Not trying to spark a new WTC debate

Post by **Nightshade** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:32 pm

Just want to put this link out there for those that may not know about it.
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

It's very interesting to me that they address every single conspiracy theory that's been voiced, demolition, the 'free-fall' bit, molten metal, etc., etc.

Post by **bitWISE** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:40 pm

Clearly, NIST was in on it. That is exactly the kind of web page they would make if they were trying to shift the blame away from themselves.

Post by **R00k** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:44 pm

This is the best debunking I've seen yet.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net ... 911_morons

Post by **Geebs** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:51 pm

lol, told

Post by **Nightshade** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:55 pm

R00k wrote:This is the best debunking I've seen yet.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net ... 911_morons

Oddly enough, that's precisely where I found the link.

Post by **Nightshade** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:56 pm

bitWISE wrote:Clearly, NIST was in on it. That is exactly the kind of web page they would make if they were trying to shift the blame away from themselves.

That's exactly what you'd say if you knew there was no conspiracy but you wanted to keep stirring shit, Kyle.

Post by ***NoSleep*** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:16 pm

I forgot all about Maddox's debunk. Must bookmark that for future reference.

Post by **MaCaBr3** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:22 pm

Nightshade wrote:
bitWISE wrote:Clearly, NIST was in on it. That is exactly the kind of web page they would make if they were trying to shift the blame away from themselves.
That's exactly what you'd say if you knew there was no conspiracy but you wanted to keep stirring shit, Kyle.

You guys stop it, this isn't getting us anywere.

Post by **seremtan** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:34 pm

dylan avery may be full of shit, but nafeez ahmed definitely isn't. read 'the war on truth' - he does for 9/11 what paul foot did for lockerbie, seriously investigative work without the tinfoil and kool aid

Post by **Nightshade** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:24 pm

Did you read the link? I tend to believe large numbers of highly experienced professionals over internet kooks.
Not that I'm trying to make a comparison to Ahmed, I still want to read that book.

Post by **R00k** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:32 pm

Nightshade wrote:
R00k wrote:This is the best debunking I've seen yet.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net ... 911_morons
Oddly enough, that's precisely where I found the link.

Post by **seremtan** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:47 pm

Nightshade wrote:Did you read the link? I tend to believe large numbers of highly experienced professionals over internet kooks.
Not that I'm trying to make a comparison to Ahmed, I still want to read that book.

yes, i read the link

ahmed's thesis has nothing to do with thermite and missiles or inside job shenanigans. i think i've said this already, but his conclusion is that 19 guys from al-qa'eda did 9/11, and succeeded because various obstacles were removed from their path on way

Post by **scared?** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:34 pm

either way it was an inside job...revolution?

Post by **Cory** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:54 pm

kill yourself?

Post by **seremtan** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:11 am

scared? wrote:either way it was an inside job...revolution?

rubbish

Post by **mik0rs** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:50 am

Clearly it was Elvis from the grassy knoll.

Post by **seremtan** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:31 am

rubbish

Post by ek » Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:33 am

R00k wrote:This is the best debunking I've seen yet.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net ... 911_morons

haha yep