LawL might not be able to see this soon

Big Kahuna Burger
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm

LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Big Kahuna Burger »

http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/30/au ... -internet/
Australia Joins China In Censoring The Internet

The Australian Government has announced that they will be joining China as one of the few countries globally that broadly censor the internet.

The Labor Party’s policy was announced prior to the Australian Election in November (release here) and was justified on the basis that the previous Government’s policy of providing free copies of NetNanny to all Australian households who wanted it didn’t adequately protect children.

As recently as the week prior to the election, Labor Party candidates were telling those concerned about the proposed law that the censorship wouldn’t be compulsory, and that the “clean feed” would be opt-in, not opt-out. Today’s announcement by Telecommunications Minister Stephen Conroy states that the censorship regime will be mandatory, although people will be able to opt-out of it. The problem of course then becomes if you opt-out questions will be asked as to why you want out, which in itself may lead to Government monitoring.

To be censored by the Australian Government is “pornography and inappropriate material.” X rated pornography is illegal online in Australia, as are casino style internet gambling, certain forms of “hate” speech and R rated computer games. BitTorrent would be a possibility, even if certain downloads for personal use may be legal under Australian law, sharing those downloads would not be. How far “inappropriate material” may extend was not made clear, for example questioning Government policy where it comes to Aboriginal people could be deemed to be discrimination under Australian law and hence blocked by the censorship regime. Worst still, bloggers or those (such as forum owners) who allow users to comment or post could find themselves blocked under this proposal should someone say or post the wrong thing. If there is one certainty in any country that implements broadscale censorship, once they start blocking content it doesn’t stop, and certainly every do-gooder group and special interest lobbyist will be wanting the Government to add to the list.

There is also a potential cost involved to Australian Internet users. The previous Government regularly cited feedback from ISP’s stating that the cost of implementing a “clean feed” would be passed onto internet users, who already pay some of the highest internet access costs in the Western world for on average slow services.

Notably Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd was a former Australian Diplomat in China, and speaks fluent Mandarin; given Australia’s boom is fueled by mineral exports to China, it would seem that Australian Government policies are now by China in return. This video from before the election may have foretold some of the future.
:olo:
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by R00k »

ouch.

and porn and "R-rated" computer games are already illegal in Australia? wtf, i thought we were bad here.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by seremtan »

lol, australia
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Captain »

Australia :olo:
LawL
Posts: 18358
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:49 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by LawL »

Oh no :olo:
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Tsakali_
Posts: 3778
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:46 pm

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Tsakali_ »

Image
Dark Metal
Posts: 5496
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2000 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Dark Metal »

That was funny. I laughed.
[WYD]
nay0k
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 4:13 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by nay0k »

LawL wrote:Oh no :olo:
Raped :olo:
LawL
Posts: 18358
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:49 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by LawL »

gayc0k'd :olo:
nay0k
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 4:13 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by nay0k »

FaiL'd :olo:
busetibi
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by busetibi »

could be worse.....

" Iran is highly successful in filtering pornographic sites (100% of URLs tested) and circumvention tools such as anonymizers117 (95% of URLs), "
Gaza's Shirt:
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by feedback »

I think we better invade Australia
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Doombrain »

:olo: :olo: :olo:
Yeando
Posts: 598
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2002 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Yeando »

So it will be more like 2girls1melbournecup?
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by R00k »

busetibi wrote:could be worse.....

" Iran is highly successful in filtering pornographic sites (100% of URLs tested) and circumvention tools such as anonymizers117 (95% of URLs), "
your country looks free and open in comparison to iran. :olo:
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Captain »

You know nothing about Iran :olo:
LawL
Posts: 18358
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:49 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by LawL »

Either do you. :olo:
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Captain »

Having actually been there, I do :olo:

PS. It's 'neither', you dumb mongoloid :olo:
Canidae
Posts: 2351
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:29 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Canidae »

Does this mean LawL will be banned from being on the internet? Image

If so, he will be graduating Law school soon so I'm sure he'll file an injunction.
[img]http://www.subliminaldissonance.com/popehat.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.subliminaldissonance.com/images/smilies/nothing.jpg[/img]
busetibi
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by busetibi »

R00k wrote:
busetibi wrote:could be worse.....

" Iran is highly successful in filtering pornographic sites (100% of URLs tested) and circumvention tools such as anonymizers117 (95% of URLs), "
your country looks free and open in comparison to iran. :olo:
I currently reside in Australia, but I wouldn't call it "my" country, but i know what you're getting at ;)
Gaza's Shirt:
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by seremtan »

...feedback from ISP’s stating that the cost of implementing a “clean feed” would be passed onto internet users, who already pay some of the highest internet access costs in the Western world for on average slow services.
so it's basically a scam. this is what you get with a PM called kevin
busetibi
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by busetibi »

Captain Mazda wrote:You know nothing about Iran :olo:
well i know that your parents think so highly of iran that they prefer to live and bring up their misbegotten children in Canada,
speaks fucking volumes, no? :olo:
Gaza's Shirt:
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Doombrain »

Captain Mazda wrote:Having actually been there, I do :olo:

PS. It's 'neither', you dumb mongoloid :olo:
fucking crushed :olo:
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by Captain »

I don't think "escaping war" is a matter of preference, you ignorant piece of shit :olo:
And if we'd been brought up in Canada instead of Finland, we'd probably be fat and uneducated :olo:

Do you insist on being a dumbfuck sorely because of your sticky fetish with being wrong all the time? :olo:
busetibi
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Post by busetibi »

tell you truth for once you lying piece of camel faeces, the iran/ iraq war ended ages ago, so why dont they go back to the land of milk and honey?
so you're saying that Canadians are fat and uneducated, I'll bet they would be happy to know thats what you think of the people who let you and your ilk restart your lives.

:olo:
Gaza's Shirt:
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
Locked