Page 2 of 3
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:07 am
by shaft
calm your tits Jerry
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:19 pm
by Plan B
Looks cool.
Don't really like how the mech can apparently be taken out with just 2 missiles, though.
I understand the "hot potato" idea, where once you enter a mech you become the main focus of destructive attention, but they should be made a bit more sturdy.
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:20 pm
by scared?
When cod changed from cod1-2 style to cod4...it was totally like quake...
U morons must have sucked at quake...

...
Also...if u still play quake ur a moron...
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:24 pm
by Transient
Plan B wrote:Looks cool.
Don't really like how the mech can apparently be taken out with just 2 missiles, though.
I understand the "hot potato" idea, where once you enter a mech you become the main focus of destructive attention, but they should be made a bit more sturdy.
Yeah. What's the point in calling down a mech if you're just going to draw everyone's attention and then get killed in a few shots? It reminds me of playing Battlefield 1942 and running halfway across the map to grab a tank, only to get bombed by some asshole in a plane camping the spawn point.

Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:34 pm
by Eraser
Maybe there were others shooting at the mech as well? They could be more sturdy than the trailer makes them appears.
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:15 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
Oh hey look the latest version of BF3 is coming but for some reason they're calling it BF4.
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:24 pm
by Psyche911
Memphis wrote:GONNAFISTYA wrote:
Oh hey look the latest maps of BF3 is coming but for some reason they're calling it BF4.
fixT
Except they're recycling a bunch of maps too.
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:27 am
by GONNAFISTYA
Psyche911 wrote:Except they're recycling a bunch of maps too.
I guess BF and CoD will ultimately be nothing more than just like another "sports" franchise wherein you
buy the same game over and over but, as usual, they keep somehow convincing enough rubes it's worth buying again at full price so they can keep making a profit.
Seriously...I wouldn't be so offended by this charade if they only charged a "sequel fee" of about $10 and I'd renew every year. No prob. Hell, I'd even pay full price if they released every 2 or 3 years but put out a REALLY good game after working on it for a time. But charging me full price for "mostly recycled" every few months is an insult to say the least and waters down the brand.
Fuck marketing/profit whores.
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:35 am
by scared?
GONNAFISTYA wrote:
Seriously...I wouldn't be so offended by this charade if they only charged a "sequel fee" of about $10 and I'd renew every year. No prob.
Lol poor ppl...
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:41 am
by GONNAFISTYA
Of course an unemployed person wouldn't understand the concept of value when wifey is paying the bills.
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 1:43 am
by scared?
Only a poor person would complain about spending money on video games...

...
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:19 am
by Ryoki
Looks interesting...
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:43 am
by shaft
It's fun, faaaast...especially the ctf.
The matchmaking sucks balls though..unless you have a party of friends. If you play solo be prepared to get matched against another party while your team is made up of solo rejects dropping and joining the entire round because of the lopsided ass pounding. They need to only match parties with other parties and/or swaps around players after a round. This type of shit is inexcusable for a $60 AAA title.
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 8:58 am
by Eraser
shaft wrote:This type of shit is inexcusable for a $60 AAA title.
Battlefield 4 says "what?

"
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 3:00 pm
by scared?
Meanwhile PlayStation 4 is crushing xbone in sales...
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:20 pm
by shaft
Eraser wrote:shaft wrote:This type of shit is inexcusable for a $60 AAA title.
Battlefield 4 says "what?

"
Irrelevant. Completely different multiplayer systems and player counts. Also BF4 servers have team balance and shuffles by squads. It's obvious you haven't played either game.
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:21 pm
by MKJ
scared? wrote:Meanwhile PlayStation 4 is crushing xbone in sales...
Meanwhile Big Macs are crushing sirloin steaks in sales..
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 4:42 am
by scared?
Lol u think xbone is good? My kids and their friends got bored with it after a week and went back to their PC's or 360's...until I got ps4..they're still using it after months...
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:15 am
by MKJ
I don't, I'm just saying sale numbers don't mean anything.
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 8:14 am
by scared?
Sometimes they actually do... Dipshit...
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 8:19 am
by MKJ
Unless the game only available on one of the two platforms. Then it doesn't affect anything.
moron alert.
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 1:48 pm
by scared?
Cept ps4 doesn't have that annoying talking camera bullshit that ruins all the fun...
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:02 pm
by Plan B
Please correct me if I'm wrong, haven't really closely followed the new consoles, but what I *do* keep hearing is that
xboxone renders quite a few games at 720p where ps4 renders them at 1080p?
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:31 pm
by Plan B
Comment makes more sense if you mean when xbone does 1080?
Re: Titanfall
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:41 pm
by MKJ
Xbone renders at 900 I think, but at 60fps. Ps4 does 1080 at 30