Anything into OIL?

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

We're going to have to come up with new technologies sooner or later to find other ways to get resources of what we use day to day. And the sooner the better.
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14376
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

we need a way to counteract global warming.

energy doesn't have to be a problem at all
phantasmagoria
Posts: 8525
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am

Post by phantasmagoria »

i hope it's not bullshit.
[size=85]
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

if it's not - energy mongers will stop it, as it would crush their incom base.
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

read it: most interresting :icon14:

it is not the solution to everything though, as burning this oil still produces CO2. however it is better then burning todays oil as it takes away the CO2 emmited during decomposition of these wastes.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

It's not a save-all, it's just a cleaner burning oil.

It still takes massive amounts of energy to create it - i.e. crude oil.

Maybe if, instead of burning crude in cars and everything else, they were to use the rest of it for projects like this, we could continue to have the kind of lifestyle we're used to.

But again, this still produces CO2, so it doesn't solve the environmental problems, even though it does decrease the damage done by quite a bit.

I know how to turn peanut oil and used cooking oil into diesel fuel you can run in your car. The problem is, it still takes electricity to do it.

edit: It is a good idea though, and it's good to see things like this being researched. There may be hope for an energy solution yet.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

Alberta tar Sands:

~300 billion barrels accessable with today's technology

estimated 1.6-3 trillion barrels of oil in total, perhaps accessable with tomorrow's technology

oil extraction remains expensive though
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
Canidae
Posts: 2351
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:29 am

Post by Canidae »

High prices make it profitable now.
Better than the high price we pay to the Middle East.
[img]http://www.subliminaldissonance.com/popehat.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.subliminaldissonance.com/images/smilies/nothing.jpg[/img]
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Canidae wrote:High prices make it profitable now.
Better than the high price we pay to the Middle East.
Profit is not the only concern. When it takes more energy to extract and refine it, than you can get out of the product, then what's the point?
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

R00k wrote:
Canidae wrote:High prices make it profitable now.
Better than the high price we pay to the Middle East.
Profit is not the only concern. When it takes more energy to extract and refine it, than you can get out of the product, then what's the point?
Market pressures will force us to extract oil from Alberta.

The market will be willing to pay more to extract oil, combined with technological progress that makes oil extraction more affordable over time.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

you're still talking about profit, and not the law of conservation of energy. :icon17:

edit: you should realize by now, of course, that i'm dragging this into a long-term discussion about how it can help blunt the impact of peak oil. :p
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

R00k wrote:you're still talking about profit, and not the law of conservation of energy. :icon17:

edit: you should realize by now, of course, that i'm dragging this into a long-term discussion about how it can help blunt the impact of peak oil. :p
Sorry I didn't read your post properly. I don't know if it takes more energy to extract and refine the oil then the energy it produces.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

Although... R00K they are already extracting oil from there so I doubt they're doing it with an energy deficit (input to output).
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
Canidae
Posts: 2351
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:29 am

Post by Canidae »

Massive Quasars wrote:
R00k wrote:you're still talking about profit, and not the law of conservation of energy. :icon17:

edit: you should realize by now, of course, that i'm dragging this into a long-term discussion about how it can help blunt the impact of peak oil. :p
Sorry I didn't read your post properly. I don't know if it takes more energy to extract and refine the oil then the energy it produces.
It doesn't and it's not an issue here.
While its true that gas has a big advantage over other fuels in terms of energy density and make it more suitable for storage in a moving vehicle over things like hydrogen it doesn't mean we have to burn it the way we do and make the emissions we do.
At the market prices now it is profitable and efficient (more energy out than put in to refine) to exploit the Alberta fields. But I am AGAINST paying world prices to multinational owned companies exploiting it now and going into the coffers of the Albertans unless it is done in concert with us sustaining our needs with a policy that eliminates our buying of world oil with all its political baggage. We, as Canadians should only pay the world premium price for our own oil if the excess cost of it goes towards a crash course research program to come up with a cleaner renewable energy system.

BTW sometimes it doesn't always matter if the energy put in is more than what you get out and that is when the energy cost you nothing, except the collection infrastructure, and what I'm talking about is creating hydrogen based fuels from solar and hydro sources where the fuel is the for example put in a vehicle that can't have sufficient onboard solar collection (or a dam :) ) onboard for its needs
zeeko
Posts: 865
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2000 7:00 am

Post by zeeko »

mb everybody should pour money into time travel and somebody could travel into the future and figure out wtf we are supposed to do...
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v655/HerrDrFunkenstein/lol.jpg[/img]
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

I'm not fond of Albertans, it's a shame they have the resources that could enrich their economy.

What was the estimate for when we would run out of oil? 2030? 2035? I still think we're set for that date (+/- 7 years).
Canidae
Posts: 2351
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:29 am

Post by Canidae »

zeeko wrote:mb everybody should pour money into time travel and somebody could travel into the future and figure out wtf we are supposed to do...
More than likely they would find out what we did wrong.
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

Massive Quasars wrote:I'm not fond of Albertans, it's a shame they have the resources that could enrich their economy.

What was the estimate for when we would run out of oil? 2030? 2035? I still think we're set for that date (+/- 7 years).
2050-2080 as far as i remember.

this is because as the oil prices increase, other sources will become viable.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

Pext wrote: 2050-2080 as far as i remember.

this is because as the oil prices increase, other sources will become viable.
That's a key assumption. The date I quoted was if the world did not transition to other energy sources before oil ran out.
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

hm - there is need for a definition of 'running out' as well.

is it the point when oil is to expensive for the industry to rely on? or is it the point, when everything is actually used up?

as increasing oil-; thus energy- prices make alternative sources more viable, these sectors will experience inverstements as well.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

Pext wrote: is it the point when oil is to expensive for the industry to rely on? or is it the point, when everything is actually used up?

as increasing oil-; thus energy- prices make alternative sources more viable, these sectors will experience inverstements as well.
My point was for the actual oil running out.

I realize the market will shift to other energy sources, or at least try. I'm not sure exactly how they came to that more recent date for oil running out.

I think one of the Peak Oil people more recently said that he thought the world could shift to alternative energy before oil shortages led to the end of civilization (or some dooms-day prediction like that).
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

the first assumptions about oil's sustainability where made by the Club of Rome in the 1980's i belive. they predicted a range of 50 years (2030)... i think they siply took the known oil reserves and related them to economy prognosises. current estimates range from 2050 to 2150 i believe.

[edit]oh... yeah - this 'doomsday' stuff is crap.
Canidae
Posts: 2351
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:29 am

Post by Canidae »

I wonder if they take into account the current uplift of the Chinese economy which is accelerating consumption.
I doubt that they do sufficiently just as they don't take into account a decline in the event of a major upheaval in our civilization occurring.
[img]http://www.subliminaldissonance.com/popehat.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.subliminaldissonance.com/images/smilies/nothing.jpg[/img]
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

The doomsday stuff is exaggerated. However I don't know how the world will react to oil supply problems when they become much worse. We will likely adapt and shift to other energy sources but during that economic adjustment will their be a global recession?
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
Scarface
Posts: 1775
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Scarface »

Massive Quasars wrote:I'm not fond of Albertans, it's a shame they have the resources that could enrich their economy.

What was the estimate for when we would run out of oil? 2030? 2035? I still think we're set for that date (+/- 7 years).
we're completely out of debt, our province is rich
Post Reply