Page 1 of 1

Instagram

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:25 pm
by xer0s
Are you following anyone interesting? I'm following umetaturou, but I can only look at this dog put things on its head for so long. Who's into this?

Re: Instagram

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:43 pm
by mrd
DIAF

Re: Instagram

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:16 am
by GONNAFISTYA
mrd wrote:DIAF
:up:

Re: Instagram

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:18 am
by Big Kahuna Burger
mostly hot hipsters from BK that i'm trying to put my thing in

Re: Instagram

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:33 am
by xer0s
mrd wrote:DIAF
That's not very nice...

Re: Instagram

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:08 am
by mrd
Big Kahuna Burger wrote:mostly hot hipsters from BK that i'm trying to put my thing in
Burger King? :ducky:

Re: Instagram

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:11 am
by xer0s
Yeah, Burger King hipsters...

Image

Re: Instagram

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:44 am
by MKJ
lol fuck off with your instagram

Re: Instagram

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:14 am
by Eraser
you mean facebook

Re: Instagram

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:27 am
by TruthfulLiar
you mean morons.

Re: Instagram

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:38 am
by seremtan
fagsbook, twatter and instagay fuck off :arrow:

Re: Instagram

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:37 am
by Don Carlos
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20767537
Facebook's photo-sharing site Instagram has updated its privacy policy giving it the right to sell users' photos to advertisers without notification.

Unless users delete their Instagram accounts by a deadline of 16 January, they cannot opt out.

The changes also mean Instagram can share information about its users with Facebook, its parent company, as well as other affiliates and advertisers.
Oh dear...

Re: Instagram

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:55 pm
by phantasmagoria
I'm not an instagram user, I'm actually very uninterested in photographs of food and people's children smeared with a false sense of nostalgia but it's quite a big and smart move for Zuckerberg, basically they're moving into the stock photo market and they'll have access to a continually updated archive of tagged and organised stock images by a clients that don't even need paying. I wonder if they'll give people shares in images that are used often, like YouTube and their monetary rewards from advertising in order to encourage people to keep using the app, in fact it might entice more people to use it.

I like the Reginald Braithwaite quote:
You are not our customers, you are the cattle we drive to market and auction off to the highest bidder. Enjoy your feed and keep producing the milk.

Re: Instagram

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 2:27 pm
by bitWISE
phantasmagoria wrote:I'm not an instagram user, I'm actually very uninterested in photographs of food and people's children smeared with a false sense of nostalgia
this

Re: Instagram

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 2:35 pm
by xer0s
Well, I'm not sure if you guys have never used it or don't understand, but you're not forced to look at the "food and children" photos. There are some legitimate photographers, people that live in interesting places, and people that have the same interests as you that have great photos. You can follow these people and you don't even have to bother with the rest of the "hipsters"...

Re: Instagram

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 2:51 pm
by phantasmagoria
I use tumblr for that kind of thing. It's far more mature.

Re: Instagram

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:33 pm
by Eraser
xer0s wrote:Well, I'm not sure if you guys have never used it or don't understand, but you're not forced to look at the "food and children" photos. There are some legitimate photographers, people that live in interesting places, and people that have the same interests as you that have great photos. You can follow these people and you don't even have to bother with the rest of the "hipsters"...
But why would I be interested in photographers who use a mobile phone to take pictures and apply cheap filters to said photos instead of photographers who use real professional photocameras?

Re: Instagram

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:19 pm
by seremtan
Don Carlos wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20767537
Facebook's photo-sharing site Instagram has updated its privacy policy giving it the right to sell users' photos to advertisers without notification.

Unless users delete their Instagram accounts by a deadline of 16 January, they cannot opt out.

The changes also mean Instagram can share information about its users with Facebook, its parent company, as well as other affiliates and advertisers.
Oh dear...
:olo:

Re: Instagram

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:51 pm
by xer0s
Eraser wrote:
xer0s wrote:Well, I'm not sure if you guys have never used it or don't understand, but you're not forced to look at the "food and children" photos. There are some legitimate photographers, people that live in interesting places, and people that have the same interests as you that have great photos. You can follow these people and you don't even have to bother with the rest of the "hipsters"...
But why would I be interested in photographers who use a mobile phone to take pictures and apply cheap filters to said photos instead of photographers who use real professional photocameras?
A lot of times it's not about the hardware or the professional status of the photographer, but more about the people, place, subject matter, and spontaneity of a photo...

Re: Instagram

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:48 pm
by obsidian
...as seen through the fake lenses on a pair of Rayban Wayfarers.