R00k wrote:Maiden wrote:R00k wrote:
Because that's the way demolitions of that kind of building are done.
That is why demolition of large buildings is such a precise and well-planned undertaking to begin with.
demo of that kind of building?
its never been done.
WTC was four times taller than the tallest building ever imploded.
and i wouldn't call flying an airliner into the side of it being precise.
Demo of a building that shaped -- opposed to one the shape of the sports dome.
Flying an airliner into it has nothing to do with the precision. If it has been stated by the architects and engineers of the buildings that they were built to withstand impacts from 757's, what better justification in the world would there be?
remove and melt every piece of steel from the site, and you have absolutely no evidence of anything happening except a pile of finely powdered concrete and rubble.
The collapses were not 'precise'
http://www.implosionworld.com/wtc.htm
DID THE WORLD TRADE CENTER TOWERS ACTUALLY “IMPLODE”?
No. They collapsed in an uncontrolled fashion, causing extensive damage to surrounding structures, roadways and utilities. Although when viewed from a distance the towers appeared to have telescoped almost straight down, a closer look at video replays reveal sizeable portions of each building breaking free during the collapse, with the largest sections--some as tall as 30 or 40 stories--actually “laying out” in several directions. The outward failure of these sections is believed to have caused much of the significant damage to adjacent structures, and smaller debris caused structural and cosmetic damage to hundreds of additional buildings around the perimeter of the sit
DID THE TERRORISTS PLANT ANY BOMBS IN THE BUILDINGS IN ADVANCE TO GUARANTEE THEIR DEMISE?
To our knowledge there is no evidence whatsoever to support this assertion. Analysis of video and photographs of both towers clearly shows that the initial structural failure occurred at or near the points where the planes impacted the buildings. Furthermore, there is no visible or audible indication that explosives or any other supplemental catalyst was used in the attack.
Also there were many professionals (including demolition experts) who worked on the removal of debris who were actually tasked with identifying different debris etc. They haven't reported evidence of demolition.
http://www.implosionworld.com/wtc2.htm
Project Managers from all five primary demolition contractors that worked to clear the World Trade Center site in New York appeared together for the first time recently to answer questions and relate their experiences in a compelling seminar at the National Association of Demolition Contractor's (NADC) 30th Annual Convention in Orlando, Florida USA.
Several hundred delegates attended the highly anticipated "no-question-is-off-limits" Q&A session. Speakers included David Griffin Jr., Vice President of D.H. Griffin, Inc. and Demolition Consultant for the Ground Zero site, Mike Richman of Gateway Demolition, Ed King of Mazzocchi Wrecking, Jon Manafort of Manafort Brothers and Dennis Dannenfelser of Yannuzzi Demolition & Disposal. Each firm was responsible for one quadrant of the site's cleanup during the six months after 9/11.
it was Dannenfelser who provided some of the most compelling observations. Having spent months coordinating retrieval efforts at the Fresh Kills Landfill in Staten Island, he spoke of working closely with the FBI and other agencies in developing various types of debris filtering machines, including one that could recognize small amounts of "human material" for DNA identification. He also spoke of retrieving, "about 10,000 pieces of the airplanes, which I kept in a pile by my truck for safekeeping."
