Page 1 of 3

LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:15 pm
by Big Kahuna Burger
http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/30/au ... -internet/
Australia Joins China In Censoring The Internet

The Australian Government has announced that they will be joining China as one of the few countries globally that broadly censor the internet.

The Labor Party’s policy was announced prior to the Australian Election in November (release here) and was justified on the basis that the previous Government’s policy of providing free copies of NetNanny to all Australian households who wanted it didn’t adequately protect children.

As recently as the week prior to the election, Labor Party candidates were telling those concerned about the proposed law that the censorship wouldn’t be compulsory, and that the “clean feed” would be opt-in, not opt-out. Today’s announcement by Telecommunications Minister Stephen Conroy states that the censorship regime will be mandatory, although people will be able to opt-out of it. The problem of course then becomes if you opt-out questions will be asked as to why you want out, which in itself may lead to Government monitoring.

To be censored by the Australian Government is “pornography and inappropriate material.” X rated pornography is illegal online in Australia, as are casino style internet gambling, certain forms of “hate” speech and R rated computer games. BitTorrent would be a possibility, even if certain downloads for personal use may be legal under Australian law, sharing those downloads would not be. How far “inappropriate material” may extend was not made clear, for example questioning Government policy where it comes to Aboriginal people could be deemed to be discrimination under Australian law and hence blocked by the censorship regime. Worst still, bloggers or those (such as forum owners) who allow users to comment or post could find themselves blocked under this proposal should someone say or post the wrong thing. If there is one certainty in any country that implements broadscale censorship, once they start blocking content it doesn’t stop, and certainly every do-gooder group and special interest lobbyist will be wanting the Government to add to the list.

There is also a potential cost involved to Australian Internet users. The previous Government regularly cited feedback from ISP’s stating that the cost of implementing a “clean feed” would be passed onto internet users, who already pay some of the highest internet access costs in the Western world for on average slow services.

Notably Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd was a former Australian Diplomat in China, and speaks fluent Mandarin; given Australia’s boom is fueled by mineral exports to China, it would seem that Australian Government policies are now by China in return. This video from before the election may have foretold some of the future.
:olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:21 pm
by R00k
ouch.

and porn and "R-rated" computer games are already illegal in Australia? wtf, i thought we were bad here.

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:27 pm
by seremtan
lol, australia

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:46 pm
by Captain
Australia :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 9:06 pm
by LawL
Oh no :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 9:30 pm
by Tsakali_
Image

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:20 pm
by Dark Metal
That was funny. I laughed.

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:21 pm
by nay0k
LawL wrote:Oh no :olo:
Raped :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:32 pm
by LawL
gayc0k'd :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:44 am
by nay0k
FaiL'd :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 2:33 am
by busetibi
could be worse.....

" Iran is highly successful in filtering pornographic sites (100% of URLs tested) and circumvention tools such as anonymizers117 (95% of URLs), "

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:34 am
by feedback
I think we better invade Australia

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:55 pm
by Doombrain
:olo: :olo: :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:18 pm
by Yeando
So it will be more like 2girls1melbournecup?

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:14 pm
by R00k
busetibi wrote:could be worse.....

" Iran is highly successful in filtering pornographic sites (100% of URLs tested) and circumvention tools such as anonymizers117 (95% of URLs), "
your country looks free and open in comparison to iran. :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:24 pm
by Captain
You know nothing about Iran :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:46 am
by LawL
Either do you. :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:55 am
by Captain
Having actually been there, I do :olo:

PS. It's 'neither', you dumb mongoloid :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:06 am
by Canidae
Does this mean LawL will be banned from being on the internet? Image

If so, he will be graduating Law school soon so I'm sure he'll file an injunction.

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:45 am
by busetibi
R00k wrote:
busetibi wrote:could be worse.....

" Iran is highly successful in filtering pornographic sites (100% of URLs tested) and circumvention tools such as anonymizers117 (95% of URLs), "
your country looks free and open in comparison to iran. :olo:
I currently reside in Australia, but I wouldn't call it "my" country, but i know what you're getting at ;)

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:46 am
by seremtan
...feedback from ISP’s stating that the cost of implementing a “clean feed” would be passed onto internet users, who already pay some of the highest internet access costs in the Western world for on average slow services.
so it's basically a scam. this is what you get with a PM called kevin

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:56 am
by busetibi
Captain Mazda wrote:You know nothing about Iran :olo:
well i know that your parents think so highly of iran that they prefer to live and bring up their misbegotten children in Canada,
speaks fucking volumes, no? :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:50 am
by Doombrain
Captain Mazda wrote:Having actually been there, I do :olo:

PS. It's 'neither', you dumb mongoloid :olo:
fucking crushed :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:52 am
by Captain
I don't think "escaping war" is a matter of preference, you ignorant piece of shit :olo:
And if we'd been brought up in Canada instead of Finland, we'd probably be fat and uneducated :olo:

Do you insist on being a dumbfuck sorely because of your sticky fetish with being wrong all the time? :olo:

Re: LawL might not be able to see this soon

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:19 am
by busetibi
tell you truth for once you lying piece of camel faeces, the iran/ iraq war ended ages ago, so why dont they go back to the land of milk and honey?
so you're saying that Canadians are fat and uneducated, I'll bet they would be happy to know thats what you think of the people who let you and your ilk restart your lives.

:olo: