worth upgrading? amd 1.8ghz right now

Locked
hood-ire
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:04 am

worth upgrading? amd 1.8ghz right now

Post by hood-ire »

hey was just wondering

i got an nvidia fx 5500

and an AMD xp 1.8 ghz .. 1gb ram

i tweaked the crap outta my CFG so far and am still getting only 25-30 fps..

was just looking for opinions on a mobo/chip upgrade

i heard alotta people talking about amd 3.1 GHz with same/equal video card as i have and pulling pretty good FPS..

u think it's worth it to upgrade to a 3.0 ghz or so.. or should i just wait untill the patch the shit outta this game?
MidnightQ4
Posts: 520
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:59 pm

Post by MidnightQ4 »

if you want to play then upgrade
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

Yes, your processor is limiting you. You'd probably get decent framerates with that card (at low res and low detail) if you got a A64 3000+ or better.
Oeloe
Posts: 1529
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:00 am

Post by Oeloe »

The FX5500 (and FX5600 or any GF4) just doesn't cut it. You must have a really low detail cfg because i'm surprised you get 25-30 fps with that card. Upgrading cpu+mobo will stabilize the FPS (which is what you want) but it will not boost it much with an FX5500. I think you need at least something that's faster than the fastest GF4. Your vidcard is limiting you much more than your cpu is. Get a GF 6600 (GT) or Radeon X700 or something like that.
Last edited by Oeloe on Thu Oct 20, 2005 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Q4 is more CPU-intensive than GPU-intensive. I'd upgrade to an Athlon64.
You'll still need to upgrade the vid card eventually, but I think the CPU would be the best place to start, to get the most bang for your buck.
gatorboy
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 6:56 pm

Post by gatorboy »

The 6600GT is a good, cheap card to get if you have the funds. At just above $150 bucks, it's well worth it if you can't afford better at the moment.
Locked