WTC Was Demolished By Explosives!

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:27 pm

lol...what an idiot...expected...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:29 pm

prince1000 wrote:i don't like bush, nor do i like his so-called 'christian' base, but to think the towers were demo'd just to invade iraq/middle east/destroy islam is preposterous.

the american public is so fucking easy to manipulate that it would not take nearly the effort this 'conspiracy' would neccesitate to go to war. ffs, he gave congress the shaft, as well as the rest of the free world outside of britain without staging any crazy fireworks display. hello?

lol...it had nothing to do with the middle east really...more about controlling resources and domination of the world...its the "there can be only one" attitude of some after the soviet union collapsed...

Post by **Dave** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:36 pm

Freakaloin wrote:lol...what an idiot...expected...

Didn't like what you saw in the mirror, eh?

Post by **prince1000** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:38 pm

Freakaloin wrote:
prince1000 wrote:i don't like bush, nor do i like his so-called 'christian' base, but to think the towers were demo'd just to invade iraq/middle east/destroy islam is preposterous.

the american public is so fucking easy to manipulate that it would not take nearly the effort this 'conspiracy' would neccesitate to go to war. ffs, he gave congress the shaft, as well as the rest of the free world outside of britain without staging any crazy fireworks display. hello?

lol...it had nothing to do with the middle east really...more about controlling resources and domination of the world...its the "there can be only one" attitude of some after the soviet union collapsed...

im well aware of the rumsfield/wolfowitz military presence thru-out the world doctrine but my point is that this could be put into affact/had been put into affect prior to 911 and even before the collapse of the soviet union. the middle east/iraq/crusade was just an example of popular theory.

i guess it's easier for some people to presume the US is capable of being so diabolically subversive rather than it being a failure of the intelligence infrastructure in conjunction with xenophobic foreign relations that lead to this 'tragedy'. much more glamorous than being labeled inept...the perfect spin for this administration.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:43 pm

wow...prince...i didn't figure u to be such a complete and utter moron...guess my first impression was wrong...

Post by **prince1000** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:51 pm

if you can come up with evidence that there are eye witness accounts/documented evidence of the preparation of any of these buildings before those planes hit them other than hearsay then i would reconsider my position, but, the effort this would take is not neccessary for the US gov't to do whatever they want! that is my main point.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:54 pm

if u can come up with evidence that bin laden had anything to do with 911 i will reconsider my position...but it will be hard cuz even the govt hasn't been able to do that...and yet everyone thinks he did...hmmm...

Post by **prince1000** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:56 pm

so this is bullshit:

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/ ... 87F61F.htm

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:58 pm

oh yeah thats bullshit...unless he has completely changed his ideology...as in if bush suddenly become the most liberal president of all time...also he is right handed in that video...many other bs shit in there...

and its just a video dude...i wanna see actually proof...ur telling me the only proof is two videos...one which has been proven a fake and this one?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:59 pm

and the bush admin said they had the proof a few days after 911 and would give it to us..but it never happened...hmmm...did they mean those videos? rofl...

Post by **prince1000** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:03 pm

so basically neither of us have any proof and we should just rely on our belief in said 'truths'?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:04 pm

there much more evidence of an inside job then arab terrorists....moutains more...

Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:05 pm

If you love Bin Laden so much freak why don't you go live with him so you can suck his dick in person.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:06 pm

i love him since i don't think he did it? wow...spoken like a truely foxified moron...gg...

Post by **prince1000** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:07 pm

Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:08 pm

Don't try and turn things around now, yah fucking terrorist hugger.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:10 pm

k...hey i think fox and friends is on...go catch it...

Post by **Nightshade** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:18 pm

Let's see here, on the one hand you have Al-Jazeera(A news organization so despised by the Bush administration that they've publicly berated them, attacked their offices with tanks and machine gun fire, and killed their correspondents with missiles) saying that the video of bin Laden is legit, and that he's responsible.
On the other hand you have Goof. A forty year old stoner housebitch that sleeps in a tinfoil hat, worships Alex Jones, and gets all his info from 911crackpot.org.

Who do you believe?

Post by **prince1000** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:21 pm

geoff have you seen control room?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:22 pm

lol...how does aljazeera authenticate videos better then anyone else? do u know how they got tapes? guess what...not directly...

and btw...i think alex jones is a twit...but see u think u know me from stuff i post on a msgboard...show how ignorant u really r...lol....

Post by **prince1000** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:25 pm

Freakaloin wrote:lol...how does aljazeera authenticate videos better then anyone else? do u know how they got tapes? guess what...not directly...

and btw...i think alex jones is a twit...but see u think u know me from stuff i post on a msgboard...show how ignorant u really r...lol....

well you're no pragmatist...nor a terrorist hugger lol

Post by **R00k** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:28 pm

Nightshade wrote:Let's see here, on the one hand you have Al-Jazeera(A news organization so despised by the Bush administration that they've publicly berated them, attacked their offices with tanks and machine gun fire, and killed their correspondents with missiles) saying that the video of bin Laden is legit, and that he's responsible.
On the other hand you have Goof. A forty year old stoner housebitch that sleeps in a tinfoil hat, worships Alex Jones, and gets all his info from 911crackpot.org.

Who do you believe?

To be fair, Al Quaeda hates Al Jazeera, and calls them an American mouthpiece.

Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:29 pm

Hey your kids are out of control again. Time to go blow some second hand "white rhino" in their faces to calm them.

Post by **R00k** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:30 pm

Pooinyourmouth_needmerge wrote:If you love Bin Laden so much freak why don't you go live with him so you can suck his dick in person.

I now see that you're on the same reasoning level as geoff. Maybe you guys can keep each other occupied while the rest of the thread continues in a somewhat reasonable debate.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:32 pm

prince1000 wrote:
Freakaloin wrote:lol...how does aljazeera authenticate videos better then anyone else? do u know how they got tapes? guess what...not directly...

and btw...i think alex jones is a twit...but see u think u know me from stuff i post on a msgboard...show how ignorant u really r...lol....
well you're no pragmatist...nor a terrorist hugger lol

crushed...