tomorrow tomorrow tomorrow tomorrow

Post by **feedback** » Tue Dec 12, 2006 5:44 am

tomorrow tomorrow tomorrow tomorrow... not tommorow.. tomorrow tomorrow whe can't I ever spell it right... jinjja yo

Post by **Underpants?** » Tue Dec 12, 2006 5:47 am

for me, it's the gentle (pur)suation of correctol.
persuation? persuasion?
persuasian???
PRTSDFJF:SDKLSION?????
I FEEL YOU 'BAGGY

Post by **shaft** » Tue Dec 12, 2006 5:56 am

acceptable
accidentally
accommodate
acquire
acquit
a lot
amateur
apparent
argument
atheist
believe
bellwether
calendar
category
cemetery
changeable
collectible
column
committed
conscience
conscientious
conscious
consensus
daiquiri
definite(ly)
discipline
drunkenness
dumbbell
embarrass(ment)
equipment
exhilarate
exceed
existence
experience
fiery
foreign
gauge
grateful
guarantee
harass
height
hierarchy
humorous
ignorance
immediate
independent
indispensable
inoculate
intelligence
its/it's
jewelry
judgment
kernel (colonel)
leisure
liaison
library
license
lightning
maintenance
maneuver
medieval
memento
millennium
miniature
minuscule
mischievous
misspell
neighbor
noticeable
occasionally
occurrence
pastime
perseverance
personnel
playwright
possession
precede
principal/principle
privilege
pronunciation
publicly
questionnaire
receive/receipt
recommend
referred
reference
relevant
restaurant
rhyme
rhythm
schedule
separate
sergeant
supersede
their/they're/there
threshold
twelfth
tyranny
until
vacuum
weather
weird

Post by **Ryoki** » Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:48 am

Post by **MKJ** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:52 pm

kernel vs colonel is really terrible, and i hope i will never meet anyone who makes that mistake

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:45 pm

Post by **Captain** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:35 pm

Post by **Captain** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:15 pm

Post by **Wabbit** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 11:08 pm

Insperational.

That's it. The fucking nitwit on another board made a one word post and misspelled the fucking word. I make my share of fuck-ups but if you're going to post one word, how about making sure it's right? Fucker.

Two more that made me batty:

We employ several inturns here.

There's a glowball cool down on that. (most creative spelling of global ever).

Post by **Wabbit** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 11:14 pm

And maybe this will help foose:

Remember it as two seperate words. To and Morrow.

You wouldn't start the word morrow with two m's so it's fairly easy to remember. (I remember seeing old english texts where they would say "on the morrow" meaning tomorrow.

Post by **plained** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 11:56 pm

it doent matter to marine biolijests anyways

Post by **feedback** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:02 am

yeah I'll just start saying on the morrow, I like that

Post by **Underpants?** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:44 am

theoneandonly wrote:Am I the only person in the world ...

where did you get that?

Sad, really but bullies and western society appear as inextricably interleaved as zealot suicide orgies and the middle east.

Can't help but feel like there's some kind of implcit bullying tone in current politics, art and entertainment as a mainstream catalyst. Something akin to complete and total domination of one's "adversaries" are the only key to undeniable victory. What happened to tolerance, compassion and reason in achieving resolution?

How many "ultimate" fighters suffer / will suffer brain damage or permanent debilitating injury for our twisted lust after some kind of viscerally vindictive itch? Why can't it be a simple boxing match, where a knocked down opponent is given a fair chance for revival--is the victory more satisfying when the recipient of a knockout punch is continually bashed in the face and head after he's unconscious?

Anyone else sick of hearing shit like "the only solution is to nuke the whole god damned middle east," or "turn that fucking desert into black glass," as another example?

Post by **seremtan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:03 am

you don't owe me a new keyboard for that

Post by **l0g1c** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 2:17 am

feedback wrote:yeah I'll just start saying on the morrow, I like that

On the morrow, you shall receive your purification. :icon6:

Post by **feedback** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:04 am

Underpants? wrote:
theoneandonly wrote:Am I the only person in the world ...
where did you get that?

Sad, really but bullies and western society appear as inextricably interleaved as zealot suicide orgies and the middle east.

Can't help but feel like there's some kind of implcit bullying tone in current politics, art and entertainment as a mainstream catalyst. Something akin to complete and total domination of one's "adversaries" are the only key to undeniable victory. What happened to tolerance, compassion and reason in achieving resolution?

How many "ultimate" fighters suffer / will suffer brain damage or permanent debilitating injury for our twisted lust after some kind of viscerally vindictive itch? Why can't it be a simple boxing match, where a knocked down opponent is given a fair chance for revival--is the victory more satisfying when the recipient of a knockout punch is continually bashed in the face and head after he's unconscious?

Anyone else sick of hearing shit like "the only solution is to nuke the whole god damned middle east," or "turn that fucking desert into black glass," as another example?

I'd just like to point out that Boxing is much more damaging and dangerous than MMA, as the only way to win is to punch your opponent in the head, and you are given the opportunity to get back up and fight after you are knocked down/out to keep getting brain damage. In an mma fight you will probably take fewer than 4 good punches before you are unable to intelligently defend, and the ref steps in. In a boxing match, hundreds of times you recieve hard blows to the head. Never mind the gloves are bigger in boxing, that isn't as much a factor in not receiving concussions.

Post by **Underpants?** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:12 pm

I see your point when it comes to submission holds, however when it comes to the destructive force sheer blow for blow, I disagree entirely, there's no way you can convince me there's a parallel. For example, in professional boxing, what force can a fighter impose even close to stomping a downed opponent in the face with the full weight of his airborne body?

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:14 pm

hey, that's a nice healthy rack

Post by **Underpants?** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:15 pm

oh isn't that tre troof

Post by **feedback** » Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:55 pm

Underpants? wrote:I see your point when it comes to submission holds, however when it comes to the destructive force sheer blow for blow, I disagree entirely, there's no way you can convince me there's a parallel. For example, in professional boxing, what force can a fighter impose even close to stomping a downed opponent in the face with the full weight of his airborne body?

While it's true that it is more forceful, it just isn't going to happen much. There has yet to be a death in sanctioned MMA, and there's been hundreds in boxing, not including brain damage.

Post by **Grudge** » Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:30 pm

I like how they bounce