and prosecuting them -- but I'd like to see a healthy does of psychological treatment to go along with that.
I thought about this when I read the story as well.mjrpes wrote:The other issue is, she is creating an environment that is conducive to pedoism. She's allowing a pedo to get their fix, just like a meth head like tnf shops around for cold medicine, and this fix sustains and ultimately intensifies their pedoism. Thanks to the bravery and courage of police and lawmakers, this is put to a stop. These pedo people will not get their fix, and, because pedoism is just a pathogen, they will be cured of their disease in a couple of weeks.
If a 16 year old girl goes to Mardi Gras and takes her clothes off in the street, can (and should) she be prosecuted for that?
What's the practical difference between a 16 year old girl and an 18 year old girl, when it comes to making decisions about exposing themselves to others?
For the legal sake of prosecuting actual pedos, it makes sense to have an arbitrary age limit imposed to determine adult from child (although I've always thought it was a gray area in many cases) -- but when it comes to girls exposing themselves, how is this productive?
you're misinterpreting him. JESUS do you people not see how ridiculous this shit is?tnf wrote:Disregarding the issues with this case, MQ it sounds a bit like you don't agree with extremely aggressive pursuit of pedophiles? Is there a philosophical reason for this, or am I misinterpreting your post?
Thinking about any of this "case" in legal terms is retarded. She's 15. 15. 15.
Christ.
[color=red]You're Pretty When I'm Drunk[/color]