Okay, WTF is going on with this new card I got ? (6600GT)

mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Okay, WTF is going on with this new card I got ? (6600GT)

Post by mjrpes »

Previous card: ATI Radeon 9600 128MB (vanilla 9600, isn't the faster Pro or XT)
New Card: nVidia GeForce 6600GT 128MB (using 66.93 Drivers)


Benchmark: Quake 3 Demo (1024x768, High Detail, 32bit, no AA)
ATI 9600 Results:

demo 001: 168.3
demo 002: 173.7
GeForce 6600GT Results:

demo 001: 130.2
demo 002: 117.8
WTF could I be doing wrong? I played some quake3 maps on both (not the demo, the latest release) and the 9600 is definitely much faster. But the 6600GT should be much much faster than the 9600. I tried newer drivers, but besides locking up my system, they didn't make a difference. Google isn't helping me either.
4g3nt_Smith
Posts: 711
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:00 am

Post by 4g3nt_Smith »

Is this the same install of XP? If so, thats your first problem; going from one brand to the other on the same install generally results into a shitty experience.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

4g3nt_Smith wrote:Is this the same install of XP? If so, thats your first problem; going from one brand to the other on the same install generally results into a shitty experience.
wtf

so basically, most reviewers who bench, say, three different vid cars on the same system/install, are giving us bogus numbers and we should ignore said reviews?
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by U4EA »

I believe they do fresh installs for significant hardware changes while benchmarking.
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

If you don't wanna format I'd suggest giving these 2 proggies a try:

http://www.driverheaven.net/cleaner/ (Remove all the ATI/Nvidia components)

http://www.macecraft.com/jv16powertools2005/ (Remove ATI/Nvidia reg. entries with this)

Then have a go at installing the Nvidia drivers once again for your new card.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

Huh, I've never heard it mentioned to reinstall windows for a video card upgrade.... I would think card manufacturers would put a big notice in huge font about this if performance were to degrade so much by going to a new card on the same install of windows.

I do have an extra hard drive lying around, so I could install windows on it to check performance out.

EDIT: thx, I'll try those links out first.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

Driver Cleaning software didn't help. Still fustratingly slow. What's weird is that the 71.84 drivers cause lots of artifacts to show in quake and causes the syste to freeze up within half a minute. I wonder if I could have a defective card.
Tormentius
Posts: 4108
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Tormentius »

mjrpes wrote:Huh, I've never heard it mentioned to reinstall windows for a video card upgrade.... I would think card manufacturers would put a big notice in huge font about this if performance were to degrade so much by going to a new card on the same install of windows.
When switching brands (eg ATI to Nvidia) its always better to reinstall.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

I will reinstall tomorrow and hope for the best :)

If it fixes the problem then everyone in this thread gets a beer on me :) :)
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Tormentius wrote:
mjrpes wrote:Huh, I've never heard it mentioned to reinstall windows for a video card upgrade.... I would think card manufacturers would put a big notice in huge font about this if performance were to degrade so much by going to a new card on the same install of windows.
When switching brands (eg ATI to Nvidia) its always better to reinstall.
hm, maybe i've just not ever seen it mentioned in reviews or they don't say. interbreasting.

carry on.
Magestic
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Magestic »

mjrpes wrote:Driver Cleaning software didn't help. Still fustratingly slow. What's weird is that the 71.84 drivers cause lots of artifacts to show in quake and causes the syste to freeze up within half a minute. I wonder if I could have a defective card.
I would return it right now. That shit ain't right.
SOAPboy
Posts: 8268
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:00 am

Post by SOAPboy »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
4g3nt_Smith wrote:Is this the same install of XP? If so, thats your first problem; going from one brand to the other on the same install generally results into a shitty experience.
wtf

so basically, most reviewers who bench, say, three different vid cars on the same system/install, are giving us bogus numbers and we should ignore said reviews?
They do FRESH FORMATS on each card.. and keep OLD DATA from old benchmarks.. remember, they generally keep the test bed the same.. and if they do, guess what, fresh format..

Reason being.. No matter HOW CLEAN you get your drivers, it wont run as good as a fresh install..

it also helps that most people who do reviews, make a nice HD backup for quick formatting.

BTW what motherboard.. i had this SAME SHIT happen with my 6800gt..
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

if you actually backtrek a little when they where first noticing the issues with ATI VS Nvidia Driver issues, they did note that they use Norton Ghost to Make a "Fresh" install of xp on the drive, they apply the drivers and install the app's and Give'er.

btw, toms, and anandtech both said this.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Okay, WTF is going on with this new card I got ? (6600GT

Post by mjrpes »

Just to recap:
GeForce 6600GT Results - Old Install:

demo 001: 130.2
demo 002: 117.8
and these are the results with the card running off a new install of XP:
GeForce 6600GT Results - New Install:

demo 001: 255.4
demo 002: 251.9
That's more like it!!

Free beer for everyone!!!

I think ATI must have installed some super evil hidden software that prevents nVidia cards from reaching their potential :D

Thanks for your help everyone :)
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Glad to hear its workin man.. GG
Kills On Site
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Kills On Site »

Well switching either side sucks for performance. Like everyone said, chanigng grahpics card companies is always better for a fresh install.

BTW Juggernaut, yea that mustve been embarassing.

Now when I ditched my 9800 Pro and got the 6800GT I didn't see horid performance, the reason I didnt do a fresh install is because I was waiting for the Raptor, but I have seen performance drop dramatically from ATI to nVIDIA and nVIDIA to ATI, here is a great example.
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

ohhh, btw.. gimmie the 9600 :)
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Kills On Site wrote:BTW Juggernaut, yea that mustve been embarassing.

wut?
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

AmIdYfReAk wrote:ohhh, btw.. gimmie the 9600 :)
It's a very decent card.... good performance and fanless. The reason I got the 6600GT is because Gigabyte came out with a fanless version of it.

I hate noise :)
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

Oh, another thing. On this reinstall of windows I used the latest nVidia drivers (71.84). On my older install I couldn't even use these because artifacts would show up and quake would freeze within half a minute (as I mentioned above).

Something was really fucked up with my system.
[size=85]yea i've too been kind of thinking about maybe a new sig but sort of haven't come to quite a decision yet[/size]
Kills On Site
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Kills On Site »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
Kills On Site wrote:BTW Juggernaut, yea that mustve been embarassing.

wut?
Saying that all the reviews and shit were bogus
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

i was pointing out that they seemed to be bogus since i've never seen anything stating that they reinstall XP for different manufacturers when then test vidcards. i've just not seen or heard of that before.

hardly embarassing you twit.
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
hm, maybe i've just not ever seen it mentioned in reviews or they don't say. interbreasting.

carry on.
which is why i stated the above, dumb dumb.
Kills On Site
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Kills On Site »

Hence my yea, I was agreeing with you
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

I've never seen it mentioned in review sites. And neither have I seen it mentioned, or even recommended, in manuals that come with video cards. that led me to believe not having a clean install of windows wasn't the problem.

But now I see I was wrong :)
[size=85]yea i've too been kind of thinking about maybe a new sig but sort of haven't come to quite a decision yet[/size]
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

Probably something the card manufacturers dont want you to know.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
Locked