
Irish slight.
Get bent, monkey boy.Massive Quasars wrote:Irish slight.
Exactly.werldhed wrote:at people thinking the monkey represents Obama.
The cartoon spoofs the story about that chimp that went crazy yesterday and was shot. The joke being that even a monkey could come up with the stimulus legislation.
Are you serious? Quite apart from the fact that the stimulus package is probably the biggest issue on American's minds right now...Chupacabra wrote:how many people are aware of the stimulus package? how many people are aware of that crazy chimp story?
at people who think its
at people thinking the monkey represents obama.
how many people read the NY post and will see both articles? how many people will see this comic? i, for one, dont keep up with the NY post and have seen the comic. i'm sure that there are many, many like me. probably millions on the internet will see the comic alone.werldhed wrote:Are you serious? Quite apart from the fact that the stimulus package is probably the biggest issue on American's minds right now...Chupacabra wrote:how many people are aware of the stimulus package? how many people are aware of that crazy chimp story?
at people who think its
at people thinking the monkey represents obama.
That cartoon is from the NY Post.
Here's the front page of nypost.com:
image
If you wait 5 seconds, you get this:
image
If you see that cartoon and don't know about those two things, you deserve a
Al Sharpton wrote:The cartoon in today's New York Post is troubling at best given the historic racist attacks of African-Americans as being synonymous with monkeys. One has to question whether the cartoonist is making a less than casual reference to this when in the cartoon they have police saying after shooting a chimpanzee that "Now they will have to find someone else to write the stimulus bill."
No maybes, it was full stop retarded. But it is really the editor who fucked this up...placing the monkey cartoon immediately after the large photo layout of Obama signing the stimulus bill. I mean, the cartoon may or may not be objectionable on its face...I can see reasonable arguments on both sides, given the currency of the crazed chimp story. However, in the context of where it appears in the paper itself the manifest lack of editorial judgment is mind boggling.tnf wrote:Maybe poor judgment to not think about the shitstorm this would create..
obama cant be portrayed a monkey as a mark of his intellect becuase he's incredibly intelligent. so of course its about race. and of course that's going ot be offensive to many people. is that a surprise?Shmee wrote:So we can portray Bush as a monkey for 8 years as a mark of his "intellect" but not Obama because he's black and it might be construed as a racial slur?
Bullshit. Goddamn PC babies.