Page 3 of 3

Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 12:15 pm
by Timbo
netrex wrote:
Timbo wrote:ETQW is developed by SplashDamage, not id.
Kinda under id's direction according to Hollenshead :)
TBH, Toddh talks a lot of crap.

Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 12:30 pm
by Timbo
I should probably expand on that. Basically I strongly suspect the arrangement is that SD's game designer decides how the game is going to be and SD develops it. If id are unhappy with what they've done, they will get involved -- it is their IP after all. This is really a fairly tenuous definition of "under direction", at least in the games industry (and yes, I have worked in the industry, and no, not in "Game").

In any case, SD are the developers of ETQW, not id. Which is what I originally said :icon23:.

Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 1:41 pm
by o'dium
Who cares :p The fact still remains, the ET:QW strogg own hard :p

Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 2:47 pm
by digibob
o'dium wrote:Who cares :p The fact still remains, the ET:QW strogg own hard :p
Us? ;)

Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 4:00 pm
by Fjoggs
Invasion!