Quake3World

I'm not talking about Al-assad or his father , I'm talking about when the parliament was merged into 1 party in the 50s

Hitler is a bit of a tricky subject but he was given power through a democratic process via Hindenburg

losCHUNK wrote:Well... Hitler ?

Yeah he won... He was the legit leader of Germany... That's how it works...

The sinister version of Nick Clegg

Talk about tricky, I just started watching Oliver Stone's Untold History of the United States, so I have a newfound respect for the complexities of WWII.

Racism in america = total Japanese destruction...

Transient wrote:Talk about tricky, I just started watching Oliver Stone's Untold History of the United States, so I have a newfound respect for the complexities of WWII.

I enjoyed that series.

Ah, been meaning to watch that but i keep forgetting...

everybody know there are no such tings as consiresys ey come on everything ligit!

Transient wrote:Talk about tricky, I just started watching Oliver Stone's Untold History of the United States, so I have a newfound respect for the complexities of WWII.

I liked it

White knights America in some bits but I'm gonna give it a rewatch

Memphis wrote:'Tis rather good. If a little preachy at times.

Aye, he can get like that

losCHUNK wrote:The sinister version of Nick Clegg

nope.jpg

scared? wrote:Racism in america = total Japanese destruction...

doublenope.jpg

Fascist

seremtan wrote:love how people are still talking about the 'revolution' in Ukraine like it was overthrowing a dictatorship. Yanukovych was democratically elected, fuck-knuckles; you overthrew the guy you elected, thereby instantly voiding your membership of the democracy club - like those bell-ends in Egypt

Being elected doesn't mean you can't be/become a dictator. See: Hitler, Caesar, etc.

YourGrandpa wrote:Thoughts?

Qui bono?

Russia - They get the Krim.

USA - They forced the Russians to react - they would have lost their military bases AND would have had a pro euro country with a direct border to russia. This again forced the EU to react - the EU can not be fine with the annexion of the Krim. In the end this drives a wedge between the EU and Russia. This is good for the US.

My guess is that the regime change in the ukraine was pushed by the US (smart) and also by the EU (not so smart.)

Wasn't their military base lease due to expire soon anyway ?

Source - Kracus

Deji wrote:

seremtan wrote:love how people are still talking about the 'revolution' in Ukraine like it was overthrowing a dictatorship. Yanukovych was democratically elected, fuck-knuckles; you overthrew the guy you elected, thereby instantly voiding your membership of the democracy club - like those bell-ends in Egypt

Being elected doesn't mean you can't be/become a dictator. See: Hitler, Caesar, etc.

and just because some elected people become dictators doesn't mean all elected people become dictators. see: most elected leaders, etc

But they void the democracy club membership only when the dictator is overthrown ?

Well, the votes are in and it looks like Crimea wanted this. What's the problem?

There wasn't a no option apparently

What sanctions do you think are coming?

no marlboro and jeans for you!

Time for the yanks to deploy terrorists to Crimea.

xer0s wrote:Well, the votes are in and it looks like Crimea wanted this. What's the problem?

The votes were rigged, for starters. Although Crimea would've voted for it anyway, which is funny.

Whenever a vote doesn't go the way the US neo-cons planned, it's rigged

What a pathetic shithole of a third world nation the yanks have. All Putin has to say is "come at me bros" and they all shit their pants. Good on Russia for claiming what was rightfully theirs

By rigged, I mean there are areas of Crimea that had 123% turnout.