Fast Defrag 2 Professional
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Fast Defrag 2 Professional
It's a ram defragger. Any good? Seems to cause sporadic system slow downs, though that may be caused by any number of other programs.
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Yes, possibly.
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
My entire system maintainance regime:
- Fast Defrag 2 Professional
- Norton AV (scheduled scans daily)
- MS antispyware (scheduled scans daily, auto-updates)
- Sygate Personal Firewall Pro
- Executive Software Diskeeper 9 (scheduled HD defrags daily, defrags HDs much quicker than regular defrag prog)
- Fast Defrag 2 Professional
- Norton AV (scheduled scans daily)
- MS antispyware (scheduled scans daily, auto-updates)
- Sygate Personal Firewall Pro
- Executive Software Diskeeper 9 (scheduled HD defrags daily, defrags HDs much quicker than regular defrag prog)
-
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
Most of those are decent but you don't need Fast Defrag (as Jug said, its snake oil) and you don't need Sygate providing you have a router in place (unless you really see a need for outbound protection).Massive Quasars wrote:My entire system maintainance regime:
- Fast Defrag 2 Professional
- Norton AV (scheduled scans daily)
- MS antispyware (scheduled scans daily, auto-updates)
- Sygate Personal Firewall Pro
- Executive Software Diskeeper 9 (scheduled HD defrags daily, defrags HDs much quicker than regular defrag prog)
Posted a few hours ago in Gen Disc:
Foo wrote:Pyro, you should read this: http://www.windowsitpro.com/WinInfo/Art ... 41095.html
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
― Terry A. Davis
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
unless he's possibly got spyware that MS anti hasn't caught yet. Kerio Personal Firewall is light and a great alternative to Sygate.Tormentius wrote:...and you don't need Sygate providing you have a router in place (unless you really see a need for outbound protection).[/color]
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Sygate is also light, but is Kerio superior?
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
I've not used Sygate, only tested Kerio and ZoneAlarm for friends/family. Kerio was a clear choice, imo. This is of course only used in conjunction with a router and for "heavy clickers". If you know your system is clean, and you have a router, kill a process by eliminating the software firewall.Massive Quasars wrote:Sygate is also light, but is Kerio superior?
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
It's much quicker when it's more frequent, I set it for a time when I'm away from the computer. I mentioned that these defrags were by design much faster than normal defrags, coupled with low fragmentation after a day's use, the defrags are downright speedy.+JuggerNaut+ wrote:btw, isn't a DAILY defrag a bit overkill?
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Torm, I'm behind a router most of the time but occasionally (sometimes frequently) I'm on wifi networks with many other strangers.
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
I manage to bring any system I use to it's knees over time, unfortunate fact. From my personal experience, defrags help a good bit, enough to justify their scheduled use in this case.Foo wrote:I don't notice any performance gain with degragging since I moved from Windows 98.
Minor gains, but nothing that makes it worth doing.
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Btw, are there no good programs for managing RAM out there?
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
only time i ever noticed a performance gain was when someone hadn't EVER done one on their pc after two years. other than that, a quarterly one is good enough for me, but not necessary.Foo wrote:I don't notice any performance gain with degragging since I moved from Windows 98.
Minor gains, but nothing that makes it worth doing.
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
what's "over time"? i reinstall at least once a year just because. instead of third party apps maybe you should consider doing that more often. not a big deal once you ghost it or do an unattended install.Massive Quasars wrote:I manage to bring any system I use to it's knees over time, unfortunate fact. From my personal experience, defrags help a good bit, enough to justify their scheduled use in this case.Foo wrote:I don't notice any performance gain with degragging since I moved from Windows 98.
Minor gains, but nothing that makes it worth doing.
-
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
Yes, there a couple excellent memory management apps available: they're called Windows 2000 or Windows XP. Both OS' do a more than adequate job of managing their own memory. Check the link Foo posted for a more detailed explanation.Massive Quasars wrote:Btw, are there no good programs for managing RAM out there?

-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am