Page 1 of 1
Not trying to spark a new WTC debate
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:32 pm
by Nightshade
Just want to put this link out there for those that may not know about it.
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
It's very interesting to me that they address every single conspiracy theory that's been voiced, demolition, the 'free-fall' bit, molten metal, etc., etc.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:40 pm
by bitWISE
Clearly, NIST was in on it. That is exactly the kind of web page they would make if they were trying to shift the blame away from themselves.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:44 pm
by R00k
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:51 pm
by Geebs
lol, told
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:55 pm
by Nightshade
Oddly enough, that's precisely where I found the link.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:56 pm
by Nightshade
bitWISE wrote:Clearly, NIST was in on it. That is exactly the kind of web page they would make if they were trying to shift the blame away from themselves.
That's exactly what you'd say if you knew there was no conspiracy but you wanted to keep stirring shit, Kyle.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:16 pm
by *NoSleep*
I forgot all about Maddox's debunk. Must bookmark that for future reference.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:22 pm
by MaCaBr3
Nightshade wrote:bitWISE wrote:Clearly, NIST was in on it. That is exactly the kind of web page they would make if they were trying to shift the blame away from themselves.
That's exactly what you'd say if you knew there was no conspiracy but you wanted to keep stirring shit, Kyle.
You guys stop it, this isn't getting us anywere.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:34 pm
by seremtan
dylan avery may be full of shit, but nafeez ahmed definitely isn't. read 'the war on truth' - he does for 9/11 what paul foot did for lockerbie, seriously investigative work without the tinfoil and kool aid
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:24 pm
by Nightshade
Did you read the link? I tend to believe large numbers of highly experienced professionals over internet kooks.
Not that I'm trying to make a comparison to Ahmed, I still want to read that book.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:32 pm
by R00k
Nightshade wrote:
Oddly enough, that's precisely where I found the link.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:47 pm
by seremtan
Nightshade wrote:Did you read the link? I tend to believe large numbers of highly experienced professionals over internet kooks.
Not that I'm trying to make a comparison to Ahmed, I still want to read that book.
yes, i read the link
ahmed's thesis has nothing to do with thermite and missiles or inside job shenanigans. i think i've said this already, but his conclusion is that 19 guys from al-qa'eda did 9/11, and succeeded because various obstacles were removed from their path on way
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:34 pm
by scared?
either way it was an inside job...revolution?
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:54 pm
by Cory
kill yourself?
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:11 am
by seremtan
scared? wrote:either way it was an inside job...revolution?
rubbish
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:50 am
by mik0rs
Clearly it was Elvis from the grassy knoll.
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:31 am
by seremtan
rubbish
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:33 am
by ek