Quake3World

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:29 pm**

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotu ... index.html
any questions?

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:31 pm**

i never believed in that shit anyway.

well played.

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:39 pm**

Good.

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:41 pm**

goodday

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:14 pm**

Freakaloin wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotus.commandments.ap/index.html
any questions?

im a Christian and I think this is good, you stupid faggot.

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:27 pm**

So we can mark you down as "NON-PWNED!!!", then?

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:28 pm**

mark me down as non pwned

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:29 pm**

*marks mark down as non-pwned*

Consider yourself marked, Mark.

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm**

A marked man.

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:36 pm**

call me marcus garvey

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:41 pm**

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:43 pm**

Keep It Real wrote:
im a Christian...

lol...moron alert...

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:48 pm**

Freakaloin wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:
im a Christian...
lol...literacy alert...

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:48 pm**

5-4 vote? is'nt that cutting it a little close?

edit: so once GWB gets a few appointees in there, it's game over?

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:19 pm**

I don't see how this is a wonderful decision... They didn't decide anything. They basically said, some courthouses can do it, and some can't. Every issue regarding the Ten Commandments need to go to court and be decided on constitutional grounds.

And did they mention anywhere in their judgement the implications of this, as far as monuments to other religions?

I'm not so sure this ruling did anything except open a can of worms even further.

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:55 pm**

"pwned"? that must be your dad in those pics

Quake3World

rofl...christians PWNED...

rofl...christians PWNED...

Re: rofl...christians PWNED...

Re: rofl...christians PWNED...

Re: rofl...christians PWNED...