New ET:QW In-game trailer released
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 12:10 pm
Dunno about other mirrors ill keep looking guys:
http://media.pc.gamespy.com/media/748/7 ... ids_1.html
http://media.pc.gamespy.com/media/748/7 ... ids_1.html
Quake3World
Your world is waiting...
https://www.quake3world.com/forum/
New ET:QW In-game trailer released
Page 1 of 3
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 12:42 pm
That's looking pretty cool.
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 12:55 pm
Has anyone heard even preliminary h/w specs for this game? It looks fantastic, but if I have to get an SGI cluster just to play it, well...
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 12:56 pm
Same spec as Doom 3, lower than Quake 4.Nightshade wrote:Has anyone heard even preliminary h/w specs for this game? It looks fantastic, but if I have to get an SGI cluster just to play it, well...
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 12:59 pm
Ohh so they actually optimized..o'dium wrote:Same spec as Doom 3, lower than Quake 4.Nightshade wrote:Has anyone heard even preliminary h/w specs for this game? It looks fantastic, but if I have to get an SGI cluster just to play it, well...
Fucking doom
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 1:01 pm
I'll say RAM is more of a key factor for these kind of games than others. As O'dium said, same spec as doom 3, lower than quake 4 but I will personaly estimate 2GB of ram to play it high specs comfortably.
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 1:19 pm
if the demo confirms that this game is as good as i think it'll be, i'll buy a new machine for it. fuck it - if it's that good, i'll buy two.
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 2:09 pm
lol, look at the motion capture fag.
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 2:35 pm
You must be shitting me.o'dium wrote:Same spec as Doom 3, lower than Quake 4.Nightshade wrote:Has anyone heard even preliminary h/w specs for this game? It looks fantastic, but if I have to get an SGI cluster just to play it, well...
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 2:39 pm
No. They have a complete optimization of the shadowing programs, plus its rendering a lot less making it less cpu bound. Also, they have implemented LOD again on various objects and models, making it less CPU bound still.Nightshade wrote:You must be shitting me.o'dium wrote:Same spec as Doom 3, lower than Quake 4.Nightshade wrote:Has anyone heard even preliminary h/w specs for this game? It looks fantastic, but if I have to get an SGI cluster just to play it, well...
Like was mentioned, it will probably run best with ram and a decent GPU with ram (256 GPU+), but its really not as CPU bound as Doom 3 was thanks to a lot of new trickery in the engine. OverDose uses the same ideas which is why we can push 64,000 polygons for terrain alone in a single scene with hardly any frame rate drop.
EDIT: Changed test so i sound more Engrich.
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 2:43 pm
Sweet. I'm a bit CPU limited at the moment, (XP2500+), but I've got 2Gb of PC2700 and a 6800GT. Sounds like I'm ready to roll.
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:34 pm
In which interview does it say that?o'dium wrote:Same spec as Doom 3, lower than Quake 4.Nightshade wrote:Has anyone heard even preliminary h/w specs for this game? It looks fantastic, but if I have to get an SGI cluster just to play it, well...
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:35 pm
Every interview ever done about system specs, plus the devs talk all the time on the forums.Zombie13 wrote:In which interview does it say that?o'dium wrote:Same spec as Doom 3, lower than Quake 4.Nightshade wrote:Has anyone heard even preliminary h/w specs for this game? It looks fantastic, but if I have to get an SGI cluster just to play it, well...
Anyways, 2 new pics:
[lvlshot]http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/8136/sdd9xl.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/9008/ghosttownshot015yw.jpg[/lvlshot]
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:39 pm
None of the dev's have mentioned these facts. Stop talking shit for 5mins please.o'dium wrote:Every interview ever done about system specs, plus the devs talk all the time on the forums.Zombie13 wrote:In which interview does it say that?o'dium wrote: Same spec as Doom 3, lower than Quake 4.
Anyways, 2 new pics:
[lvlshot]http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/8136/sdd9xl.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/9008/ghosttownshot015yw.jpg[/lvlshot]
Z
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:41 pm
Man this game is looking wicked cool I What are the PC specs recommended?
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:44 pm
Excuse me?Zombie13 wrote:None of the dev's have mentioned these facts. Stop talking shit for 5mins please.o'dium wrote:Every interview ever done about system specs, plus the devs talk all the time on the forums.Zombie13 wrote: In which interview does it say that?
Anyways, 2 new pics:
[lvlshot]http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/8136/sdd9xl.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/9008 ... t015yw.jpg[/lvlshot]
Z
http://www.splashdamage.com/modules.php ... file=index
Do some fucking reading.
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:49 pm
The facts are if you can RUN Doom 3 with a decent frame rate, then you are able to RUN ETQW, there is nothing that says what you have said which is that it runs faster than Quake 4. And thanks for the link I read it all day at work.... sometimes we need a break from making ETQW 
Z
Z
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:51 pm
ownedPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:54 pm
Holy fucking smackdown, Batman!
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:55 pm
Odium = 1
Zombie13 = -2
Zombie13 = -2
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:58 pm
How do you figure that?
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:04 pm
lol, odium you fucking muppet
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:06 pm
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:14 pm
olo
looks fucking fantastic btw
looks fucking fantastic btw
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:22 pm
*shrugNightshade wrote:How do you figure that?
i dunno, i like odium better
