so can landis win the whole thing
Or golf.. hitting tiny balls into a cup, walking around and drinkingwerldhed wrote:Don't you get excited about watching cars drive in cricles?Dr_Watson wrote:when someone sets it up... it must be knocked down.
but for real... how can anyone but their mother's be honestly interested in watching a bunch of guys ride bikes up a hill?
its almost as uninteresting as marathon running, and the only thing marathons have going is that someone's body might completely shut down.
personally i'd rather turn on the TV and watch the 24 hour wallpaper channel.
Diffr'nt strokes...
pot & kettle...
etc...
I prefer to think of it as: Hit a ball, chase it down, hit it away from you again, chase it down, eventually corralling it into the cup. Then doing it 17 more times.Dave wrote:Or golf.. hitting tiny balls into a cup, walking around and drinkingwerldhed wrote:Don't you get excited about watching cars drive in cricles?Dr_Watson wrote:when someone sets it up... it must be knocked down.
but for real... how can anyone but their mother's be honestly interested in watching a bunch of guys ride bikes up a hill?
its almost as uninteresting as marathon running, and the only thing marathons have going is that someone's body might completely shut down.
personally i'd rather turn on the TV and watch the 24 hour wallpaper channel.
Diffr'nt strokes...
pot & kettle...
etc...
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
oops:
PARIS - Floyd Landis' backup doping sample tested positive Saturday, increasing the prospect of the American cyclist being stripped of his Tour de France victory.
In a further blow to Landis' defense, the head of France's anti-doping commission said the cyclist's samples contained synthetic testosterone, indicating his elevated levels were not produced naturally.
"I have received a text message from Chatenay-Malabry lab that indicates the 'B' sample of Floyd Landis' urine confirms testosterone was taken in an exogenous way," French anti-doping council head Pierre Bordry told The Associated Press.
Landis has claimed the testosterone was "natural and produced by my own organism."
-
- Posts: 14375
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
oh well if a lawyer said it...
Fucks sake, what does it matter? The medical professionals involved in this will be far more knowledgeable on the subject than any online speculator, so he did it. American or any other nationality, who cares.
Rough summary of the tour this year:
1. 'Lol who cares about the tour'
2. American Wins
3. 'Lol take that france'
4. Winner fails drug test
5. 'Must be something wrong with the tests'
6. Winner is disqualified
7. 'Probably naturally occuring testosterone'
Lol, bollocks.
Fucks sake, what does it matter? The medical professionals involved in this will be far more knowledgeable on the subject than any online speculator, so he did it. American or any other nationality, who cares.
Rough summary of the tour this year:
1. 'Lol who cares about the tour'
2. American Wins
3. 'Lol take that france'
4. Winner fails drug test
5. 'Must be something wrong with the tests'
6. Winner is disqualified
7. 'Probably naturally occuring testosterone'
Lol, bollocks.
what's with that attitude? Teriba's post was made before the definitive ratio was known - and he didnt' say anything other than he had to be over the limit, which was lowered.Foo wrote:Right, sure. He tested at 11:1.teriba wrote:Normal ratio is 1:1-3:1. The old limit used to be 6:1 but they just lowered it to 4:1. So he was over 4:1.
That was totally down to them moving the goalposts.
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
They probably didn't, but I don't know that this alone would drive them to cheat on the results of a test.
Perhaps he was using a masking agent that didn't work after stage 17...I dunno. But I see now that it seems a bit like an unfair crucifixion by the media considering he was clean in every sample throughout the race and then all of the sudden positive in this one. None of the initial articles on the story mentioned this - it was just like BAM - HE'S A DRUGGY. Maybe he is, but I would have expected to see some people posing a few thoughts and questions regarding how someone would test positive in the middle of the Tour after several negative tests.
I'm not saying he's innocent necessarily...I just want to hear some more expert opinions on what may have happened to give a positive test in this specific case (i.e. masking agents...etc.)
Perhaps he was using a masking agent that didn't work after stage 17...I dunno. But I see now that it seems a bit like an unfair crucifixion by the media considering he was clean in every sample throughout the race and then all of the sudden positive in this one. None of the initial articles on the story mentioned this - it was just like BAM - HE'S A DRUGGY. Maybe he is, but I would have expected to see some people posing a few thoughts and questions regarding how someone would test positive in the middle of the Tour after several negative tests.
I'm not saying he's innocent necessarily...I just want to hear some more expert opinions on what may have happened to give a positive test in this specific case (i.e. masking agents...etc.)
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 2:44 am
-
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am